Google, other big companies to pay to use San Francisco bus stops

SAN FRANCISCO Mon Jan 6, 2014 8:23pm EST

A bus driver, with workers from the technology industry, looks on from his bus as it is blocked during a protest against rising costs of living in San Francisco December 20, 2013. REUTERS/Beck Diefenbach

A bus driver, with workers from the technology industry, looks on from his bus as it is blocked during a protest against rising costs of living in San Francisco December 20, 2013.

Credit: Reuters/Beck Diefenbach

Related Topics

SAN FRANCISCO (Reuters) - Google Inc and other big technology companies that rely on private commuter buses to ferry workers around will now pay the city of San Francisco fees to use city bus stops, the city announced at a news conference on Monday.

Companies using commuter buses, which some see as a symbol of unwelcome gentrification in San Francisco, will end up paying the city around $1.5 million over the next 18 months as part of a pilot program, Mayor Ed Lee said.

The program will institute a permit system for the private commuter buses, which carry an estimated 45,000 workers daily between their homes in San Francisco and dozens of technology companies based in Silicon Valley, south of the city.

The commuter buses will be limited to 200 specific public bus stops, out of 2,500 in the San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency system, the city said. The vehicles will have to operate under guidelines such as yielding to Muni buses, pulling to the front of the bus zone to make more room for other buses, and avoiding steep and narrow streets.

"Shuttles are here to stay," Lee said. "They've got to be coordinated and better aligned with our municipal system."

The plan, will go before the SMTA's board for a vote later this month, was created with input from the tech companies that offer the shuttle services to their employees, city officials said. They include Microsoft Corp Apple Inc and others.

"We see this pilot program as a good first step," said Veronica Bell, manager for public policy and government affairs for Google, at the news conference. In early December, Google was the target of the first of a handful of protests against the technology buses. Protests against an Apple bus and another Google bus followed.

The fees will be calculated based on a company's usage of SFMTA bus stops, which SFMTA Director of Transportation Ed Reiskin said would result in charges of around $1 per stop per day. That creates fees averaging about $100,000 per company that uses the buses, or about $1.5 million total for the city.

The fees will cover the SFMTA's cost of running the pilot program, as well as some investment to upgrade selected stops. Improvements might include better signs or bigger shelters, Reiskin said.

City rules forbid the city from collecting more than the cost of providing the service, officials said.

The buses have become among the most visible symbols of what some complain is the technology-driven gentrification of San Francisco, with young, well-paid tech workers forcing out less affluent residents. In addition, critics say some city policies, including tax breaks, are too generous to the technology industry.

But San Francisco Supervisor Scott Wiener said blaming technology workers for city problems was the wrong approach.

"We need to stop politicizing peoples' ability to get to work," he said at the news conference. "We need to stop stereotyping and scapegoating and demonizing people who work in the tech sector."

Eviction Free San Francisco, one of the groups that has protested against the buses, said the tech industry must help the city retain its diversity, culture and affordability.

"We are prepared to demand more of City Hall if it appears that Mayor Lee's plan is not realistically aggressive enough to address the concerns of poor, working, and middle-class San Franciscans," said Eviction Free San Francisco organizer Jennifer Cust in a statement.

Commuter-bus advocates have said the buses ease traffic on already clogged highways as workers give up driving to ride the buses, which usually have plush seats and Wi-Fi.

Opponents have said the buses crowd municipal bus stops and remove potential customers from cash-strapped public transportation systems, including regional rail services.

Protests, which have involved demonstrators surrounding buses and stopping them from moving for stretches of around 30 minutes, started only last month. But city officials said they have been working with tech companies on policy recommendations for about a year.

(Reporting by Sarah McBride. Editing by Andre Grenon)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see
Comments (3)
thebriang wrote:
Why dont the rich people just ride the normal bus like everyone else.
Oh, thats right, they dont want to sit next to those poor people.

Jan 06, 2014 8:08pm EST  --  Report as abuse
rustic36 wrote:
You will have to excuse me- -I don’t get it? Isn’t it the ”plan’ of the liberals that mass transportation is what is needed in this country? And aren’t ”bus” systems set up to do that- – IE take people from point A to point B so they don’t use their cars and HURT the earth? And now the City of SFO wants to penalize the potential riders because ”they” – - studied, did well in school, got JOB with a good company, are paying taxes to support those who do NOT work, and want to use- – ”PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION” SO THEY DON’T hurt THE PLANET- – and the LIBERALS are upset? ? ? ? ? REALLY? ? ? One more time – - this is about CLASS WARFARE? ? ? ARE ”LIBERALS” – - – EVER HAPPY? ? ? ? ? ? ?

Jan 07, 2014 6:45am EST  --  Report as abuse
TheSleevePSU wrote:
I think you might be missing the point entirely. The buses described in this article are not public transportation. They are a private shuttle service provided by tech companies like Apple and Google as an incentive for hiring and retaining top talent. However, these buses are using public bus stops. The problem, therefore, is that they are effectively making use of public infrastructure for their private services. The proposed solution is having them pay a permit fee for having access to the public bus stops. The permits would then go to subsidize the city’s existing public transportation.

I personally think that the protests against these buses are misplaced. The companies should be able to provide a private shuttle to their employees if they wish to do so, and of course they should pay the city for using its public infrastructure.

In other words, this has nothing to do with liberals, public transportation, class warfare, or any of the other things you’re blathering about.

Jan 07, 2014 1:48pm EST  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.