Iran foreign minister: nuclear deal possible in six months

BERLIN Mon Feb 3, 2014 2:29pm EST

Iran's Foreign Minister Mohammad Javad Zarif attends the annual Munich Security Conference February 2, 2014. REUTERS/Lukas Barth

Iran's Foreign Minister Mohammad Javad Zarif attends the annual Munich Security Conference February 2, 2014.

Credit: Reuters/Lukas Barth

Related Topics

BERLIN (Reuters) - Iranian Foreign Minister Javad Mohammad Zarif said on Monday a final deal with world powers on Tehran's nuclear program is possible within six months if there is good will and he was not worried about the U.S. Congress trying to impose new sanctions.

U.S. President Barack Obama used his State of the Union address last week to veto any legislation that threatens the talks with Iran. U.S. senators including some of Obama's Democrats have co-sponsored a bill that would impose new restrictions on Iran if talks on a permanent accord falter.

But Iran has warned that it will walk away from negotiations - raising the risk of conflict in the Middle East - if the bill becomes law. It is now stalled in the Senate.

"With good will we can reach an agreement within six month," he said in a speech to the German Council on Foreign Relations. "I don't fear a decision in the U.S. Congress ... The U.S. president has promised to veto it."

Zarif was visiting Berlin after meeting U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry and other members of the six powers negotiating with Iran at the annual Munich Security Conference at the weekend.

Iran reached a landmark preliminary agreement with them in November to halt its most sensitive nuclear operations, winning some relief from sanctions in return. Talks with the six powers about a definitive settlement begin in Vienna on February 18.

The meetings with Kerry and others from the six powers in Munich evoked the easing of antagonism between the Islamic Republic and the West, with Zarif describing the talks in Vienna as an historic opportunity Iran would not squander.

Iran insists its nuclear program is entirely peaceful but Western countries have long suspected Tehran of covertly researching the means to develop a nuclear weapon.

The prospect of a deal has lessened the risk of Israel or the United States taking military action against Iranian nuclear facilities to prevent Tehran acquiring a nuclear bomb.

"We will not start a military operation against anyone - I say: against anyone," Zarif said in Berlin on Monday.

Kerry and Zarif have met several times since the election of Iranian President Hassan Rouhani, a relative moderate, last June paved the way for the thaw in relations with the West.

Zarif told Reuters in an interview on Saturday, however, that Iran was not prepared, as part of a long-term deal on the scope of its nuclear activity, to give up research on advanced centrifuges that could greatly speed up its enrichment of uranium.

(Writing by Stephen Brown; Editing by Mark Heinrich)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see
Comments (7)
Tiu wrote:
Not a good idea aiming to end in August.

Feb 03, 2014 8:29am EST  --  Report as abuse
AHLambauer wrote:
Reading the report by the Director General of the IAEA “Implementation of the NPT safeguards agreement in the Islamic Republic of Iran” from 6 June 2003 (GOV/2003/40), which was the first and the one which set the Iran case in motion, it becomes clear that Iran never ever did anything in breach of NPT, and that IAEA, at least its DG, knew that.

The report mentioned above reads like a thriller and shows that Iran on the one side exhausted every possibility NPT offers, but even never went beyond it.

Iran case is a real story, written intentionally by bullying powers on the one and by truth and justice seekers on the other hand. It was initiated for demonstration purposes by the latter and for hegemonic intervention into Irans internal affaires by the former.

The only way the US may be able to escape from that without losing face is to make public that in the IAEA’s structure there have forcefully lodged some subversive creatures.

Feb 03, 2014 9:14am EST  --  Report as abuse
pbgd wrote:
The sanctions have already been reduced. That is all Iran needed. Why should they now bother to make a deal?

Feb 03, 2014 10:06am EST  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.