U.S. prosecutors subpoena documents in N.J. bridge scandal: lawyer

NEW YORK Thu Jan 23, 2014 5:53pm EST

1 of 2. New Jersey Governor Chris Christie prepares to make an education announcement involving a new after-school dinner program for students in need at Dudley Family School in Camden, New Jersey January 23, 2014.

Credit: Reuters/Mark Makela

Related Topics

NEW YORK (Reuters) - The U.S. Attorney's Office in New Jersey has issued subpoenas to Governor Chris Christie's campaign and the state Republican Party for documents related to George Washington Bridge access lane closures, a lawyer for both groups said on Thursday.

Federal prosecutors are looking into the incident in September in which a trail of emails has linked top Christie aides to huge traffic jams, apparently orchestrated to settle a political score during the governor's re-election campaign.

Christie, seen as a top Republican contender for the White House in 2016, has said he had no direct knowledge of the bridge incident, which is also under investigation by a state legislative committee.

In recent weeks, Democrats have made other allegations about the behavior of those close to Christie, a brash and charismatic executive who won re-election in a landslide after voters in this heavily Democratic state gave him high marks for his aggressive response to Superstorm Sandy in late 2012.

Hoboken Mayor Dawn Zimmer has come forward charging that Christie withheld storm recovery funds for political reasons. Congressman Frank Pallone requested a probe into a marketing campaign designed to draw visitors to the Jersey Shore after the storm that prominently featured Christie.

Christie's office has strongly denied any improper actions in either case.

Earlier this month, Christie fired his deputy chief of staff, Bridget Kelly, for her role in the so-called "Bridgegate" scandal. Two top Christie appointees to the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey, Bill Baroni and David Wildstein, have resigned their positions.

The lawyer for Christie's campaign and the Republican party of New Jersey, Mark Sheridan, said the subpoenas also included emails involving Kelly, Baroni and Wildstein.

Asked for comment on the subpoenas, Rebekah Carmichael, spokeswoman for the federal prosecutor, said: "Our office can neither confirm nor deny taking specific investigative actions."

(Reporting By Edith Honan; Editing by Scott Malone, Jonathan Oatis and David Gregorio)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (3)
flashrooster wrote:
Good. Let’s hope they can get to the bottom of this and the Hoboken scandal.

Jan 23, 2014 4:11pm EST  --  Report as abuse
sylvan wrote:
In what capacity was Christie ever an executive other than governor?
He was given his US Attorney position by Bush’s AG Roberto Gonzalez, and Karl Rove, after they fired all US attorneys that were Democrats, due to Christie fund raising for a war criminal. This was after Christie got caught lying about an indictment against his opponent in a local election, losing in a re-election bid. He also has a civil suit going to trial where he vacated indictments to help his political cronies. He is a mob boss. And then there is the Dawn Zimmer incident, more to come.
Not a good week, Chrisco.

Jan 23, 2014 5:32pm EST  --  Report as abuse
4825 wrote:
Let’s see, the US Attorney is appointed by the president. The US Attorney serves at the president’s pleasure and can be removed by the president at his pleasure. Makes one wonder if this subpoena for documents is being done as a payback? You know, sort of like closing a lane for payback to a Mayor. Does make one wonder when there is not any evidence that Christie was involved. Clearly just more Democrat manuvering to try to take the spotlight off of the failings of the Obama administration and take out a serious contender for 2016.

Jan 23, 2014 8:12pm EST  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.