Netanyahu gloomy as Kerry returns for peace talks

JERUSALEM Thu Jan 2, 2014 1:58pm EST

1 of 5. U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry (C) walks upon his arrival at Ben Gurion Airport near Tel Aviv January 2, 2014.

Credit: Reuters/Brendan Smialowski/Pool

Related Topics

JERUSALEM (Reuters) - Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu offered a gloomy assessment of peace prospects with the Palestinians on Thursday as U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry began his 10th visit to the region in pursuit of a deal.

"There is growing doubt in Israel that the Palestinians are committed to peace," said Netanyahu, speaking with Kerry at his side and accusing Palestinian officials of orchestrating a campaign of "rampant" incitement against Israel.

Netanyahu specifically criticized Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas for the heroes' welcome he gave a group of Palestinian prisoners, most convicted of murdering Israelis, who were released from Israeli jails on Tuesday.

"To glorify the murderers of innocent women and men as heroes is an outrage," he said. The prisoner release was arranged as part of last year's U.S.-brokered package to revive peace talks.

In the days before Kerry's latest trip to Jerusalem, Palestinian leaders have likewise accused Israel of trying to sabotage the talks aimed at ending their decades-old conflict.

Kerry focused his remarks on a continued U.S. push toward a final peace agreement, which Washington hopes to achieve by the end of April, and his shorter-term pursuit of a framework deal that would pave the way for a permanent accord.

He said Israeli and Palestinian leaders were nearing the point, or were already at it, where they would have to make tough decisions, and he pledged to work with both sides more intensely to try to narrow differences on a framework agreement.

Guidelines in such an accord would address core issues such as the borders of a future Palestinian state, security, Palestinian refugees and the status of Jerusalem, Kerry said.

"It would create the fixed, defined parameters by which the parties would then know where they are going and what the end result can be," he said. "This will take time and it will take compromise from both sides, but an agreed framework would be a significant breakthrough."

Kerry seems to be trying to get both sides to make a series of compromises on the broad outlines of an agreement with the details to be filled in later -- a tall order in that neither may wish to make such tradeoffs without seeing the fine print.

The secretary of state, who plans to see Netanyahu and Abbas separately over the next three days, said he did not intend to impose U.S. ideas, but to "facilitate the parties' own efforts". Speaking to reporters on Tuesday, a senior U.S. State Department official said Kerry was not expecting a breakthrough during this trip.

FAR APART

On key issues in the conflict, leaders from both sides have sounded far apart this week.

Israeli Deputy Foreign Minister Zeev Elkin on Thursday rejected the creation of a Palestinian state based on the lines pre-dating the 1967 Six-Day War, in which Israel captured and occupied Gaza, East Jerusalem and the West Bank.

"The Jordan Valley must be under Israeli sovereignty forever," he said, referring to the border area with Jordan, from which Palestinians want a full Israeli withdrawal.

"The 1967 borders are Auschwitz borders," Ha'aretz newspaper quoted him as saying, suggesting that a return to the narrower boundaries that existed before the conflict would lead to the destruction of Israel.

On Tuesday, Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas renewed a call for all Israeli settlers and soldiers within the lands captured in 1967 to be withdrawn, saying he would not hesitate to reject a bad deal.

"We will say 'yes' to any ideas suggested to us which meet our rights. But we will not fear and will not hesitate for a moment ... to say 'no', whatever the pressure, to any proposal which detracts from or doesn't fulfill the higher national interests of our people," he said in a speech.

Palestinian chief negotiator Saeb Erekat last month said a framework agreement could allow the talks to be continued for another year. However, earlier this week, he said the U.S.-brokered talks were "failing", and threatened to haul Israel before the International Criminal Court.

(Additional reporting by Noah Browning in Ramallah; writing by Jeffrey Heller; Editing by Crispian Balmer and Mark Trevelyan)

FILED UNDER:
We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (47)
AZreb wrote:
TEN visits in under a year – think he might get the message? How many times have we heard, after one of the “talks”, that there is progress? How many times have we heard there is a “break-through”?

The Palestinians should know by now that the US backs Israel so if they are smart, they will look carefully at any plan from the US since it will be in favor of Israel.

Jan 02, 2014 8:41am EST  --  Report as abuse
Ittai wrote:
Palestinians are merely Jordanian nationals living in the liberated Judea and Samaria. There is no such nation as “Palestinians”. Those how call themselves “Palestinians” should be repatriated back to Jordanian.

Jan 02, 2014 8:46am EST  --  Report as abuse
rustic36 wrote:
There will ”NEVER” be peace in Israel ! Arafat had the best chance when Israel conceded to 95% of all his demands a number of years ago,and yet he walked away? The reason- – no one could explain short of a fear by him of assassination if he would have signed! The Palestinians do not want peace , they want the annihilation of Israel- – and that simply is NOT going to happen!

Jan 02, 2014 9:53am EST  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.

Pictures