Wireless mergers to invite scrutiny, says U.S. antitrust chief: NYT

Thu Jan 30, 2014 6:59pm EST

Signage for a T-Mobile store is pictured in downtown Los Angeles, California August 31, 2011. REUTERS/Fred Prouser

Signage for a T-Mobile store is pictured in downtown Los Angeles, California August 31, 2011.

Credit: Reuters/Fred Prouser

Signage for a T-Mobile store is pictured in downtown Los Angeles, California August 31, 2011. REUTERS/Fred Prouser

Signage for a T-Mobile store is pictured in downtown Los Angeles, California August 31, 2011.

Credit: Reuters/Fred Prouser

(Reuters) - It would be difficult for the U.S. Justice Department to approve a merger between any of the top four U.S. wireless phone companies, said William Baer, assistant attorney general for the antitrust division, the New York Times reported on Thursday.

Baer's comments came amid speculation that T-Mobile US Inc (TMUS.N) and Sprint Corp (S.N) might announce a deal in coming months.

He said any deal would face intense scrutiny because consumers had enjoyed "much more favorable competitive conditions" since the division blocked a proposed merger between AT&T Inc (T.N) and T-Mobile in 2011, the Times reported. (link.reuters.com/qec56v)

"It's going to be hard for someone to make a persuasive case that reducing four firms to three is actually going to improve competition for the benefit of American consumers," he told the newspaper, without referring to any specific deal.

Baer, who is speaking on Thursday evening at a meeting of the New York State Bar Association, was expected to tell antitrust lawyers there that he would prefer to see companies drop any inclination to play hardball with regulators and offer meaningful divestitures earlier, rather than later, in order to win quick approval for their deals.

"Often ... the strategy seems to be to eliminate a big rival while proposing a remedy that allows for a small rival or new entrant with limited resources to nip at the heels of the few remaining big players," Baer said in remarks issued before the speech.

"We will not waste our time with plainly inadequate settlement offers," said Baer.

Baer also noted in his speech, which discussed at length efforts to fight bid-rigging, that the Washington office of the Justice Department was adding prosecutors to fight cartels.

(Reporting by Shubhankar Chakravorty in Bangalore and Diane Bartz in Washington; Editing by Kirti Pandey and Peter Cooney)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (3)
njglea wrote:
Good Job, Mr. Baer! It’s about time some antitrust laws are enforced in America and around the world.

Jan 30, 2014 9:47am EST  --  Report as abuse
AlkalineState wrote:
Just nationalize the data signals. Screw the phone companies.

Jan 30, 2014 11:25am EST  --  Report as abuse
brotherkenny4 wrote:
What are you talking about. There are no antitrust laws in the US. If there were, americans would be rioting in the streets over congresses lack of oversight on the banking debacle. Too big to fail banks stole from the american people and you are telling me that congress could have done something about it ahead of time. That would be sick if that were true.

Jan 30, 2014 4:43pm EST  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.