Afghan president says U.S. should start talks with Taliban or leave

KABUL Sat Jan 25, 2014 8:01am EST

Afghan President Hamid Karzai speaks during a news conference in Kabul January 25, 2014. REUTERS/Mohammad Ismail

Afghan President Hamid Karzai speaks during a news conference in Kabul January 25, 2014.

Credit: Reuters/Mohammad Ismail

Related Topics

KABUL (Reuters) - President Hamid Karzai appeared to stiffen his resolve on Saturday not to sign a security pact with Washington, saying the United States should leave Afghanistan unless it could restart peace talks with the Taliban.

"In exchange for this agreement, we want peace for the people of Afghanistan. Otherwise, it's better for them to leave and our country will find its own way," Karzai told a news conference.

The president said pressing ahead with talks with the Taliban, in power from 1996-2001, was critical to ensure that Afghanistan was not left with a weak central government.

"Starting peace talks is a condition because we want to be confident that after the signing of the security agreement, Afghanistan will not be divided into fiefdoms," he said.

Most diplomats now agree that Karzai is unlikely to sign the Bilateral Security Agreement (BSA) that would allow for some form of U.S. military presence in Afghanistan after the end of 2014, when most troops are due to leave.

Along with reviving peace talks with the Taliban, Karzai is also demanding an end to all U.S. military operations on Afghan homes and villages, including strikes by pilotless trones.

The United States has threatened to pull all of its troops out unless a deal is signed in good time, but embassies are examining alternative solutions behind the scenes that would enable the NATO-led mission to remain.

Karzai's defiant tone struck a chord with those in the West who have already decided that further discussion with the Afghan president may be pointless and waiting for his successor to be elected is the best option.

"The more people speak about it being signed after the election, the more irrelevant he becomes," said one diplomat. "Sad as it is, we might have to bank on the next guy."

But representatives from some countries say this would not leave enough time for them to prepare for a post-2014 mission. Afghans are due to vote in a presidential election on April 5, but it could take weeks for Karzai's successor to assume power if a run-off round is required.

Karzai initially agreed to a text of the pact in November and an assembly of elders called on him to sign it. But he has since refused to sign.

In his comments to reporters, the Afghan president also denounced the use of advertising - some paid for by the United States - that lobbies for signature of the BSA.

"To harm the psyche and soul of the people of Afghanistan, there is serious propaganda going on," said Karzai, referring to the advertisements broadcast for weeks by local media but now taken off the air.

"No pressure, no threat, no psychological war can force us to sign the BSA. If they want to leave, they should leave today. We will continue our living."

(Reporting by Mirwais Harooni and Jessica Donati; Editing by Ron Popeski)

FILED UNDER:
We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (24)
AZreb wrote:
Why stay? What good will it do in the long run? Why more dead and wounded troops? Why more billions wasted in one of the most corrupt countries in the world?

Our US government has not given us any good reasons to stay in Afghanistan. Is that because there are no good reasons? Or is the administration determined to stay at the behest of the Pentagon and the MIC?

Remember the promise made by Obama in September, 2012, in Boulder, CO, speaking of our troops in Afghanistan: “We will have them ALL OUT OF THERE BY 2014″ (emphasis added). This is one promise Obama should keep, but will he?

Jan 25, 2014 8:19am EST  --  Report as abuse
captaindoc wrote:
the amount of money that politicians get must be really good to keep trying to stay in this war. USA politicians hear this “GET OUT OF ASTAN “. we need to stay out of wars or conflicts as the enemy may lose some real estate but we lose lives and lots of hard earned money to accomplish the establishment of corruption(to a higher degree), crime, and loss of life in someone else’s country that goes back to what it was before the intervention. the USA cannot change other society’s to our ways.

Jan 25, 2014 8:26am EST  --  Report as abuse
captaindoc wrote:
the amount of money that politicians get must be really good to keep trying to stay in this war. USA politicians hear this “GET OUT OF ASTAN “. we need to stay out of wars or conflicts as the enemy may lose some real estate but we lose lives and lots of hard earned money to accomplish the establishment of corruption(to a higher degree), crime, and loss of life in someone else’s country that goes back to what it was before the intervention. the USA cannot change other society’s to our ways.

Jan 25, 2014 8:26am EST  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.

Full focus