U.S. judge blocks Ohio's new election law

CLEVELAND Tue Jan 7, 2014 6:25pm EST

Related Topics

CLEVELAND (Reuters) - A U.S. judge in Ohio on Tuesday blocked a recently passed state law that would have effectively kept a Libertarian candidate from challenging the sitting Republican governor this fall.

U.S. District Judge Michael Watson issued a preliminary injunction on legislation that created more stringent qualifications for minority parties and required them to start over in the nomination process in order to have candidates on November ballots.

Watson wrote that a number of minority party candidates have already collected signatures, filed their nominating petitions and paid the required fees to participate in the 2014 primary election.

The Ohio law is "patently unfair" and "the Ohio Legislature moved the proverbial goalpost in the midst of the game," Watson wrote.

Charlie Earl, a Libertarian who plans to challenge Governor John Kasich in November, was one of four parties challenging the lawsuit.

According to a 2013 directive from the Ohio Secretary of State, smaller parties including the Libertarian Party of Ohio were automatically granted access to the primary and general elections in 2014.

However, the law would have voided the parties' existing nominating petitions and required third-party candidates to start collecting more than 20,000 signatures by a February 5 deadline.

Kasich signed the legislation in November, after it was passed by a Republican-led legislature.

When Kasich defeated incumbent Governor Ted Strickland, a Democrat, in 2010, neither candidate received more than 50 percent of the vote, as minority party candidates captured four percent.

Ohio Democrats dubbed the legislation "The John Kasich Re-Election Protection Act," claiming it was passed to protect the current governor's chances in light of growing criticism from the state's Tea Party conservatives over his expansion of Medicaid under the Affordable Care Act.

Two Democrats are running in the primary for the right to challenge Kasich in 2014: Cuyahoga County Executive Ed FitzGerald and Hamilton County Commissioner Todd Portune.

(Editing by Brendan O'Brien and Gunna Dickson)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (6)
Bakhtin wrote:
Republicans rigging the election process in their favour. Again. Why are they so frightened of fair elections?

Jan 07, 2014 9:18pm EST  --  Report as abuse
4825 wrote:
@Bakhtin- Seems obvious to me that it is the democrats that are afraid of fair elections since they are the ones that are constantly fighting voter ID in states that have made it law. We all know voter ID is as fair as it gets for all citizens.

Jan 07, 2014 10:56pm EST  --  Report as abuse
Bakhtin wrote:
“We all know”?? You seem to have some difficulty distinguishing Fox rhetoric from fact. Are you seriously saying that countries such as UK, Australia, New Zealand, and Denmark – none of which require voter ID – don’t have fair elections? If they do, then real-life proves you wrong again. If you think they don’t…

How about Libya? They have voter IDs Libya, in your opinion, a wonderful democracy with election that are ‘as fair as it gets’?

Two big issues with voter ID: one is that a fair vote requires anonymity and voter ID is the exact opposite of that. One has to wonder why Republicans are so desperate to know who is voting.

The second is that a fair vote is – by definition – universal. ID cards are a back-door to restricting that as they – also by definition – restrict the vote *and* allow local ID criteria to be applied in response to voting results.

Of course you Republicans favour voter ID. It is a tool to rig the voting demographic in Republican favour.

Jan 07, 2014 11:23pm EST  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.