Utility stops leak of coal ash into North Carolina river

Sat Feb 8, 2014 9:39pm EST

Feb 8 (Reuters) - Workers on Saturday plugged a broken pipe that leaked up to 82,000 tons of power plant coal ash into a North Carolina river, Duke Energy Corp said.

Crews filled part of the stormwater pipe with concrete and capped it, and the rest of the pipe will be filled with concrete as well, said Duke, the biggest U.S. electric power provider.

"Plugging the pipe was clearly job one, but we're continuing our efforts and working closely with all the agencies involved in this response," Charlie Gates, senior vice president for power generation operations, said in the statement.

Duke's next step is to keep monitoring water quality, he said.

The ash release was discovered on Sunday at the power plant in Eden, North Carolina, which was retired in 2012. The company said the pipe under a 27-acre (11-hectare) ash pond released enough coal ash to fill between 20 and 32 Olympic-size swimming pools.

An estimated 24 million to 27 million gallons (91 million to 102 million liters) of ash basin water also reached the river, Duke said.

Before the pipe was sealed, Duke installed a catch basin and pumps at its end to reduce outflow to the river. Samples by Duke and the state Department of Environment and Natural Resources show that water quality is improving, the company said.

Waterkeeper Alliance, a water advocacy group, said this week that analysis of Dan River samples showed "extremely high levels" of arsenic, chromium, iron, lead and other toxic metals typically found in coal ash.

A Duke Energy spokesman has said tests by the utility and North Carolina officials indicated no adverse impact on the water supply.

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (2)
TreyTreyTrey wrote:
SPIN CLASSIC !

So, just to quote again,

“Waterkeeper Alliance, a water advocacy group, said this week that analysis of Dan River samples showed “extremely high levels” of arsenic, chromium, iron, lead and other toxic metals typically found in coal ash.

A Duke Energy spokesman has said tests by the utility and North Carolina officials indicated no adverse impact on the water supply.”

SPIN CLASSIC !!

A HUGE segment of water-drinking North Carolinians drink from wells. And any well that is tapping the Dan River water basin and aquifer where these “Extremely HIGH LEVELS” of toxic metals have been detected and verified will have these metals showing up in their systems.

I wonder what the threshold is for “adverse impact” on our water supply is being used…? “If the color of the water is green…it is adverse…other than that, good to go…”

I am kidding but it begs the question just what “adverse impacts” actually means. Well water drinkers should know, at minimum !

Feb 10, 2014 11:39am EST  --  Report as abuse
TreyTreyTrey wrote:
S

Feb 10, 2014 11:39am EST  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.