U.S. farm bill agreement could come within days: report

WASHINGTON Sun Jan 26, 2014 6:09pm EST

Related Topics

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - An agreement on the long-overdue U.S. farm bill could be completed as soon as Monday, followed by final approval likely within days, the Washington Post reported on Sunday.

Citing senior House of Representatives aides, the Post said that in the event of a deal on Monday, Republican leaders would bring it up for a House vote, with the measure seen passing with bipartisan support. The Democrat-controlled Senate would likely give its approval before a recess in mid-February, the newspaper said.

"We remain optimistic that we can reach agreement in time to be on the floor next week," House Agriculture Committee Chairman Frank Lucas was quoted as saying in a message to colleagues over the weekend.

The five-year farm bill, which covers issues from domestic crop subsidies to exports and global food aid, is being held up chiefly by a dispute between Republican House Speaker John Boehner and supporters of a program that would cut milk production if prices fall below a certain level.

Collin Peterson, the top Democrat on the House Agriculture Committee, has championed the Dairy Security Act, a new program that offers producers profit-margin insurance as long as they agree to cut milk output if prices fall below a set level.

Farmers generally support Peterson's proposal, while processors - who make cheese, ice cream and yogurt, and say it could lead to higher prices for milk - oppose it.

Boehner has been a long-standing opponent of dairy price supports. The speaker has derided the support system as "Soviet-style" and has vowed not to allow a bill with supply management to come to the House floor for a vote.

Lawmakers are more than a year late in replacing the 2008 farm law, which expired in the autumn of 2012 but was extended until September 30, 2013.

Negotiators have reportedly agreed to about $8 billion in cuts over 10 years to the food stamp program, formally known as the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, which gives about 47 million low-income Americans money to pay for food.

In its version of the farm bill passed in June, the Democratic-run Senate offered $4.5 billion in cuts to food stamps over 10 years. The House proposed $39 billion in cuts.

(Writing by Peter Cooney; Additional reporting by Eric Beech; Editing by Jonathan Oatis)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (2)
PowerOfChoice wrote:
Hopefully they are not going to again “grandfather” or “extend” the definition of RURAL. How large does anyone think many of the communities that have been defined as rural since 1980 have grown to in size? Some of those rural communities have tripled in size, yet still get to stick their fingers in the USDA rural money pie. How many legislators or their buddies own land in areas that should no longer be designated as rural? Is that why they keep grandfathering and expanding, so they can line their pockets or their back scratching donor’s pockets at the expense of the Tax Paying Citizens?

The current Farm Bill should be trashed!!! Everything should be separated out and if needed should stand alone in its own separate bill. In the future this will eliminate the petty bickering and force legislators elected to the Federal Level to consider best interest of Country instead of their added pork in legislation.

The failures in the Farm Bill are even being used by teachers:

Jan 27, 2014 2:30pm EST  --  Report as abuse
willich6 wrote:
This farm bill will be a compromise between both parties – like the recent budget; neither side especially likes it as the bill doesn’t cut SNAP subsidies as much as republicans want – but more than democrats feel they can live with; it replaces farm subsidies with crop insurance – a lower cost approach.
The sticking point now is the “Dairy Security Act” which would force dairy farmers to cut production of milk if prices fall below a certain threshold – not a good approach.. Let the market decide the price of milk; this will ultimately result in lower cost of production and lower food prices..

Jan 27, 2014 5:44pm EST  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.