Britain should scrap plan to ban khat drug: lawmakers

LONDON Thu Nov 28, 2013 7:37pm EST

People crowd to pick their choice of qat sticks at an open air wholesale market in Kenya's capital Nairobi July 10, 2013. REUTERS/Noor Khamis

People crowd to pick their choice of qat sticks at an open air wholesale market in Kenya's capital Nairobi July 10, 2013.

Credit: Reuters/Noor Khamis

Related Topics

LONDON (Reuters) - Britain's plan to ban khat, a leafy plant chewed as a stimulant in the Horn of Africa and the Arabian peninsula, should be dropped because it could alienate immigrants and damage counter-terrorism operations, lawmakers said on Friday.

Parliament's Home Affairs Committee, a panel with influence but no legal power, said the ban was not based on any evidence of medical or social harm.

The British government said in July that it would ban the drug, which is already prohibited in the United States and much of Europe. Parliament has yet to approve the decision.

Banning the use of khat, or qat, would create tension between the police and immigrants, particularly Somalis who have settled across Britain, the committee said in a report.

It would also be seen as a betrayal by Kenya, where growing khat is a big source of income in some areas, the panel added. Any damage to bilateral relations could undermine the two countries' joint fight against militants.

"It is baffling that potential friction, between already disadvantaged communities and the police, has not been fully considered," said committee chairman Keith Vaz. "We cannot afford for those who are already marginalized to be pushed towards criminality or extremism."

Home Secretary (interior minister) Theresa May said in July that the ban would help prevent Britain from becoming a hub for the illegal trade in khat to countries where it is banned. She also cited evidence that khat has been linked to "low attainment and family breakdowns".

Kenyan lawmakers told the committee that a khat ban in Britain could lead to people once employed in the trade joining al Shabaab, the Islamist militant group in Somalia.

The committee criticized the government for its failure to discuss the proposal in more detail with officials in Kenya, a former British colony.

"Considering Kenya's importance as a partner in the fight against international terrorism, and the well-established links between poverty and radicalization, the lack of consultation on this issue is particularly concerning," the committee said.

Instead of a ban, the committee said the government should consider licensing khat imports to help prevent Britain becoming a hub for traffickers of the drug.

(Reporting by Peter Griffiths; Editing by Ralph Boulton)

FILED UNDER:
We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (1)
SteveDobbs wrote:
Banning chopping peoples heads off could also “create tension between the police and (muslim) immigrants, particularly Somalis”

I suggest deportation for all these muslims…

Nov 29, 2013 12:57pm EST  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.

Pictures