No sign yet Iran sanctions bill will come to U.S. Senate vote

WASHINGTON Tue Jan 14, 2014 5:51pm EST

U.S. Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (R-NV) walks to meet reporters after their weekly party caucus lunch meeting at the U.S. Capitol in Washington, January 14, 2014. REUTERS/Jonathan Ernst

U.S. Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (R-NV) walks to meet reporters after their weekly party caucus lunch meeting at the U.S. Capitol in Washington, January 14, 2014.

Credit: Reuters/Jonathan Ernst

Related Topics

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid made clear on Tuesday he has no immediate plan to allow a vote on a bill that would slap new sanctions on Iran over its nuclear program, even as backers promised to keep up their efforts to win more support.

Fifty-nine of the 100 senators - including 16 of President Barack Obama's fellow Democrats - support the bill, despite Obama's warning that its passage could jeopardize delicate international negotiations to curb Iran's nuclear program.

New Jersey Senator Robert Menendez, the Democratic chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, is a lead sponsor of the measure, which has caused friction between the White House and some Democrats in Congress.

Iran warned that it would back away from the negotiations if any new sanctions were passed. Obama promised to veto the measure if it passes both the Senate and House of Representatives.

Asked when he might allow a Senate vote on the legislation, Reid acknowledged the support, but also noted that 10 Democratic committee chairs had written to him opposing it.

"Let's see how this plays out," he told reporters.

"The legislative process is working forward here. I am going to sit and be as fair an umpire as I can," Reid, a Nevada Democrat, said.

Kentucky Senator Mitch McConnell, the top Republican in the Senate, told reporters he believed the vote should take place, and suggested that backers might be able to muster the 67 votes necessary to override a presidential veto.

"We're going to continue to continue to press in order to allow a vote on an issue that obviously enjoys the support of a very large bipartisan majority here in the Senate," he said.

A weekend agreement to begin implementing a temporary nuclear deal between Iran and world powers on January 20 helped reinforce the argument that the sanctions bill should not go ahead while negotiations continue, even though it would not actually impose the new restrictions unless Iran failed to comply with the interim agreement.

'SECRET SIDE DEAL'

But backers of the bill said on Tuesday reports that the Obama administration has negotiated a "secret side deal" with Iran on the future of its nuclear program underscored the importance of doing everything possible to clamp down on Tehran.

"We call on the Obama Administration to clarify this situation immediately and ensure that members of Congress are fully and promptly informed about its nuclear diplomacy with Iran," Republican Senators John McCain and Lindsey Graham, both sanctions bill co-sponsors, said in a statement.

The White House said there is no secret agreement, merely that the documentation associated with the interim agreement has not yet been released.

"We will make the text available to the Congress and the public, but we must work with the parties on when and in what format the information will be released. And we hope to do that soon," White House spokesman Jay Carney told reporters during a daily news briefing.

Olli Heinonen, a former deputy director general at the U.N.'s International Atomic Energy Agency, said it was not surprising that a document from the agreement was not immediately released to the public.

"Have we had these kinds of understandings before? Actually I think so," Heinonen told reporters in a teleconference on Tuesday hosted by The Israel Project advocacy group.

He said the document probably has two parts; half on the undertakings at Iran's nuclear installations and centrifuges, and the other on the timing of sanctions relief.

The 1994 agreed framework between Washington and North Korea over the Asian country's nuclear power plants contained "certain understandings" that were never officially disclosed to the public, Heinonen said.

(Additional reporting by Timothy Gardner, Steve Holland and Richard Cowan; editing by Meredith Mazzilli)

FILED UNDER:
We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (2)
AHLambauer wrote:
This Menendez-Bill draft seems to push the president out of the constitution by rendering him Iran’s advocatus diaboli. Moreover it neglects every principle of international law concerning sovereignty and freedom of other nations.

US-Congress is recommended reading article VI of the constitution, where treaties (and also the UN-Charter) are declared top laws of the land, what is binding congress, too.

There was never ever any evidence that Iran reneged on its NPT duties: only assumptions and assertions.

But international law principles and collectiveness of enforcement actions, which both are set off in the charter, require a clear and undoubtfully existing infringement of a right by the sanctioned nation.

It’s solely horrible who US-Congress is on the point of raping inernational law, if it would adopt this bill.

Jan 15, 2014 7:05am EST  --  Report as abuse
AHLambauer wrote:
Really sad, that such a great nation, as US is, ignores international law!

Jan 15, 2014 8:52am EST  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.