Spain privacy watchdog fines Google for breaking data law

MADRID Thu Dec 19, 2013 2:15pm EST

A Google logo is seen at the entrance to the company's offices in Toronto September 5, 2013. REUTERS/Chris Helgren

A Google logo is seen at the entrance to the company's offices in Toronto September 5, 2013.

Credit: Reuters/Chris Helgren

Related Topics

MADRID (Reuters) - Spain's privacy watchdog on Thursday fined Google for breaking the country's data protection law when combining personal information from its many different online services and failing to inform users clearly on how it uses their data.

Although the 900,000 euro ($1.23 million) fine is modest for Google, which has a market capitalisation of over $350 billion, the move reflects growing concerns across Europe about the volume of personal data that is held in foreign jurisdictions in so-called "cloud" storage services.

Under such services, data is stored remotely via the Internet instead of on-site, giving individuals little control over their personal information.

Last month, the Dutch Data Protection Authority also said Google was in breach of the national data privacy law for the same practices while France moved closer to fining the U.S. internet giant in September.

Investigations are taking place in at least three other European countries.

The probes were triggered after Google in March 2012 unilaterally imposed new terms of service on users of all its cloud services, which include the YouTube video streaming site, the GMail email service, and the ubiquitous Google search engine.

That decision triggered privacy investigations in six European countries, including Spain.

"Inspections have shown that Google compiles personal information through close to one hundred services and products it offers in Spain, without providing in many cases the adequate information about the data that is being gathered, why it is gathered and without obtaining the consent of the owners," said the Spanish Agency for Data Protection in a statement.

Google said it had engaged with the Spanish authorities to explain its privacy policy and would decide on which action to take once it had the opportunity to fully read its report.

The agency said users were not sufficiently informed that Google filtered the content of their emails and files to display advertising and, when it did it, used a terminology that was imprecise, unclear and with generic expressions.

It also said the company was breaking the law by using data it gathered for purposes that are unspecified and keeping this information for an indefinite time, while sometimes hindering users in their right to erase, access or modify this data.

In November Google agreed to pay a $17 million fine to settle allegations that it secretly tracked Web users by placing special digital files on the Web browsers of their smartphones.

($1 = 0.7316 euros)

(Reporting by Julien Toyer; editing by David Evans)

FILED UNDER:
We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (1)
rblivingston wrote:
Google sure is carrying some awkward baggage lately.

The world’s number 1 search engine is becoming an encumbrance and a liability to explorers on the web.

I use Duckduckgo.com which has many appealing advantages: it avoids content mills, it does not “bubble” or track you. Its creator has famously said that “By default, DuckDuckGo does not collect or share personal information. That is our privacy policy in a nutshell.”

Ultimately, there is something really wrong with an internet economy in which a handful of people make exceptional profits off of zeros and ones in a world where the vast majority of people live in deepening ignorance and want.

The internet is unlikely to fulfill its promise as a useful tool for mankind unless it is freed of the profit motive itself– to be democratically ruled for the benefit of all.

I am leery of the big internet companies who schmooze and hobnob to make deals with Obama who sends drones on cruel kill missions, and whose administration oversees a vast network of spies which routinely toss away constitutionally enshrined liberties.

If one must Google one last time, google “Lynne Stewart” to learn something about the state of America today.

Stewart is sick and dying in prison for having defended an unpopular client at a time in America’s history when security took precedence over liberty.

The justice department thus far has not even allowed her a compassionate release to see her family one last time over the holidays.

She is made as an example to intimidate other attorneys by a lawless administration. Doubtless defenders of internet freedom are intimidated as well, or are having to seek asylum elsewhere, like Edward Snowden.

I for one wonder what companies like Google would be if they flourished in a Nazi state.

America today seems not far removed.

Dec 20, 2013 9:23am EST  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.