ECB to reveal strategy for bank health checks by end-March

FRANKFURT Mon Feb 3, 2014 1:07pm EST

A pigeon flies next to the construction site of the new European Central Bank (ECB) headquarters in Frankfurt, December 3, 2013. REUTERS/Kai Pfaffenbach

A pigeon flies next to the construction site of the new European Central Bank (ECB) headquarters in Frankfurt, December 3, 2013.

Credit: Reuters/Kai Pfaffenbach

FRANKFURT (Reuters) - The European Central Bank kept the euro zone's top lenders on tenterhooks as it promised to reveal the strategy for its unprecedented review of bank balance sheets by the end of March, giving only scant detail on Monday.

The ECB's asset quality review, or AQR, is part of a broader examination that also includes a stress test to see how banks hold up under shock scenarios, to avoid nasty surprises once it starts supervising them from November.

The exercise aims to encourage banks to recognize losses on loans or investments that have soured over time, allowing them to regain investors' trust and free up capacity to grant new loans to help along the euro zone's fragile economic recovery.

By holding back details of the AQR, the ECB will keep banks on their toes.

"Firms' auditors don't send around the audit manuals to clients," said Stephen Smith, head of KPMG's AQR Task Force. "There's a danger that people might start to game you (if they know the details too far in advance)."

Confidence in the sector remains fragile despite more than 1 trillion euros ($1.4 trillion) of state support since the global financial crisis and the euro zone's debt problems underlined the risky relationship between over-indebted governments and the banks who buy many of their sovereign bonds.

The European Union's latest health checks are intended to settle any lingering doubts over its finances.

On Friday, the European Banking Authority (EBA) set out parameters for the stress tests and the ECB said it would apply them as well, aiming to give banks the stress test scenarios by the end of April.

Euro zone banks will get some time to meet the capital shortfalls highlighted by the scenarios, but the gaps from the baseline scenario in which banks must have a core capital ratio above 8 percent need to be addressed right away.

"A shortfall relative to the baseline scenario will require that capital be raised in the nearer term, whereas a shortfall arising from the adverse scenario may only require capital to be raised over a more extended period, on the basis of an agreed capital plan," the ECB said in a statement.

KPMG's Smith said a marked difference to previous rounds of stress tests was the ECB's clear intent to carefully examine banks' trading assets as well as their loan assets. "It confirms that the AQR will be looking at the darkest recesses of bank balance sheets," he added.


On the key question of valuing government bonds, the ECB said sovereign debt held in the available-for-sale and held-for-trading portfolios would be marked-to-market.

The ECB also said capital instruments that can automatically be converted into common equity tier 1 capital (CET1) "may be eligible for use to address a capital shortfall arising from the adverse stress test scenario, as long as the conversion trigger is set at 5.5 percent or above."

This could help the sector.

"We believe that this provision will significantly reduce the need for upfront recapitalizations across Europe, and consequently should be positive for both bank equity and subordinated debt in 2014," said Ciaran Callaghan, banks analysts with Dublin-based Merrion Capital.

The AQR and the stress tests will feed into each other and their timings will overlap somewhat, but the overall result -spelling out the size of any capital shortfall - will be published only in October.

Analysts have estimated the tests will show the banks need up to 100 billion euros ($135 billion) of fresh capital.

Over the past couple of months, the ECB has collected vast streams of data from the 128 banks that are taking part in the exercise and some lenders have to deliver extensive detail on their trading books and risk models by February 7.

National supervisors have also identified particularly risky portfolios they would like included in the in-depth review, which the ECB will review and approve by mid-February.

The actual review of assets, collateral and provisioning in the selected portfolios will start in March.

(Additional reporting by Laura Noonan in London, writing by Paul Carrel; Editing by Catherine Evans/Ruth Pitchford)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see
Comments (2)
toonik_ph wrote:
Just heard about this.. great..

Feb 02, 2014 11:27pm EST  --  Report as abuse
GreekAnalyst wrote:
This is like a battle between two parties, one having empty hands and the other a super – rocket – thrower machine gun! What can ECB do to battle governance issues with European Central Banks? The ECB cannot even do anything against national central banks that fail to enforce appropriate framework to local Banks.

Take for instance Greece, who is a good example of banks that face severe issues for a fact.

In 2012 the Bank of Greece fined 4 major (“systemic”) Greek banks of some petty (traffic alike tickets) fines for failing to comply with IFRS. The non compliance was not revelead to the common stockholders or the Greek Public (the state) who currently owns 90% of these banks.

In another example, If I am not mistaken, the Central Bank of Greece keeps “private” (even after parliament requests) a report by Blackrock in Greek Banks Bad Loans who Greek civilians are to pay via tax money. Apart from ethics, the report has been seen by numerous people, is material and could be considered as a non – dissemination of information that could affect stock markets and nevertheless the Bank of Greece would not give it to common stock holders and Greek taxpayers.

Finally, after hearings in Greek parliament regarding the Post Hellenic Bank scandal, the Governor of Central Banks revealed findings that were given to public and stockholders regarding audits from bank of Greece (that also had petty fines).

What can ECB actually do? Nothing at all. Can she enfore any decisions on national “private” banks? I would not thing so. Any issues encountered would also never see the light of day. Banking in worldwide faces tremendous Corporate Governance Issues that cannot be battled with tiny measures.

Feb 03, 2014 3:50pm EST  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.