NJ Gov Christie, dogged by bridge closure, booed at Super Bowl event

NEW YORK Sat Feb 1, 2014 6:53pm EST

1 of 4. New Jersey Governor Chris Christie (L) departs City Hall in Fort Lee, New Jersey in this file photo taken January 9, 2014.

Credit: Reuters/Lucas Jackson/Files

Related Topics

NEW YORK (Reuters) - New Jersey Governor Chris Christie was greeted with audible boos and a few loud cheers during a Super Bowl-related appearance in New York City on Saturday, a day after a former appointee said the popular Republican knew about politically motivated lane closures near a busy commuter bridge.

The incident cast a cloud over Christie at what could have been a moment of triumph for man considered a leading candidate for his party's nomination to run for president in 2016. The Super Bowl will be played on Sunday in East Rutherford, New Jersey.

At a ceremony marking the hand off of Super Bowl hosting duties, Christie appeared Saturday in New York's Times Square with NFL officials and political leaders from New York and Arizona, which will host next year's game.

Christie's introduction was met with a chorus of audible boos and chants of support from the thousands of people gathered in the area for a Super Bowl street fair.

He did not mention the scandal during brief 30 second remarks in which he thanked the NFL and his New York counterpart and Super Bowl co-host, Governor Andrew Cuomo.

The negative public sentiment was unusual for Christie, the chairman of the Republican Governors Association who coasted to re-election as governor in November with 60 percent of the vote.

But in the weeks since starting his second term, Christie has been dogged by scandal since it emerged last month that some of his aides and appointees orchestrated traffic jams around the George Washington Bridge in Fort Lee, New Jersey. State and federal investigations have been launched into the lane closures in September, which came after the town's Democratic mayor declined to endorse the governor's re-election bid.

Christie has adamantly denied any knowledge of the lane closures and cut ties with two of his top advisers for their apparent role in the scheme.

David Wildstein, a long-time Christie acquaintance and one of his appointees at the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey, which managed the bridge, resigned from his post after it emerged he oversaw the closures.

On Friday, an attorney for Wildstein said "evidence exists" Christie knew of the closures when they were happening. The letter did not indicate Christie involved himself in the closures in any way, did not specify exactly when he became aware of the jams and offered no evidence to back up the claim.

Christie's office denied the claims and issued an email saying: "David Wildstein will do and say anything to save David Wildstein." The email to Christie's friends and supporters was posted on the website Politico.com and confirmed by Colin Reed, a spokesman for the governor.

The governor's popularity has also been tarnished by his use of Superstorm Sandy relief money for a tourism ad campaign. The mayor of Hoboken, New Jersey, has alleged that her hesitance to back a real estate deal prompted Christie's office to delay Sandy relief money.

"ON THE BRINK OF RUIN"

On Saturday, local newspapers said the governor's political career could be doomed if it was proven he knew in advance of the four days of lane closures that caused massive delays for commuters, ambulances and school buses.

The New York Daily News said in an editorial that Christie now "stands on the brink of ruin" if he cannot defend himself against the latest claims.

"In that event, Christie's governorship is over and he should prepare to face a federal criminal probe as a private citizen. Resignation would be a must. Otherwise, impeachment would be a snap," it said.

Charles Stile, a columnist for the Bergen Record, a major New Jersey newspaper, wrote on Saturday that if Wildstein produces evidence that "turns out to be the damning, incontrovertible kind, then Christie's career will be in tatters, if not over."

The allegations made through his attorney by Wildstein, who has been subpoenaed in connection with lane closure probe, said the resigned Port Authority official could "prove the inaccuracy" of some of Christie's denials.

The letter describes the order to close the lanes as coming from "the Christie administration," but does not say that Christie himself orchestrated the closures in any way.

On Friday, the Christie administration said Wildstein had said nothing to contradict Christie's position that the governor had "no prior knowledge" of the closures.

A bipartisan committee of state lawmakers is investigating the episode, as is the office of Paul Fishman, the U.S. Attorney for New Jersey.

Hours after Wildstein's letter was released, Christie appeared in Manhattan to attend a birthday party for the broadcaster Howard Stern, but avoided the reporters assembled outside.

(Editing by Alex Dobuzinskis and David Gregorio)

FILED UNDER:
We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (24)
flashrooster wrote:
4825: Yes, traffic jams happen all the time. The difference with this traffic jam in question–as if you didn’t already know–is that it was intentionally orchestrated in an act of political payback. That’s illegal. You don’t just “get over it.” There are laws that need to be carried out. If evidence suggests that Christie was involved in a criminal act, and it’s looking that way, then Christie must be prosecuted. This has nothing to do with Obama or Hillary. Christie has to answer for Christie.

Don’t worry. You still have Ted Cruz.

Jan 31, 2014 10:34pm EST  --  Report as abuse
purcelc wrote:
Amid all this mutual finger-pointing, one thing seem clear. Nobody in a position of authority seems to have asked the obvious question on day one: “Why would a decision-maker in his/her right mind shut down two-thirds of one of the busiest bridges of the country just for a traffic study?”

Feb 01, 2014 1:11am EST  --  Report as abuse
johhnnyt wrote:
Seems like a bogus story
“The letter does not indicate that Christie orchestrated the closures in any way, does not specify exactly when he became aware of the jams, and offers no evidence to back up the claim” So what does the letter say?

Feb 01, 2014 1:14am EST  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.