U.S. Senate panel to criticize State Department over Benghazi response

WASHINGTON Tue Jan 14, 2014 9:56pm EST

An interior view of the U.S. consulate, which was attacked and set on fire by gunmen, in Benghazi September 12, 2012. REUTERS/Esam Al-Fetori

An interior view of the U.S. consulate, which was attacked and set on fire by gunmen, in Benghazi September 12, 2012.

Credit: Reuters/Esam Al-Fetori

Related Topics

U.S. Secret Service provide security for President Barack Obama in Pensacola, Florida, June 15, 2010. REUTERS/Jim Young

Protecting the President

The Secret Service detail surrounding President Obama.  Slideshow 

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - A report by the Senate Intelligence Committee to be released on Wednesday was expected to criticize the State Department for inadequate security at the U.S. diplomatic post in Benghazi, Libya, when it suffered a deadly attack on September 11, 2012.

Sources familiar with the findings said the report, which had bipartisan approval, found that in the previous months U.S. intelligence agencies repeatedly warned about possible attacks in Benghazi, but the State Department paid too little attention.

The U.S. ambassador to Libya, Christopher Stevens, and three other U.S. government personnel were killed when militants stormed the diplomatic post and a nearby CIA base over the course of several hours.

The Benghazi attack became a political flashpoint in Washington in the run-up to the 2012 election, with Republicans arguing that President Barack Obama tried to play down its significance as he campaigned for a second term.

The sources said that report heavily criticized the State Department for security arrangements at the diplomatic compound, saying they were nowhere near adequate to deal with the threat militants were known to pose.

The sources said the report had little criticism of the CIA's performance during and after the attack. The agency helped evacuate dozens of U.S. personnel from the Libyan city.

The committee report raised some questions about whether the U.S. military could have been better prepared to send an emergency force to Benghazi to help in the rescue, the sources said. But they said the military's performance on the night of the attack was not harshly criticized.

A spokeswoman for the Department of Defense, Navy Commander Amy Derrick-Frost, said the department had not seen the report.

But she said: "The Department of Defense continues to review the lessons learned from the tragedy in Benghazi. As we continue to implement the recommendations from the Accountability Review Board, we are in a much better position to respond today should a similar attack occur. The department's response to the embassy evacuation in Juba, South Sudan, is an example of our improved preparedness."

A State Department official said: "There have been dozens of reports, hearings and briefings on this issue. The facts are well-known, and we have continuously worked closely with Congress to ensure transparency."

"The Department is focused on preventing another tragedy like this one, and we are making progress to implement each of the ARB's recommendations, including work to expand the corps of Diplomatic Security personnel, enhance interagency coordination to address threat information, expand the Marine Security Guard program, and accelerate projects to build and upgrade secure facilities," the official said.

The Senate committee was expected to make public a 58-page version of its report on Wednesday, although the document was expected to include redactions. In addition to the report's main narrative, sources said Democrats and Republicans had included their own "additional views" on the committee inquiry.

The CIA declined to comment pending the report's release.

(Reporting by Mark Hosenball; Editing by David Storey, Leslie Adler, Peter Cooney and Eric Walsh)

FILED UNDER:
We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (7)
Bighammerman wrote:
It is somewhat pleasing that an investigation found the obvious discrepancies with the State Department. The big issue is that Obama, Clinton, Rice and their folks covered up the reality of the disaster for the purpose of self preservation. Obama’s actions regarding this cover-up should resolve itself with a Presidential Impeachment and removal from office. Obama, Rice and Clinton’s performance were despicable in this cover-up and the fact that they blocked the information from members of Congress is criminal. It can only make one think about the other disasters occurring during Obama’s tenure and their cover-ups. Information was held back in the IRS scandal and also fast and Furious where Holder was held in contempt of congress. It’s long past time for Obama, Holder and Rice resign. It’s long past time that Lois Lerner forfeits her pension for not answering questions being asked by congress. It is long past time that the U.S is led by a president that really cares about the country. This person would not bear the name Clinton or Obama. We deserve better.

Jan 14, 2014 11:20pm EST  --  Report as abuse
Art16 wrote:
The House Armed Services Committee Examined Actions Of Military Chain Of Command Before, During, and After Attack and has released declassified but somewhat redacted transcripts of their hearings today. They can be found here: http://armedservices.house.gov/index.cfm/2014/1/declassified-transcripts-of-benghazi-briefings-released

It will be interesting to compare what the Senate Panel has to say with the House Armed Services investigation on the same subject.

Jan 14, 2014 11:29pm EST  --  Report as abuse
Speaker2 wrote:
@bighammerman, what coverup? There was no coverup? Impeachment not going to happen.

On the other hand in the new budget proposal, the Republicans have cut more spending for state department security budgets… Again!

Jan 15, 2014 1:08am EST  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.

Retirement Road Map