Amid scandal, Governor Christie's New Jersey approval rating drops

NEW YORK Wed Jan 22, 2014 12:30pm EST

New Jersey Governor Chris Christie speak after his swearing in ceremony inside of the Patriots Theater at the War Memorial in Trenton, New Jersey January 21, 2014. REUTERS/Lucas Jackson

New Jersey Governor Chris Christie speak after his swearing in ceremony inside of the Patriots Theater at the War Memorial in Trenton, New Jersey January 21, 2014.

Credit: Reuters/Lucas Jackson

NEW YORK (Reuters) - Support for New Jersey Governor Chris Christie, which soared over his handling of Superstorm Sandy, has fallen almost 20 points since his landslide re-election in November as he faces probes into the conduct of his top aides.

The brash and charismatic Christie is widely seen as a top Republican contender for the White House in 2016, and the brewing scandals in his home state are the biggest political challenge he has faced yet.

Christie's approval rating among New Jersey voters, at 65 percent just before he was re-elected last year, dipped to 46 percent favorable to 43 percent unfavorable, according to the Rutgers-Eagleton Poll.

In the heavily Democratic state, support for Christie remains high among Republicans and independents, while support fell 26 points among Democrats.

The poll was conducted after Christie removed two top aides for their role in orchestrating huge traffic jams near the busy George Washington Bridge, apparently to settle a political score. The surveying was partly complete when new allegations were brought last week by the Democratic Mayor of Hoboken that Christie withheld storm recovery funds for political reasons.

Christie has said he had no direct knowledge of the bridge incident, and his office has strongly denied Hoboken Mayor Dawn Zimmer's allegations.

Voters' views on Christie's performance as governor, which hovered between 66 percent and 73 percent in the year after Sandy battered the state in late 2012, now stands at 53 percent, the poll found.

"The good will the governor built up among Democrats with his handling of the Sandy aftermath is gone, at least for now," said David Redlawsk, director of the Rutgers-Eagleton Poll and professor of political science at Rutgers University.

Christie's ratings were especially low among regular users of the George Washington Bridge, where the closings of two access lanes from Fort Lee caused hours-long snarls over four days in September.

Among those who use the bridge connecting northern New Jersey and Manhattan at least once a week, just 37 percent had a favorable view of the governor. Among New Jersey voters who never use the bridge, 51 percent had a favorable view.

The poll of 826 New Jersey adults was conducted from January 14 to January 19 and had a margin of error of plus or minus 3.4 percentage points. A sub-sample of 757 registered voters had a margin of error of plus or minus 3.6 percentage points.

(Reporting by Edith Honan; editing by Gunna Dickson)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (14)
Butch_from_PA wrote:
No Shiite Sherlock. If he had no knowledge then it shows complete lack of leadership.

Jan 22, 2014 1:30pm EST  --  Report as abuse
rdeed wrote:
Liberals have him on the run. It won’t belong before they accuse him of general mayhem and torture. To bad. He COULD have made a great President. He can kiss that dream goodbye as Chris M, Rachel M, and that ass. Sharton, will tear him up like rats on a dead rabbit.

Jan 22, 2014 1:52pm EST  --  Report as abuse
TheNewWorld wrote:
He should be recalled, and if found guilty put in jail. We tolerate too much abuse of powers from our elected officials and government workers.

Jan 22, 2014 3:04pm EST  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.