All Norwegians become crown millionaires, in oil saving landmark

Wed Jan 8, 2014 12:21pm EST

Related Topics

* Fund owns around 1 percent of world stocks

* Reaches equivalent of 1 mln crowns each for first time

* Norway is world's number seven oil exporter

By Alister Doyle

OSLO, Jan 8 (Reuters) - Everyone in Norway became a theoretical crown millionaire on Wednesday in a milestone for the world's biggest sovereign wealth fund that has ballooned thanks to high oil and gas prices.

Set up in 1990, the fund owns around 1 percent of the world's stocks, as well as bonds and real estate from London to Boston, making the Nordic nation an exception when others are struggling under a mountain of debts.

A preliminary counter on the website of the central bank, which manages the fund, rose to 5.11 trillion crowns ($828.66 billion), fractionally more than a million times Norway's most recent official population estimate of 5,096,300.

It was the first time it reached the equivalent of a million crowns each, central bank spokesman Thomas Sevang said.

Not that Norwegians will be able to access or spend the money, squirrelled away for a rainy day for them and future generations. Norway has resisted the temptation to splurge all the windfall since striking oil in the North Sea in 1969.

Finance Minister Siv Jensen told Reuters the fund, called the Government Pension Fund Global, had helped iron out big, unpredictable swings in oil and gas prices. Norway is the world's number seven oil exporter.

"Many countries have found that temporary large revenues from natural resource exploitation produce relatively short-lived booms that are followed by difficult adjustments," she said in an email.

The fund, equivalent to 183 percent of 2013 gross domestic product, is expected to peak at 220 percent around 2030.

"The fund is a success in the sense that parliament has managed to put aside money for the future. There are many examples of countries that have mot managed that," said Oeystein Doerum, chief economist at DNB Markets.

Norway has sought to avoid the boom and bust cycle by investing the cash abroad, rather than at home. Governments can spend 4 percent of the fund in Norway each year, slightly more than the annual return on investment.

Still, in Norway, oil wealth may have made the state reluctant to make reforms or cut subsidies unthinkable elsewhere. Farm subsidies allow farmers, for instance, to keep dairy cows in heated barns in the Arctic.

It may also have made some Norwegians reluctant to work. "One in five people of working age receives some kind of social insurance instead of working," Doerum said, despite an official unemployment rate of 3.3 percent. (Reporting by Alister Doyle; Editing by Alison Williams)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see
Comments (5)
74LS08 wrote:
It’s nice to know that somewhere on this planet there is a country where government actually cares about every member of the society…

Jan 09, 2014 12:04am EST  --  Report as abuse
stevieod wrote:
You would think that America would do this for its citizens. But instead, it is funding corrupt governments, the corrupt DoD, anything but helping Americans.

The greed and corruption in the United States of America has grown to epidemic proportions, and is virtually unstoppable by American citizens. What a sad way for a country to end.

Jan 09, 2014 2:54am EST  --  Report as abuse
ELH_HUN10 wrote:
In Norway, the marginal tax rate on the excess return within the petroeum sector is 78%. Most of any money that was distributed, would just come back to the government. Sounds like they know that the cash cow will not live forever. But, with their tax system, the government will keep control of the money whether it is distributed or not.

Jan 09, 2014 11:09am EST  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.