UPDATE 2-Top U.S. court refuses to hear appeal of Monsanto seed case

Mon Jan 13, 2014 3:49pm EST

WASHINGTON Jan 13 (Reuters) - The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday declined to hear an appeal by organic farmers and others seeking to require Monsanto Co to promise never to sue farmers if their fields inadvertently have plants containing the company's patented genetically modified traits.

A company lawyer said Monsanto had not sued for inadvertent use of its biotech seeds and did not plan to, but that it would not make a blanket promise to that effect. Lower courts held that none of those who sued had been injured.

The Organic Seed Growers and Trade Association and a group of dozens of organic and conventional family farmers, seed companies and public advocacy interests sued Monsanto in March 2011.

The suit sought to prohibit the company from suing farmers whose fields became inadvertently contaminated with corn, soybeans, cotton, canola and other crops containing Monsanto's genetic modifications.

Monsanto has genetically engineered its specialty seeds to withstand dousings of glyphosate, the main ingredient of the company's Roundup herbicide. The company charges a premium to farmers for use of its seeds and prohibits unauthorized plantings.

But there have been several cases in which the patented genetic traits have been found to have mixed into fields where farmers had not purchased or planted the biotech seeds. Monsanto routinely sues farmers who it says intentionally plant its biotech seeds without paying for the technology, but it has said it will not sue farmers whose fields are accidentally contaminated.

In the suit filed by the organic and conventional growers, the group asked Monsanto for a pre-emptive pledge not to sue them since they do not use the biotech seeds. But Monsanto refused to do so saying a "blanket covenant" not to sue any present or future member of the organizations would enable "virtually anyone to commit intentional infringement."

The biotech crops are widely used throughout the United States.

The group of Monsanto critics lost in district court and in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. The appeals court decision now stands.

"Monsanto never has and has committed it never will sue if our patented seed or traits are found in a farmer's field as a result of inadvertent means," said Kyle McClain, the company's chief litigation counsel.

"The lower courts agreed there was no controversy between the parties," McClain added, "and the Supreme Court's decision not to review the case brings closure on this matter."

Daniel Ravicher, executive director of the Public Patent Foundation and lead counsel to the plaintiffs, said in a statement that the high court's action was disappointing but that "it should not be misinterpreted as meaning that Monsanto has the right to bring such suits."

"Indeed, in light of the court of appeals decision, Monsanto may not sue any contaminated farmer for patent infringement if the level of contamination is less than 1 percent."

Monsanto shares were down 1.5 percent at $111.30 just before the close of trading on the New York Stock Exchange.

The case is Organic Seed Growers and Trade Association, et al., v. Monsanto Company, et al. Supreme Court Case No. 13-303.

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (2)
shorebird wrote:
“Monsanto never has and has committed it never will sue if our patented seed or traits are found in a farmer’s field as a result of inadvertent means,” said Kyle McClain, the company’s chief litigation counsel.

– Excuse me, when exactly does not telling the truth become an outright lie from legal counsel, repeated in print?? All anyone needs to do is review the case of Percy Schmieser in Canada, a conventional canola farmer who was sued by Monsanto in the year 2000 – in 1997, a neighbor’s gmo canola crop trucked to market, the truck lost its cover tarp and seed blew into his field.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Monsanto_Canada_Inc._v._Schmeiser

Jan 14, 2014 10:10pm EST  --  Report as abuse
MarkDonners wrote:
Monsanto is factually a global terror organization.. one of the worst. They will poison and murder your families and children for generations without a hint of remorse. They will destroy the future of the earth forever by laying waste to entire countries for their profits. “Biotech” monsters like Monsanto, Syngenta, Dow, Bayer, Dupont are working hand in hand to murder and destroy for profits. Their management is criminal and pure evil and belong nowhere else than in a maximum security cell for the rest of their criminal lives. They must be stopped at all costs

Jan 15, 2014 4:38am EST  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.