Disappearance of wildflowers may have doomed Ice Age giants

WASHINGTON Wed Feb 5, 2014 6:20pm EST

A Mammoth tusk extracted from ice complex deposits along the Logata River in Taimyr, Russia, is shown in this undated handout photo provided by Professor Per Moller February 5, 2014. REUTERS/Per Moller/Johanna Anjar/Handout via Reuters

A Mammoth tusk extracted from ice complex deposits along the Logata River in Taimyr, Russia, is shown in this undated handout photo provided by Professor Per Moller February 5, 2014.

Credit: Reuters/Per Moller/Johanna Anjar/Handout via Reuters

Related Topics

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Flower power may have meant the difference between life and death for some of the extinct giants of the Ice Age, including the mighty woolly mammoth and woolly rhinoceros.

Scientists who studied DNA preserved in Arctic permafrost sediments and in the remains of such ancient animals have concluded that these Ice Age beasts relied heavily on the protein-rich wildflowers that once blanketed the region.

But dramatic Ice Age climate change caused a huge decline in these plants, leaving the Arctic covered instead in grasses and shrubs that lacked the same nutritional value and could not sustain the big herbivorous mammals, the scientists reported in the journal Nature on Wednesday.

The change in vegetation began roughly 25,000 years ago and ended about 10,000 years ago - a time when many of the big animals slipped into extinction, the researchers said.

Scientists for years have been trying to figure out what caused this mass extinction, when two-thirds of all the large-bodied mammals in the Northern Hemisphere died out.

"Now we have, from my perspective at least, a very credible explanation," Eske Willerslev of the University of Copenhagen, an expert in ancient DNA who led an international team of researchers, said in a telephone interview.

The findings contradicted the notion that humans arriving in these regions during the Ice Age caused the mass extinction by hunting the big animals into oblivion - the so-called overkill or Blitzkrieg hypothesis.

"We think that the major driver (of the mass extinction) is not the humans," Willerslev said, although he did not rule out that human hunters may have delivered the coup de grace to some species already diminished by the dwindling food supplies.

The Arctic region once teemed with herds of big animals, in some ways resembling an African savanna. Large plant eaters included woolly mammoths, woolly rhinos, horses, bison, reindeer and camels, with predators including hyenas, saber-toothed cats, lions and huge short-faced bears.

The scientists carried out a 50,000-year history of the vegetation across the Arctic in Siberia and North America.

They obtained 242 permafrost sediment samples from various Arctic sites and studied the feces and stomach contents from the mummified remains of Ice Age animals recovered in places like Siberia. They determined the age of the samples and analyzed the

DNA.

While many scientists had thought the ecosystem had been grasslands and the big animals were grass eaters, this study showed it instead was dominated by a kind of plant known as forbs - essentially wildflowers.

"The whole Arctic ecosystem looked extremely different from today. You can imagine these enormous steppes with no trees, no shrubs, but dominated by these small flowering plants," Willerslev said.

Christian Brochmann, a botanist at the Natural History Museum at the University of Oslo, said the permafrost contained "a vast, frozen DNA archive left as footprints from past ecosystems," that could be deciphered by exploring animal and plant collections already stored in museums.

(Reporting by Will Dunham, editing by G Crosse)

FILED UNDER:
We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (4)
morbas wrote:
Flora is used both as a climate indicator as well as a species agrarian enabler. The Maastrichtian Stage, last stage of Cretaceous, is demarcated by a global cooling impulse. Controversial decline of the Dinosaur species hinges on that 70.5Ma-ago transition. Nova uncovered the climate bounds by the flora leaf structure at 70.5Ma-ago. And, fossilized bone structure indicates warm blooded growth rates for the ‘Arctic Dinosaurs’. So was the Yucatan meteorite to late to terminate the species, perhaps end a species on the brink of extinction? This similarity with the plight of warm blood mastodon may shed some light, such as the Clovis point extermination controversy has equivalent ‘intellectual controversy’.

Feb 06, 2014 7:51am EST  --  Report as abuse
AlkalineState wrote:
If only large ruminants had a way to live on a grass diet. Wait….. this paper makes no sense :)

Feb 06, 2014 12:58pm EST  --  Report as abuse
AlkalineState wrote:
The other thing that does not make sense here: Why did mammoths also go extinct in the lower latitudes (where wildflowers remained plentiful)? Recall that most mammoth fossils are not found in the arctic (where this limited study was done), but in the lower latitudes.

An arctic extinction of wildflowers would have little bearing on the global population of mammoths at the time, it would seem. Why would a mammoth in New Mexico care what was happening to the flowers in upper Siberia. No?

Feb 06, 2014 6:29pm EST  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.

Photo

California's historic drought

With reservoirs at record lows, California is in the midst of the worst drought in decades.  Slideshow