Iran, six world powers resume expert talks on nuclear deal

GENEVA/BRUSSELS Thu Dec 19, 2013 11:57am EST

(L-R) British Foreign Secretary William Hague, Germany's Foreign Minister Guido Westerwelle, EU foreign policy chief Catherine Ashton, Iranian Foreign Minister Mohammad Javad Zarif, Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi, U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry, Russia's Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov and French Foreign Minister Laurent Fabius gather at the United Nations Palais in Geneva November 24, 2013. REUTERS/Carolyn Kaster/Pool

(L-R) British Foreign Secretary William Hague, Germany's Foreign Minister Guido Westerwelle, EU foreign policy chief Catherine Ashton, Iranian Foreign Minister Mohammad Javad Zarif, Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi, U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry, Russia's Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov and French Foreign Minister Laurent Fabius gather at the United Nations Palais in Geneva November 24, 2013.

Credit: Reuters/Carolyn Kaster/Pool

Related Topics

GENEVA/BRUSSELS (Reuters) - Iran and six world powers began expert-level talks in Geneva on Thursday to work out how to put into practice a landmark deal obliging Tehran to curb its nuclear program in return for some relief from economic sanctions.

Discussions on the details of last month's breakthrough accord were interrupted by Tehran diplomats last week, after a decision by the United States to blacklist 19 more Iranian companies and individuals.

But diplomats said much progress had been achieved in the four-day meeting on December 9-12 in Vienna, and expressed hope they could wrap up the practical discussions at meetings in Geneva on Thursday and Friday.

That could mean the seven countries - the United States, Russia, China, France, Britain, Germany and Iran - would be ready to agree on a date when the accord goes into effect.

Specifically, they would decide when western governments lift some economic sanctions and Iran curbs its most sensitive nuclear work.

"We were at an advanced stage in Vienna," said a diplomat from one of the six world powers. "A lot of work has been done so we can go very fast."

The diplomat, who spoke on condition of anonymity, cautioned, however, that some western diplomats were concerned Iran could be "more difficult" in the technical discussions because of Washington's decision to expand sanctions this month.

The nuclear accord is designed to halt Iran's nuclear advances for a period of six months to buy time for negotiations on a final settlement of the decade-old standoff.

Iran rejects western suspicions that its atomic work is aimed at acquiring nuclear weapons, and says it is for peaceful purposes only.

U.S. officials have said the new blacklistings should not complicate the practical talks and are part of U.S. efforts to continue exposing those supporting Iran's nuclear program or seeking to evade current sanctions.

DETAILING CONCESSIONS

In the technical discussions, experts aim to resolve issues dealing with how exactly sanctions can be lifted and what specifically Iran must do to meet its obligations on suspending parts of its nuclear work.

Diplomats said some issues had already been resolved in Vienna last week, including some aspects of how the U.N. nuclear watchdog, the International Atomic Energy Agency, will verify what Iran has done before the deal can be put into effect.

Questions remain on how western governments will ensure banks understand what transactions are allowed under the softened sanctions regime, and how and when Iran will be allowed to access several billion dollars worth of oil revenues frozen in overseas accounts.

Scope for easing the dispute peacefully opened after the June election of a comparative moderate, Hassan Rouhani, as Iranian president. He won in a landslide by pledging to ease Tehran's international isolation and win relief from sanctions that have severely damaged the oil producer's economy.

(Writing by Justyna Pawlak; Editing by Mark Trevelyan)

FILED UNDER:
We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (4)
Lemming wrote:
It’s my sincerest hopes that new sanctions on Iran will be implemented, negotiations terminated and those in the U.S. supporting a fools errand be exposed. Kerry couldn’t justify, rationalize or remotely convince myself or other politicians the interim deal with Iran was justified. Iran sponsors terror, tortures American captives and plays the Obama Administration like a fiddle pertaining to the safety of Israel along with other allies in the region. How many more times will Iran be allowed to stall, turn away inspectors and threaten our allies with annihilation?

Dec 19, 2013 12:26pm EST  --  Report as abuse
Lemming wrote:
Iran, Russia and N. Korea along with China will at times “test” the United States pertaining to our resolve. Our resolve should include a strong military presence, nuclear shields and strategic locations globally etc.! Obama isn’t worth a hoot at strategy, angers our allies and emboldens our enemies.

Dec 19, 2013 12:47pm EST  --  Report as abuse
Batavian1961 wrote:
How many more times will Iran be allowed to stall, turn away inspectors and threaten our allies with annihilation? As many times as Israel has.
Hey Tiger why don’t you enlist in the military, they could use some cannon fodder. Especially if they are going to take on Iran, and eventually Russia and China.

Dec 20, 2013 5:37am EST  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.