Kerry insists no place for Assad in Syria's future

WASHINGTON Fri Jan 17, 2014 1:16pm EST

Men ride a motorbike past buildings damaged by what activists said was shelling by forces loyal to Syria's President Bashar al-Assad in Daraya, near Damascus January 15, 2014. REUTERS/Hussam Zeen

Men ride a motorbike past buildings damaged by what activists said was shelling by forces loyal to Syria's President Bashar al-Assad in Daraya, near Damascus January 15, 2014.

Credit: Reuters/Hussam Zeen

Related Topics


Under the Iron Dome

Sirens sound as rockets land deep inside Israel.  Slideshow 

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry insisted on Friday that President Bashar al-Assad has no place in Syria's future and he said the United States had options to step up pressure on him.

Kerry will lead a U.S. delegation to Switzerland next week for peace talks between the Syrian government and rebels aimed at ending the country's civil war. Syrian opposition groups are meeting in Istanbul to vote on whether to attend the U.N.-backed talks in Montreux on January 22.

"I believe as we begin to ... get into this process, that it will become clear there is no political solution whatsoever if Assad is not discussing a transition and if he thinks he is going to be part of that future. It is not going to happen," Kerry told a news conference after meeting his Canadian and Mexican counterparts.

"We are also not out of options with respect to what we may be able to do to increase the pressure and further change the calculus," he added.

Despite lobbying by Middle East allies like Saudi Arabia for the United States to take a more active role in the Syrian conflict, Washington has long insisted there is no military solution to the crisis.

Syria sank into civil war after a peaceful street uprising in March 2011 against four decades of Assad family rule. The revolt spiraled into an armed insurgency after the army responded with deadly force to suppress the unrest.

A Middle East security source told Reuters Russia, a co-sponsor with the United States of the Montreux talks, has stepped up supplies of military gear to Syria, including armored vehicles, drones and guided bombs.

Kerry on Thursday pressed Assad's opponents to attend the talks, known as the Geneva-2. The Syrian National Coalition, a fractious 120-member body, is meeting on Friday to decide whether to attend the conference although some of its members have already declared they will not participate because they see little chance of the talks succeeding.

Kerry has emphasized the meeting is a start to a process to forge a political transition and he rejected suggestions from Damascus this week that the talks focus on cooperation against "terrorism".

"They can bluster, they can protest, they can put out distortions, the bottom line is we are going to Geneva to implement Geneva 1, and if Assad doesn't do that it will invite greater response," Kerry said.

(Reporting by Lesley Wroughton; Editing by Stephen Powell)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see
Comments (23)
AlkalineState wrote:
Assad grasps for control of the rubble piles. “I will be supreme ruler of the dusty dog carcasses!!!”

Jan 17, 2014 11:31am EST  --  Report as abuse
tmc wrote:
The administration and powers that be in the USCA really blew this whole Syria thing. Because of a statement by President Obama, Mr. Kerry has to continue (publically) with the “Assad must go” stance. I highly doubt that’s the stance he takes behind closed doors. Assad will and probably should stay to attain peace. How long he stays in power is another matter.

Jan 17, 2014 12:22pm EST  --  Report as abuse
QuidProQuo wrote:
Wow who the hell is Kerry to decide the fate of Syria? USA arrogance showing its ugly head again. And I suppose Kerry has a new President all lined up to govern Syria in a moderate and just way? Seriously doubt it. There’s not one good thing that has come from the mouths or actions of the militant rebels. Not one! My feeling is that the USa doesn’t want a stable Syria or the people there to know peace. Assad may not be an angel but he’s doing his best to extoll a very different message to his people- one of moderation and dignity towards women. I don’t just read the USA b.s. news. There are a lot of Arabic papers in the world including SANA news that tells me a lot about who’s doing what and for whom. I think it’s appalling for the USA to keep going into all these middle eastern countries and supporting the overthrow of sitting governments. I know that we are strong allies with Israel and Israel and Syria are not the best of buddies, I get it. But I also cannot think that Israel’s people are the only one’s that deserve peace. Syria has some very good people too.

Jan 17, 2014 12:32pm EST  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.