Georgia road officials apologize for overreacting to snow risk

ATLANTA Thu Feb 6, 2014 1:34pm EST

Cars are parked on Interstate 285 after being stranded overnight in Atlanta, Georgia January 29, 2014. REUTERS/Chris Aluka Berry

Cars are parked on Interstate 285 after being stranded overnight in Atlanta, Georgia January 29, 2014.

Credit: Reuters/Chris Aluka Berry

ATLANTA (Reuters) - Georgia state transportation officials, reeling from the snow and ice that paralyzed Atlanta highways last week, said they "overreacted" on Thursday by warning motorists of a winter storm watch that had not in fact been issued.

After weather forecasts mentioned a chance of more snow, officials posted winter storm watch and warning messages on electronic roadway signs in Atlanta late on Wednesday and early Thursday.

But the National Weather Service had predicted only light snow, possibly mixing with rain. "The term 'winter storm' was never used," weather service meteorologist Kent Frantz said.

The Georgia Department of Transportation subsequently removed the more dire warnings and apologized for the error.

"In our desire to proactively inform the traveling public of potential hazardous road conditions, we overreacted to a weather statement from the National Weather Service," transportation officials said in a statement. "We apologize for any confusion this may have caused."

Atlanta highways came to a complete standstill last week after about two inches of snow fell around the city. Hundreds of thousands of commuters hit the roads at the same time to get home from work and pick up their children from school.

Governor Nathan Deal, a Republican up for re-election this year, admitted the state responded too slowly to the storm. He announced a new severe weather warning notification system on Monday and named a state task force that will explore ways to improve the government response to storms.

(Editing by Colleen Jenkins and Gunna Dickson)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (2)
FriscoJohn wrote:
Once bitten, twice shy?

Feb 07, 2014 3:44pm EST  --  Report as abuse
JamVee wrote:
Kinda makes you wonder how all those folks, pre-TV, pre-Radio, and pre-weatherpeople manage to survive the thousands of snow and ice storms, from pre-history, right up to about the 1950′s. BUT, they did it, and, in fact, they seemed to thrive.

Nowadays, they close the schools and government offices if the sky is too cloudy . . . Then they have to have someone to blame, so they point fingers at anyone still standing, as if their day was spoiled by Mother Nature. STOSSEL is right, GIVE ME A BREAK!

Feb 07, 2014 3:51pm EST  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.

Photo

California's historic drought

With reservoirs at record lows, California is in the midst of the worst drought in decades.  Slideshow