Driver in fatal New York train crash 'zoned out': union

Wed Dec 4, 2013 1:37am EST

1 of 8. Workers are seen on the tracks of the Metro-North train derailment in the Bronx borough of New York December 3, 2013.

Credit: Reuters/Shannon Stapleton

Related Topics

(Reuters) - The driver of a New York commuter train that derailed on Sunday, killing four people, told federal investigators he "zoned out" shortly before the crash, the driver's labor union leader said.

The seven-car train was traveling at 82 miles per hour (132 km per hour), nearly three times the speed limit for the curved section of track where it crashed, investigators have said. The driver, William Rockefeller, 46, applied the brakes five seconds before it derailed.

The crash also critically injured 11 people and snarled travel for the roughly 26,000 regular commuters on the Metro-North Hudson line that serves suburbs north of New York City.

On Tuesday, Rockefeller told National Transportation Safety Board investigators that "he nodded. He zoned out," Anthony Bottalico, the general chairman of the driver's labor union, the Association of Commuter Rail Employees, told Reuters.

Rockefeller told investigators that "by the time he realized (what was happening) it was almost into the curve," Bottalico said. "He put the train into neutral and put the brakes on immediately. That's what he acknowledged he did."

The NTSB has cautioned that its investigation would continue for weeks, if not months, and it was far from reaching a conclusion on the cause.

Alcohol tests on Rockefeller came back negative, NTSB member Earl Weener told a news conference on Tuesday, adding the results of drug tests were still pending.

The train might have benefited from a Positive Train Control (PTC) system to stop or slow a speeding train, Weener said.

"For more than 20 years, the NTSB has recommended implementation" of PTC, Weener said. "Since this is a derailment, it's possible that PTC could have prevented it."

Railroad experts have been advocating for PTC systems for years, but they are expensive and complicated and often incompatible for all trains within a single transit system.

The Metropolitan Transportation Authority, which runs Metro-North, said it began work to install Positive Train Control in 2009 with a goal of implementing it by 2015. The authority said it has budgeted nearly $600 million, with at least another $300 million needed, and even then was unlikely to meet the 2015 deadline.

"I WAS IN A DAZE"

Apart from the equipment and technology, investigators are looking at Rockefeller, a volunteer firefighter who was married two years ago. The NTSB, which interviewed Rockefeller on Tuesday afternoon, said it is focusing on all his activities in the 72 hours before the crash, Weener said.

Rockefeller spent about two hours with NTSB investigators, said Bottalico of the driver's labor union.

The NTSB said in a statement late on Tuesday evening, after Bottalico's news interviews, that it had removed the Association of Commuter Rail Employees from the investigation, citing a breach of confidential information.

Rockefeller had never been disciplined for job performance in his 10 years as a train driver, his union said.

Rockefeller has retained a defense lawyer, Jeffrey Chartier, who did not respond to a request for comment.

One source involved in the ongoing investigation quoted Rockefeller directly as having told investigators, "I was in a daze" in the moments before the crash.

Asked whether Rockefeller dozed off, the source said, "It's more like a highway hypnosis. You're looking straight ahead and you're seeing rail and rail and rail, and you lose perspective."

A similar condition of temporary lapse of consciousness, known as microsleep, was blamed for a 2008 Boston light rail crash that killed the operator.

In 2003, assistant captain Richard Smith blacked out at the wheel of the Staten Island ferry and crashed on docking, killing 11 people. Smith pleaded guilty to negligent homicide and was sentenced to 18 months in prison.

Rockefeller could not fully recall what happened, except that at some point he suddenly came out of the temporary daze, realized the train was going too fast and into a dangerous curve, and applied the brakes, said the law-enforcement source, who has access to official reports on the investigation and requested anonymity.

"Look, it doesn't make what happened any better or anything, but this is comparable to driving a car and looking at the white lines, and sort of nodding off for a minute," Bottalico said.

If criminal charges are warranted, they would be brought by Bronx District Attorney Robert Johnson, a spokesman for Johnson said.

"We think when final record is looked at, they'll realize there was no criminal intent here," Bottalico said. "Speed was high, but it was an accident."

(Reporting by Chris Francescani in New York, Mark Hosenball in Washington and Curtis Skinner in Yonkers, New York; Writing by Daniel Trotta and Eric M. Johnson; Editing by Gunna Dickson and Lisa Shumaker)

FILED UNDER:
We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (7)
KathrynTW wrote:
This man should have had a lawyer before saying anything.

Dec 04, 2013 2:06am EST  --  Report as abuse
earlsnyder wrote:
This sounds like another ‘roll it downhill’ accident. The authorities know that driving a train is the equivalent of being hypnotized. Their official training likely advises the operator to take some ineffective action(s) to counteract it’s effect. When that doesn’t work and the mass transit carrier crashes, the authorities make a ‘fall guy’ out of the operator to appease those wanting blood. Whose fault is it really? Ethically, if the authorities had the power to fix the problem and didn’t, then they should be held accountable, not some guy whose expected to pay close attention to 10,000 episodes of the longest, most boring movie in the world without ever incurring a lapse in concentration.

Dec 04, 2013 2:09am EST  --  Report as abuse
genesis1one wrote:
PTC systems are “expensive and complicated and often incompatible for all trains within a single transit system.”

Well what about a cheaper easier option that would work with any train? A satnav uses GPS to give a very accurate speed reading in a car. Surely an app on smart phone could use GPS and a rail map to give an audible alarm if the max speed was being exceeded?

It would not be foolproof but neither is an automatic system as with that there’d be a danger of the driver becoming over reliant on it. It would not be foolproof but surely a cheap and effective step in the right direction.

Dec 04, 2013 5:37am EST  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.