Amazon.com workers reject unionization in Delaware vote

SEATTLE Thu Jan 16, 2014 4:41am EST

A box from Amazon.com is pictured on the porch of a house in Golden, Colorado July 23, 2008. REUTERS/Rick Wilking

A box from Amazon.com is pictured on the porch of a house in Golden, Colorado July 23, 2008.

Credit: Reuters/Rick Wilking

Related Topics

SEATTLE (Reuters) - A small group of Amazon.com Inc technicians at a distribution center in Delaware voted on Wednesday not to join a union, marking a victory for the U.S. online retailer which is strongly opposed to any kind of third-party representation for its employees.

A group of equipment maintenance and repair technicians voted 21 to 6 not to join the International Association of Machinists and Aerospace Workers (IAM), in results published late on Wednesday.

The vote was a symbolic test of Amazon's employee relations policies, but did not affect the vast majority of the 1,500 or so packers and shippers who work at the Middletown, Delaware facility, one of more than 40 distribution centers in the United States.

It does mean however, that under U.S. National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) rules, there cannot be another vote on unionization at the facility for one year.

"Our employees have made it clear that they prefer a direct connection with Amazon," said Mary Osako, an Amazon spokeswoman, in an emailed statement.

John Carr, a representative of the IAM, said Amazon had worked behind the scenes to sway workers.

"The workers at Amazon faced intense pressure from managers and anti-union consultants hired to suppress this organizing drive," said Carr, adding that the union will continue to work with the Amazon technicians with the aim of organizing union representation.

Like its brick-and-mortar rival Wal-Mart Stores Inc, Seattle-based Amazon discourages any kind of union activity at its operations. In turn, labor groups are making efforts to organize in the retail sector.

On Wednesday, the NLRB issued a complaint against Wal-Mart alleging the world's largest retailer violated labor laws in 14 states by taking action against striking workers. Wal-Mart says its actions were valid.

Amazon has not so far faced much pressure in the United States, but late last year more than 1,000 of its workers in Germany went on strike as part of a long-running pay dispute and have vowed to continue industrial actions this year. Some 1,000 Amazon employees in Germany also signed a petition opposing unionization.

The company has also faced bad publicity after the BBC broadcast a documentary last year on the rigors of working inside an Amazon delivery center, which can involve walking up to 11 miles a day at peak times picking items off shelves.

Amazon has stressed that workers at its centers are relatively well paid, safe, and get training on the job.

"The top priority of our fulfillment center network is safety. It's safer to work in the Amazon fulfillment network than in a department store," said Amazon's Osako.

(Reporting by Bill Rigby in Seattle, Dhanya Skariachan in New York; Editing by Nick Zieminski and Matt Driskill)

FILED UNDER:
We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (4)
RoyceO wrote:
Good for them! I have despised every union shop I’ve worked in!

Jan 16, 2014 12:29am EST  --  Report as abuse
JustProduce wrote:
Why when employees vote against being unionized do unions call it sabotage while a vote for unionization is called having employee voices heard? This sort of commentary implies that employees are stupid when making a decision against the interests of the unions.
As a consumer, I see unions as groups that make products more expensive, detain product innovation and add no value to what I buy at all. To me, these are organizations from a different era who are just looking for new income sources to keep paying for their very expensive buildings and standard of living. And I have seen their buildings; these are not the low cost worker-aid they claim to be.
I applaud Amazon’s workers. Amazon has made what I consume more affordable, at much better delivery times and availability. I ask that they keep innovating and ignore dirty middle-man tactics from unions.

Jan 16, 2014 8:17am EST  --  Report as abuse
willich6 wrote:
Its impossible to name an industry in the last 50 years where unions have not brought great harm to the companies involved, bankruptcies, unfunded pensions, raised prices for consumers, caused off-shoring, allowed in foreign owned competitors, delayed innovation and introduction of new technologies, and ultimately destroyed the very jobs they were trying to protect.
That’s why unions ‘buy’ so many politicians – protection – plain and simple.
That’s why unions are so strongly opposed to Trade Treaties like NAFTA or the new Asian/Pacific Treaty that is needed to enable more trade (more economic growth) in the 21st century – threat of competition.
THat’s why unions continue to lose membership every year; its why when you stop forcing union members to have mandatory union dues withheld from their paychecks 50% of members jump ship.. They are dinosaurs overdue for the trash heap of history.

Jan 17, 2014 8:47am EST  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.