Accused Los Angeles airport gunman pleads not guilty

RANCHO CUCAMONGA, California Thu Dec 26, 2013 3:53pm EST

1 of 3. Paul Anthony Ciancia, 23, is questioned by U.S. Magistrate Judge David Bristow (L) in this courtroom sketch at West Valley Detention Center in Rancho Cucamonga, California, December 26, 2013.

Credit: Reuters/Bill Robes/POOL

Related Topics

RANCHO CUCAMONGA, California (Reuters) - The man accused of killing a federal security screener and wounding three other people at Los Angeles International Airport, pleaded not guilty on Thursday to charges of murder and attempted murder.

This was the second court appearance for Paul Anthony Ciancia, 23, in connection with the November 1 shooting spree that left him critically wounded after a gunfight with police.

Ciancia, who had a bandage on his neck, spoke softly in a hoarse voice during the arraignment and pleaded not guilty to all charges in an 11-count federal indictment against him. His family was not present at the hearing which was held in a detention facility.

Ciancia is accused of walking into Terminal 3 at the airport, removing a semi-automatic rifle from a bag and opening fire on an unarmed Transportation Security Administration officer standing at the entrance to a security checkpoint.

The TSA agent, Gerardo Hernandez, 39, was the first agent slain in the line of duty since the agency was created in the aftermath of the September 11, 2001, attacks.

Authorities say Ciancia then stalked past metal detectors through the checkpoint and into the airplane-boarding area, shooting and wounding two other TSA employees and a traveler before he was critically wounded in a gunfight with police at one of the world's busiest airports.

In addition to a single count of murder and two counts of attempted murder of federal officers, Ciancia was indicted on four counts of committing an act of violence at an international airport and four counts of firearms offenses.

The 5-foot-3, 110-pound Ciancia was somber and frequently touched the bandage as he sat before U.S. Magistrate Judge David Bristow. He wore a green jail jumpsuit and a gray hooded sweatshirt and was handcuffed and appeared to be shackled at the ankles for hearing.

Thom Mrozek, a spokesman for the U.S. attorney for the central district of California, declined to discuss Ciancia's wounds, citing a federal patient privacy law.

On December 4, Bristow ordered Ciancia held without bond after finding he posed a danger to the community and represented a potential flight risk.

Three charges in the indictment against Ciancia carry a maximum sentence of life in prison or the death penalty; federal prosecutors have not decided yet whether to seek capital punishment if Ciancia is convicted.

Ciancia's hearing was held at the West Valley Detention Center in Rancho Cucamonga, located east of Los Angeles in San Bernardino County, because that is where Ciancia is being treated for his injuries.

The detention center has facilities equipped to handle Ciancia's medical needs, said San Bernardino County Sheriff's Department spokeswoman Jodi Miller, whose agency keeps federal inmates under a contract with the U.S. government.

Ciancia is scheduled to appear in federal court in Los Angeles on January 27 for a pre-trial hearing.

(Reporting by Dana Feldman; Writing by Alex Dobuzinskis; Editing by Leslie Adler and Leslie Gevirtz)

FILED UNDER:
We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (13)
WhyMeLord wrote:
Innocent by reason of hatred of the TSA.
That should make TSA agents sleep better.
Maybe they’ll treat passengers better; maybe.

Dec 26, 2013 4:08pm EST  --  Report as abuse
CodyWilliams wrote:
how does one plead not guilty when it was all caught on camera? odd

Dec 26, 2013 4:13pm EST  --  Report as abuse
xwagner wrote:
Not guilty? Come on. Why didn’t they shoot this perp on the spot and save everybody time and effort?

Dec 26, 2013 4:29pm EST  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.