Hit by scandal and resignations, Turk PM names new ministers

ANKARA/ISTANBUL Wed Dec 25, 2013 5:19pm EST

1 of 13. Turkey's Prime Minister Tayyip Erdogan addresses the media in Ankara December 25, 2013.

Credit: Reuters/Umit Bektas

Related Video

Video

Turkish ministers quit

Wed, Dec 25 2013

Related Topics

ANKARA/ISTANBUL (Reuters) - Turkish Prime Minister Tayyip Erdogan reshuffled his cabinet on Wednesday after three members quit over a corruption scandal that has posed an unprecedented challenge to his 11-year rule.

The crisis erupted on December 17 when dozens of people, including of the head of state-run Halkbank, were arrested on graft charges. Erdogan responded by purging police investigators. The ensuing feud with the judiciary reignited long-simmering street protests and rattled foreign investors.

Earlier on Wednesday, three ministers who had sons among those detained resigned. Two of them echoed Erdogan in depicting the inquiry as baseless and a conspiracy. The third, Environment Minister Erdogan Bayraktar, turned on the premier.

"For the sake of the wellbeing of this nation and country, I believe the prime minister should resign," he told NTV news.

By breaking ranks, Bayraktar may have diluted any easing of pressure on Erdogan afforded by the ministers' resignations, although some commentators thought their timing was off.

"These are very late and difficult resignations. They don't have any value in terms of democracy," said Koray Caliskan, an associate professor at Istanbul's Bogazici University.

After nightfall, a spent-looking Erdogan announced he was appointing 10 new ministers to replace the three who quit and others planning mayoral runs in local elections in March.

The fact that the shake-up happened over Christmas cushioned the blow to Turkey on dormant international markets. But the stock index closed 4.2 percent and the lira weakened to 2.0862 against the dollar.

During his three terms in office, Erdogan has transformed Turkey by tackling its once-dominant secular military and overseen rapid economic expansion. He weathered anti-government demonstrations that swept Istanbul and other cities in mid-2013.

The gauntlet thrown down by Bayraktar set off fresh protests in Ankara, Istanbul and Izmir. Erdogan was unmoved.

PROTOCOL, PURGES

In a speech earlier on Wednesday, he vowed no tolerance corruption. He argued that the work of the about 70 police investigators he had sacked or reassigned - including the chief of the force in Istanbul, Halkbank's headquarters - was deeply tainted.

"If a verdict is made by the opposition party on the second day of the investigation, what's the point of having judges? If a decision is made by the media, what's the point of having these long legal procedures?" Erdogan said to provincial leaders of his Islamist-rooted AK party.

Alluding to TV news reports that have riveted Turks with footage of cash-filled shoe boxes allegedly seized at suspects' homes, he asked: "How do you know what that money is for?"

The 14-month investigation was conducted largely in secret. At the weekend, the government changed regulations for the police, requiring officers to report evidence, investigations, arrests and complaints to commanding officers and prosecutors. Journalists have been banned from police stations.

The Hurriyet newspaper said up to 550 police officers, including senior commanders, had been dismissed nationwide in the past week by Interior Minister Muammer Guler, who has now resigned.

Erdogan's critics see an authoritarian streak in his rule. The European Union, to which Turkey has long sought accession, on Tuesday urged Ankara to safeguard the separation of powers.

"The only way you can explain an interior minister removing the police chiefs working in an investigation regarding his own family is that the aim is to obstruct evidence," said Caliskan, who writes for the centrist newspaper Radikal.

"The prime minister thinks Turkish people are not very clever (but) he will be slapped hard at the ballot box."

Turkey's next parliamentary election is not until 2015. But with the local ballots looming, pollsters say the scandal's so-far modest erosion of AK's popular support could quicken.

In a fourth resignation on Wednesday, AK lawmaker Idris Naim Sahin, a former interior minister, told the party he was also stepping down, according to sources in his office.

The scandal has laid bare rivalry between Erdogan and Fethullah Gulen, a U.S.-based Turkish cleric whose Hizmet (Service) movement claims at least 1 million followers, including senior police officers and judges, and which runs schools and charities across Turkey and abroad.

While denying any role in the affair, Gulen described Erdogan as suffering "decayed thinking" after the premier portrayed himself as fending off a shadowy international plot.

In an apparent reference to Gulen, Erdogan said on Wednesday: "We would not allow certain organizations acting under the guise of religion but being used as the tools of certain countries to carry out an operation on our country."

(Writing by Dan Williams; Additional reporting by Humeyra Pamuk, Seda Sezer, Gulsen Solaker and Tulay Karadeniz; Editing by Alistair Lyon)

FILED UNDER:
We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (6)
captaintr wrote:
I wonder how you define Turkey to be flourished economically during the current government’s reign of 3 terms?

1-Did Turkish national debt decreased and erupted?

2-Is Turkish GDP per capitai ncreased in real terms in their terms?

3-Did the real time-on the street- inlation has been measured correctly and in consistent with the real people’ real income?

4-Did the Turkih economy at least managed to begin positive savings over the incomes or is is still foreign borrowing from the world?

5-What is the currecnt deficit level that proves the economy flourished?

Could someone give our nation and ou people how the above figures in reality and how oe can evaluate those figures as ”flourished”.

Last but not the least; so many people thinks and believes that the only flourished segment in Turkey is and only the ruling party,his family and relaties against none.

Please when you provide evaluations give us reality with proven data.
Regards
Captaintr

Dec 25, 2013 9:05am EST  --  Report as abuse
paintcan wrote:
No doubt the number of people involved in government graft is far higher than the list contains so far. If the highest were doing it – there must be thousands or tens of thousands of imitators.

It still won’t get all the buildings that have been put up under their rotten leadership strengthened in time for the next major quake in Istanbul. But maybe it’s a start?

Dec 25, 2013 11:45am EST  --  Report as abuse
paintcan wrote:
No doubt the number of people involved in government graft is far higher than the list contains so far. If the highest were doing it – there must be thousands or tens of thousands of imitators.

It still won’t get all the buildings that have been put up under their rotten leadership strengthened in time for the next major quake in Istanbul. But maybe it’s a start?

Dec 25, 2013 11:52am EST  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.