Mormon church explains defunct ban on blacks in priesthood

SALT LAKE CITY Tue Dec 10, 2013 10:46pm EST

Related Topics

SALT LAKE CITY (Reuters) - Thirty-five years after lifting a ban on blacks entering the priesthood, the Mormon church has offered an explanation for a practice that was in place for more than 100 years, saying it was rooted in the racism of the times.

A church-produced essay, "Race and the Priesthood," ties the ban to an 1852 speech by Brigham Young, the faith's second president, who led the church to Utah, and distances the modern Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints from the policy.

"The justifications for restrictions echoed the widespread ideas about racial inferiority that had been used to argue for the legalization of black 'servitude,'" reads the essay, part of a series aimed at giving Mormons more context for understanding various aspects of church history, practices and doctrine.

"Church leaders today unequivocally condemn all racism, past and present, in any form," the essay says.

In the past, Mormon church leaders have said history provided no clear explanation for the prohibition that barred black men from ordination to the lay priesthood and prevented black men and women from participating in sacred temple rites.

No such prohibitions were in place during the tenure of Joseph Smith, Jr., who founded the church in 1830, the church essay notes. Smith opposed slavery and himself ordained the faith's first black lay ministers. In the Mormon faith, only men can hold the priesthood.

In 1978 then-church President Spencer W. Kimball lifted the ban, citing what the church describes as a religious revelation, but the faith has had trouble shaking its history, and the issue of racism has arisen repeatedly, including during the 2012 presidential campaign of Mitt Romney, who is Mormon.

"For me what it says is that the church is finally admitting that (blacks) should never have been denied the priesthood," said Don Harwell, president of the Genesis Group, an organization for black church members. "It's overdue."

STEP FORWARD

Mormon historian Newell Bringhurst applauded the essay as the most comprehensive statement on the priesthood ban ever issued by church leaders. Still Bringhurst, a retired professor of history and author of multiple books on the ban, said it should be viewed with skepticism.

"It's a step forward, but I don't think it's adequate enough," Bringhurst said in a telephone interview from his home in Visalia, California. "They are going to have to own up to why it was perpetuated well into the civil rights era."

In 1852, Young said he believed full church membership, including the priesthood, would someday be restored to black members, but church leaders perpetuated the practice for more than 100 years, Bringhurst said. No explanation for those actions is offered by the essay, he said.

Bringhurst believes the essay reflects the church's shift toward dealing more honestly with its history, a move that may be tied to the proliferation of information about the faith from non-church sources on the Internet.

"I don't think the LDS church has any choice but to become more frank and forthright in admitting what happened," he said, noting that Mormonism has been growing rapidly in some South American and African countries.

"Membership of the church is now far more non-white than white ... it kind of makes sense" that the issue would be addressed, said Harwell, adding that his remarks are not made on behalf of Genesis.

"You can't just bring in people of color and ignore what the church was," he said. "But it's here. They said it and it kills a whole lot of stuff with the past. Now we can get on to building a better church."

(Editing by Cynthia Johnston and Paul Simao)

FILED UNDER:
We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (11)
Binderowner wrote:
Interesting how the change from polygamy was made upon the application for Statehood; credited as a “revelation from God” regarding the belief (He changed His mind, I presume), but the racist policy was purported not to be “doctrine” but just “a perpetuated practice”.
“Overdue” is certainly one description for repealing a policy perpetuated for over a century with no supporting Church Doctrine to support it.

Dec 11, 2013 12:06am EST  --  Report as abuse
WhyMeLord wrote:
OMG, Mormons are human after all; we thought they were all saints.
Mittens is obviously a saint as he is sealed to Annie at the hip.
Being sealed to Annie at the hip is more than enough to sanctify him.
I’m sure that there is a special place in heaven for him and Harry.
We’re sure Mormon’s God is very liberal; he likes Mittens and Harry.
Why the Mormon Church pretends to be conservative puzzles me no end.
I’ll bet they really like Obama just as much as Mittens and Harry.

Dec 11, 2013 12:06am EST  --  Report as abuse
Bookfan wrote:
Very good! Congratulations!

A first step in facing up to the fact that no supernatural event has ever happened in the whole history of the universe, not once, ie there are no gods, elves, smurf, holy books, angels etc.

Dec 11, 2013 7:08am EST  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.