China expresses regret over South Korea air defense zone

BEIJING Mon Dec 9, 2013 5:16am EST

BEIJING (Reuters) - China expressed "regret" on Monday that South Korea had extended its air defense zone to partially overlap with a similar zone declared by Beijing two weeks ago that has raised regional tensions.

China's declaration of an air defense identification zone in the East China Sea that includes islands at the heart of a territorial dispute with Japan has triggered protests from the United States and its close allies Japan and South Korea.

South Korea said on Sunday that its move to expand its own zone would not infringe on neighboring countries' sovereignty.

"China expresses regret over South Korea's expansion of its air defense identification zone," Foreign Ministry spokesman Hong Lei told reporters at a regular press briefing.

China had immediately conveyed its concerns to South Korea and requested that Seoul handles the matter "safely and cautiously", Hong said.

Hong said the zones, which overlap in an area that includes a submerged reef, called the Suyan Rock by China and Ieodo by South Korea, did not constitute territorial airspace.

"There currently does not exist a territorial dispute between China and South Korea on this issue," Hong said, but noted that the reef was situated in portions of both countries' exclusive economic zones.

"This can only be resolved through maritime negotiations," Hong said of the economic zone issue, which puts at stake rights to potential underwater oil and gas reserves.

South Korea objected to China's November 23 move as unacceptable because of the reef, which has a research station platform built atop it and is controlled by Seoul.

Under the Chinese zone's rules, all aircraft have to report flight plans to Chinese authorities, maintain radio contact and reply promptly to identification inquiries.

The extension of South Korea's zone, which was originally established by the U.S. Air Force in 1951 during the Korean War, will not apply any restrictions to the operation of commercial flights when it takes effect on December 15.

(Reporting by Michael Martina; Editing by Alex Richardson)

FILED UNDER:
We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (3)
Dumbstruck wrote:
So, China, how do you like the taste of your own medicine?

Dec 09, 2013 9:50am EST  --  Report as abuse
MikeBarnett wrote:
There is no real Chinese problem with the ROK extension of their ADIZ because both countries invaded by Japan now have overlapping zones to give themselves early warning of any “dastardly attack” from the Japanese.

Dec 09, 2013 6:31pm EST  --  Report as abuse
JackD68 wrote:
@MikeBarnett
Japan attacking the ROK? What rock have you been under? Their constitution does not permit this.

The Senkakus are administered by Japan and the PRC throws an ADIZ over it and that is okay? Last I checked the whole revolution was to get rid of Imperial China; so with that logic the PRC territorial sphere does not even include Taiwan, as the Nationalist still hold that. Now that PRC has decided there may be economic gain they are crying for territory which they had no interest in before?
PRC is afraid that since they have no real claim conforming with international standards like UNCLOS will result in their losing and in so losing face. Well if the PRC cannot handle negotiating within international law and customs perhaps they are not ready to be a “great power,” even if they have the second largest economy. The PRC is acting like a spoiled rich bully; angry everyone in the room will ot give them their way.

Dec 10, 2013 4:27am EST  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.