Syria rebels push al Qaeda back; U.S. open to Iran role

AMMAN/JERUSALEM Sun Jan 5, 2014 7:53pm EST

1 of 2. Free Syrian Army fighters cheer during an anti-Syrian regime protest in Maarat Al-Nouman, Idlib, January 3, 2014. Picture taken January 3, 2014.

Credit: Reuters/Fadi Mashan

Related Video

Related Topics

AMMAN/JERUSALEM (Reuters) - Syrian rebel fighters loyal to al Qaeda ceded ground near the Turkish border to rival Islamists on Sunday, activists said, in what seemed to be a tactical withdrawal to end clashes between Syrian- and foreign-led opponents of President Bashar al-Assad.

As Syria's civil war gets ever more complex amid a broad regional confrontation between Sunni and Shi'ite Muslims, the United States raised the prospect of Assad's sponsor Iran, the Shi'ite power long at odds with Washington and its Sunni Arab allies, playing some role in this month's Syrian peace talks.

U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry said Tehran still should not take formal part in the peace conference scheduled to start on Lake Geneva on January 22 because it had not endorsed a 2012 accord calling for a new Syrian leadership. But he said there might be ways that Iran could "contribute from the sidelines".

There is little prospect of a rapid end to the Syrian conflict but the resurgence in Iraq of mutual enemy al Qaeda, and a recent rapprochement with the new Iranian president, have raised speculation about a common effort between the United States and Tehran to contain instability in the region.

Kerry, visiting Jerusalem, pledged to help Iraq's Shi'ite-led government fight al Qaeda but said Washington was not considering sending U.S. troops, two years after they withdrew.


Syrian opposition activists said the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIL), allied to al Qaeda and featuring foreign jihadists among its commanders, had pulled back on Sunday from strongpoints including al-Dana and Atma in Idlib province and that fighters from the Nusra Front and Ahrar al-Sham moved in.

"The Islamic State is pulling out without a fight. Its fighters are taking their weapons and heavy guns," activist Firas Ahmad said. He added that the ISIL fighters headed in the direction of Aleppo, where Assad's troops have stepped up pressure on rebel forces who captured the city 18 months ago.

Another activist, Abdallah al-Sheikh, said that some Syrian ISIL fighters had stayed in place but switched allegiance to the Nusra Front, whose commanders are mostly Syrian rather than foreign. Nusra coordinates with the Islamic Front, a coalition of Syrian Islamist brigades that includes Ahrar al-Sham.

Syrian opposition supporters and diplomats said that, despite days of skirmishing in the northwest between ISIL and other rebel factions, a broad alliance involving these groups seemed to be holding in the desert east of the country.

"There is certainly competition between ISIL and the other Islamist militants, but it does not appear there is full-scale confrontation," a Middle Eastern diplomat said.

The strength of radical Islamists, nearly three years after popular revolt broke out against Assad, has caused Western powers to hold back on practical support for the rebels despite endorsing the goal, shared with Sunni Arab states such as Saudi Arabia and Qatar, of overthrowing the Syrian president.


Across the border in Iraq, ISIL seized key towns last week, confronting Sunni tribal forces and the Iraqi government and making their greatest territorial gains since U.S. troops ended a nine-year occupation of Iraq in December 2011.

On Sunday, Baghdad officials met Sunni tribal leaders to seek their help against a bid by ISIL to consolidate a hold on desert territory straddling the Iraqi-Syrian frontier and Iraq's U.S.-armed air force struck the city of Ramadi, killing 25 Islamists, according to local officials.

Iraqi Prime Minister Nuri al-Maliki has secured pledges of more U.S. military aid, despite concerns in Washington that his government has failed to share power with the once-dominant Sunni minority and has helped Iran channel supplies to Assad.

In the eastern Syrian province of Raqqa, Sunni Islamist activist Khaled Abu Alwalid said that the presence of Iraqi Shi'ite militia fighters in Syria was galvanising a common front against them by ISIL and other Islamist factions.

"This is a religious war encompassing Iraq, Syria and Lebanon," Alwalid said.

Like Iraq, Lebanon has seen violence linked to the Syrian war, and its Hezbollah militia, backed by Iran, has sent fighters into Syria to help Assad. There were clashes on Sunday in the Lebanese city of Tripoli between Sunnis and members of the Shi'ite-linked Alawite sect to which Assad belongs.


Western powers preparing for the peace conference in Montreux later this month have been pressing other opposition groups, friendlier to Western interests, to resolve their own factional disputes and take a full role in negotiations.

The Syrian National Coalition (SNC), a Western-backed umbrella body formed largely by exiles, was meeting in Istanbul to elect new leaders and vote, probably on Monday, on whether to take part in talks with Assad's representatives.

Ahmad al-Jarba was re-elected as SNC leader for a second six-month term, defeating former Syrian prime minister Riyad Hijab, a senior coalition member told Reuters.

Many in the SNC are concerned that it could jeopardise what support it enjoys inside Syria by taking part in the talks with Assad's delegates at what is known by the U.N. organizers as "Geneva 2" - a sequel to international talks in Geneva in 2012.

While the Islamic Front and others fighting in Syria have ruled out negotiations, the SNC has said it would take part on certain conditions - though few of these, such as the release of prisoners and more aid to rebel areas, have been met.

Nonetheless, senior SNC member Anas Abdah told Reuters the Coalition was under pressure to take part in talks, if only to avoid losing the goodwill and support of Western powers: "The only clear political option is Geneva 2," he said.

"If we don't explore this option, the international community might lose interest and not do anything."

Monzer Makhous, the SNC envoy in Paris, said: "There cannot be a political solution from Geneva because the terms set out by the international community at previous meetings have not been met ... But at this stage we have no other option."

(Additional reporting by Dasha Afanasieva in Istanbul; Writing by Alastair Macdonald; Editing by Kevin Liffey)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see
Comments (6)
RMax304823 wrote:
Two years ago, Richard Engel and his crew were kidnapped and held in the Middle East. Who done it? Here’s Wikipedia’s description.

“On December 13, 2012, Engel and crew members Aziz Akyavas, John Kooistra, Ghazi Balkiz, and Ian Rivers were abducted in Syria. They were moved to various locations throughout the time they were held captive and were psychologically tortured. Engel and his crew said they believed that a Shabiha group loyal to al-Assad were behind the abduction, and that the crew was freed by the Ahrar al-Sham groups five days later.

According to Jamie Dettmer, writing in The Daily Beast, this narrative was later questioned by unnamed sources, who believed Engel and his team had actually been kidnapped by rogue rebel groups opposed to the Assad regime.”

Nobody knows who anybody else is. Neighbor is fighting neighbor. Each makes up its own name, and then a rogue group with a different name splits off. Many are described by the press as “al Qaeda-linked” but there is no common definition for the descriptor.

What a madhouse.

Jan 05, 2014 9:58pm EST  --  Report as abuse
Jingan wrote:
Can you read Reuters in Syria? does ALQuida read Reuters……I do not understand why you guys post “news” relevant only to defense industry and socio cultural region that has nothing to do with western civilization.

What is the point of this middle eastern barrage of senseless “news”?

Jan 05, 2014 10:02pm EST  --  Report as abuse
StephanLarose wrote:
Iran is a natural power in the region and was a democracy until the U.S. went and overthrew their democratically elected president Mossadegh and installed the brutal Shah dictatorship.

It would be wise for the U.S. to abandon an “ally” like Saudi Arabia, responsible for 9/11 and for promulgating terrorism through its maddrassas and financed/organized by its intelligence services. A much better partner for stability in the region is Iran, which is itself tremendously multi-ethnic and has a great stake in region stability for the sake of its own internal stability.

The most difficult element to control will be Israel, a highly aggressive, racist regime armed with an enormous stockpile of illegal nuclear weapons. Israel has stated publicly it will strike with these nukes and kill millions on the slightest of pretenses if it “feels threatened” and has used these weapons to blackmail the U.S. to apply its military forces on Israel’s behalf in the past. With its apartheid policies and daily war crimes, Israel is more of a foreign policy nightmare than an ally, especially when considering how much Israel manipulates U.S. politics, the amount of spying they do on the U.S., the amount of money they’ve received from U.S. taxpayers (well over 100 billion up to date), and the sensitive U.S. military technologies they transfer to adversaries like China.

On the other hand, Iran has attacked nobody for over 200 years and the Ayatollah has issued a fatwa against nuclear weapons. The U.S. should force Israel to the table to make the Middle East a nuclear weapons free zone.

Jan 05, 2014 11:18pm EST  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.

Full focus