Help wanted: Obama calls on CEOs to take on long-term jobless

WASHINGTON Fri Jan 31, 2014 12:57pm EST

U.S. President Barack Obama smiles before he addresses employees of General Electric's Waukesha Gas Engines facility in Waukesha, Wisconsin, January 30, 2014. REUTERS/Larry Downing

U.S. President Barack Obama smiles before he addresses employees of General Electric's Waukesha Gas Engines facility in Waukesha, Wisconsin, January 30, 2014.

Credit: Reuters/Larry Downing

Related Topics

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - President Barack Obama on Friday took steps to get businesses and the federal government to hire more of the long-term unemployed, part of his initiatives to get the jobless back to work.

"Just because you have been out of work for a while does not mean that you are not a hard worker," the president said at an event at the White House. "It just means you had bad luck or you were in the wrong industry or you lived in a region of the country that's catching up a little slower than others in the recovery."

The president met with the leaders of more than 20 big companies which have agreed not to discriminate against the long-term unemployed and signed a memo directing government agencies not to use long-term unemployment as a basis for denying someone a job.

"It's a cruel catch-22," the president said. "The longer you're unemployed, the more unemployable you may seem."

The companies whose leaders Obama met are among about 300 which have agreed to a one-page list of best practices for recruiting people who had been without a job for six months or more, a group which has struggled to find work despite an improving economy.

"It's saying that those who are long-term unemployed should get a fair shot," said Gene Sperling, Obama's top economic advisor.

The U.S. jobless rate has remained stubbornly high at 6.7 percent, but Sperling told reporters the rate would be closer to 5 percent were it not for the barriers to finding work for the long-term unemployed.

"We are trying to address what we feel is the heart of that negative cycle, which is the potential stigmatization of people merely for the sake that they are long-term unemployed," said Sperling, director of the National Economic Council.

The meeting follows a promise by Obama to take steps to improve the economy despite a reluctance by Republicans in Congress to agree with other parts of his plan.

Among those attending are the chief executives of eBay Inc, Boeing Corp, Bank of America Corp, McDonald's Corp, Marriott International and Walgreen Co, among others, the White House said in a statement on Friday ahead of the gathering.

Obama has tried, but so far failed, to convince Congress to extend jobless benefits for people who have been seeking work for more than six months.

Benefits for 1.6 million Americans have expired since the end of 2013, numbers that could swell to 4.9 million people by the end of 2014 unless legislation is passed.

DEMORALIZING

Research by the University of Toronto, McGill University and the University of Chicago which indicated a bias against long-term unemployed helped convince the White House to act.

The researchers used 12,000 fictitious resumes to respond to real job openings in 100 cities. Some of the invented candidates had been "unemployed" for only a short period, while others had been out of work for months - but their work experience, education and demographics were identical.

Applicants who had been out of work for eight months had 45 percent fewer callbacks from employers: "fairly decisive evidence that merely the status of being long-term unemployed serves as a disadvantage," Sperling said.

A second study from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology found that someone unemployed for one month will get one interview on average for every 10 job applications, while someone out of work for seven months has to send 35 resumes to get just one interview.

"It's very demoralizing to send out hundreds of resumes and not get an interview," Sperling said.

Sperling began talking to business leaders in May about the issues and he and Obama adviser Valerie Jarrett began approaching businesses directly in late 2013 about committing to review screening of resumes and other hiring practices that shut out the long-term unemployed.

Other companies who have signed on included Apple Inc, Wal-Mart Stores Inc, Ford Motor Co, General Motors Co, Proctor & Gamble Co, JPMorgan Chase & Co and AT&T.

Media mogul Rupert Murdoch signed up his companies, News Corp and Twenty-First Century Fox Inc, after Sperling pitched him the concept.

"He responded directly by email to say he thought this was a strong idea," Sperling said.

Obama on Friday will issue a presidential memorandum to ensure the federal government adopts the same best practices in its recruitment

He also will announce $150 million in grants for public-private programs that help match the long-term unemployed with local employers. LinkedIn, a social networking website focused on jobs, has signed on to help programs identify potential candidates, the White House said.

The White House said it did not have a projection of how many unemployed might land an interview because of the changes.

"I can't give you an exact number," Sperling said. "But these are companies that employ millions and millions and millions of people, and are going to be hiring more people, and I think this is going to have a significant impact."

(Editing by Lisa Shumaker and Stephen Powell)

FILED UNDER:
We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (20)
actnow wrote:
The President and his party have the biggest opportunity to decrease unemployment by resending S744…..the Senate’s mass immigration bill that would increase legal employment by about 30 million people per year. Yes….many American citizens at the lower end of the economic scale would take many of these jobs ( I was one of the thirty years ago). Unemployment among younger African Americans, and many college age citizens is pandemic. It is pure hypocrisy for this President and his party to push mass amnesty and immigration while calling for increased employment. Citizen of both parties must get loud NOW on this issue or both parties will sell them out for their own interests. NumbersUSA dot com is a great site to understand this issue better and get involved. The time to act is now, since the Republicans are starting to look like they will begin to cave on this issue too. They must hear the million of American voices to remind them who they serve. Even if you aren’t in the lower end of the economic scale, please show compassion on your fellow citizens that are….unemployment hurts families. Don’t get mad….take action; it’s easy and powerful.

Jan 31, 2014 7:55am EST  --  Report as abuse
HarryO12345 wrote:
BS and I mean BS… these are the CEO’s of the same companies that are sobbing and crying for ILLEGAL ALIEN amnesty. So if you’re a long term unemployed and don’t mind pushing a broom for 2 bucks an hour you’re all set. Barry is such a lying hypocrite, such a lying hypocrite.

Jan 31, 2014 8:47am EST  --  Report as abuse
HarryO12345 wrote:
“BS and I mean BS… these are the CEO’s of the same companies that are sobbing and crying for ILLEGAL ALIEN amnesty. So if you’re a long term unemployed and don’t mind pushing a broom for 2 bucks an hour you’re all set. Barry is such a lying hypocrite, such a lying hypocrite.”

You do realize that minimum wage, nationally, is $7.25/hour, and even higher in some states, don’t you? So I don’t know what you’re talking about when you say “pushing a broom for 2 bucks an hour”… Mexico maybe?

And care to explain how “Barry” is a lying hypocrite for encouraging companies to give long-term unemployed workers a fair chance? You sound very upset; are you just venting about immigration?

Jan 31, 2014 9:37am EST  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.