Syrian opposition demands a future without Assad

GENEVA Fri Jan 24, 2014 5:20am EST

1 of 5. Syrian opposition leader Ahmed Jarba answers questions during a news conference in Geneva January 23, 2014.

Credit: Reuters/Jamal Saidi

GENEVA (Reuters) - Syria's opposition leader laid out his demands for talks on ending his country's civil war, calling for the creation of a transitional government that does not include President Bashar al-Assad.

Ahmed Jarba told reporters in Geneva, where rival sides in the Syrian conflict are on Friday due to begin several days of negotiations under the auspices of the United Nations and major world powers, that he was looking to a future without Assad.

In a defiant speech, Jarba said the international community now realized that Assad cannot stay in power.

"We have started to look into the future without him. Assad and all of his regime is in the past now. Nobody should have any doubt that the head of the regime is finished. This regime is dead," Jarba said.

Moscow, Assad's major backer, had given assurances that it was not "holding on" to Assad, Jarba said.

Assad's officials, who left talks with a U.N. envoy on Thursday evening without making any statement, have insisted that the Syrian president is not going anywhere.

U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry also said there was no sign Assad was ready to quit, although he insisted the Syrian leader had no place in his country's future.

"This is a man who has committed war crimes and still somehow wants to claim legitimacy to be able to govern the country," Kerry said in an interview with Al-Arabiya television.

But Kerry said there could be a place for officials from Assad's government in a transitional government as long as they "do not have blood on their hands".


The opposing views of Assad's future underlined the difficulties facing the talks, the first time the government and opposition sides have met since the fighting began.

Jarba said the negotiations would be long and difficult, and would look at all the "core issues" as a package deal, including the creation of a transitional governing body.

"This is the basis of our negotiations and we will demand it," he said.

A Western diplomat, setting expectations for Friday's talks very low, said the aim would be "to give some momentum to the process and avoid either side walking out".

Few expect the peace talks to result in a breakthrough to end the war, since Islamist fighters who disdain the Western and Arab-backed opposition are not present at the talks, and nor is Iran, Assad's main regional backer.

But officials hope they can salvage the process by starting with more modest, practical measures to ease the plight of millions of people on the ground, especially in areas cut off from international aid.

More than 130,000 people are believed to have been killed in the fighting, nearly a third of Syria's 22 million people have been driven from their homes, and half are in need of international aid, including hundreds of thousands in areas cut off by fighting.


The main negotiations, expected to last up to a week, are due to begin at 11 a.m. (1000 GMT) on Friday at the United Nations headquarters in Geneva.

U.N. envoy Lakhdar Brahimi will meet the two sides in the same room and explain how he plans to proceed. The heads of delegations will address Brahimi, but not each other.

The talks remain fragile, however, with both sides threatening to pull out. The government says it will not discuss removing Assad, while the opposition says it will not stay unless Assad's removal is the basis for talks.

Among the many difficulties with the process, the opposition delegation does not include the al Qaeda-linked Sunni Islamist militant groups who control much of the territory in rebel hands and have denounced those attending the talks as traitors.

Rebel ranks have been divided, with hundreds killed in recent weeks in battles between rival factions and the al Qaeda-linked Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant. Al Qaeda leader Ayman al-Zawahri called on fighters to unite.

(Reporting by Samia Nakhoul, Dominic Evans, Khaled Oweis and Gabriela Baczynska; Editing by Giles Elgood)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see
Comments (4)
cirrus7 wrote:
From the facts presented the story could just as easily be titled:

‘National Coalition’s Leader Ahmed Jarba and Secretary of State John Kerry agree: Assad must go.’

Mr. Kerry could lay out Assad’s cold murder of 1529 men women and children via Chemical Weapons, Mr. Jarba could condemn Assad’s bailout by Hezbollah terrorists, specializing in shooting small targets.
Mr. Kerry could rail at the report damning the Assad regime with massive evidence of torture starvation and murder of 11,000 detainees. Mr. Jarba could demand Russia stop supplying a War Criminal.

Jan 23, 2014 10:42pm EST  --  Report as abuse
Fromkin wrote:
No shame to this fake game

Jan 23, 2014 10:51pm EST  --  Report as abuse
JackHerer wrote:
@Fromkin – still defending a mass murderer of children on the basis of fantastical conspiracies and flawed logic I see.

Obvious question, but why would you actively help one of history’s monsters, if, at best, your argument for doing so has such a flimsy foundation?

Why is defending a cruel, foreign tyrant far more important to you than compassion for your fellow man?

Are you so unloved, that your whole life is totally detached from human suffering?

Jan 24, 2014 4:06am EST  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.

A tourist takes a plunge as she swims at Ngapali Beach, a popular tourist site, in the Thandwe township of the Rakhine state, October 6, 2013. Picture taken October 6, 2013. REUTERS/Soe Zeya Tun (MYANMAR - Tags: SOCIETY) - RTR3FOI0

Where do you want to go?

We look at when to take trips, budget considerations and the popularity of multigenerational family travel.   Video