Syrian opposition looks to future without Assad

GENEVA Thu Jan 23, 2014 3:35pm EST

1 of 5. Syrian opposition leader Ahmed Jarba answers questions during a news conference in Geneva January 23, 2014.

Credit: Reuters/Jamal Saidi

Related Topics

GENEVA (Reuters) - Syria's opposition leader on Thursday laid out his demands for talks on ending the country's civil war, calling for the creation of a transitional government that does not include President Bashar al-Assad.

Ahmed Jarba told reporters in Geneva, where rival sides in the Syrian conflict are due to hold several days of negotiations under the auspices of the United Nations and major world powers, that he was looking to a future without Assad.

In a defiant speech, Jarba said the international community had now realized that Assad cannot stay in power.

"We have started to look into the future without him. Assad and all of his regime is in the past now. Nobody should have any doubt that the head of the regime is finished. This regime is dead," Jarba said.

Moscow, Assad's major backer, had given assurances that it was not "holding on" to Assad, Jarba said.

Assad's officials, who left talks with a U.N. envoy on Thursday without making any statement, have insisted that the Syrian president is not going anywhere, a view endorsed by U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry.

"Obviously he is not ready at this point in time," Kerry said in an interview with Al-Arabiya television.

The opposing views of Assad's future underlined the difficulties facing the Geneva talks, the first time the rival sides have met since the fighting began.

Jarba said the talks would be difficult, long and would look at all "core issues" as a package deal, including the creation of a transitional governing body.

"This is the basis of our negotiations and we will demand it," he said.

The first day of talks on Wednesday was dominated by fierce rhetoric from Assad's government and its foes, with each accusing the other of atrocities and showing no sign of compromise.

Few expect the peace talks to result in a breakthrough to end the war, but officials hope they can salvage the process by starting with more modest, practical measures to ease the plight of millions of people on the ground, especially in areas cut off from international aid.

ISLAMIST FIGHTERS

Islamist fighters who disdain the Western and Arab-backed opposition are not present at the talks, and nor is Iran, Assad's main regional backer.

More than 130,000 people are believed to have been killed, nearly a third of Syria's 22 million people have been driven from their homes and half are in need of international aid, including hundreds of thousands in areas cut off by fighting.

Wednesday's opening ceremony saw global powers vigorously defend their sides, with Western countries, Arab states and Turkey all joining the opposition in demanding a transitional government that would exclude Assad.

Russia, his main global supporter, said the focus of talks should be on fighting "terrorism", a word the Syrian government applies to all of its armed opponents.

The main negotiations, expected to last up to a week, are due to begin on Friday at the United Nations headquarters in Geneva. The two sides are not expected to meet face-to-face for now, leaving U.N. officials to act as go-betweens.

One of the opposition negotiators has spoken of a two-stage process, with practical steps like prisoner swaps, ceasefires, the withdrawal of heavy weapons and setting up aid corridors being dealt with first, before the political future.

The talks remain fragile, however, with both sides threatening to pull out. The government says it will not discuss removing Assad, while the opposition says it will not stay unless Assad's removal is the basis for talks.

Among the many difficulties with the process, the opposition delegation does not include the al Qaeda-linked Sunni Islamist militant groups who control much of the territory in rebel hands and have denounced those attending the talks as traitors.

Rebel ranks have been divided, with hundreds killed in recent weeks in battles between rival factions and the al Qaeda-linked Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant. Al Qaeda leader Ayman al-Zawahri called on fighters to unite.

(Reporting by Samia Nakhoul, Mariam Karouny, Dominic Evans, Khaled Oweis, Gabriela Baczynska and John Irish; writing by Peter Graff; editing by Giles Elgood and Ralph Boulton)

FILED UNDER:
We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (9)
boonteetan wrote:
Failure of Geneva 2 on Syrian peace must be a foregone conclusion. First, UN says, “Iran is not invited”. Second, Kerry says, “Assad must go”. Both are rigidly intangible.
Iran is a key player behind President Assad’s adamancy not to quit. Naturally, Syrian tough leader will never just quit like that. (ttm1943)

Jan 22, 2014 9:22pm EST  --  Report as abuse
AZreb wrote:
Just read one article that implied that the US will back the rebels. Really? We all know that many of the rebels are linked to al Qaida, so we will be backing a terrorist group in Syria. How bizarre can our government be?

Jan 23, 2014 8:19am EST  --  Report as abuse
kenradke11 wrote:
There will be little or no progress thanks to Russia and Iran’s involvement in this atrocious war. Assad can,t remain in power even while the conflict continues as he is the master puppet of terror on his own Country of Syria. Russia needs to embrace the Geneva 1 agreement of a transitional government (excluding Assad). There cannot be a truce of any kind until He is removed indefinitely!
Iran needs to remove their troops from Lebanon (Hezbollah)Damascus will become as a heap of ruin unfortunately as it states in God’s word.

Jan 23, 2014 11:05am EST  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.

Full focus