Lawmakers call NFL on Redskins name: it's an insult, not honor

WASHINGTON Mon Feb 10, 2014 1:25pm EST

A man stands at a window lit by the NFL logo as he watches performances during the 2012 NFL kickoff show in New York September 5, 2012. REUTERS/Lucas Jackson

A man stands at a window lit by the NFL logo as he watches performances during the 2012 NFL kickoff show in New York September 5, 2012.

Credit: Reuters/Lucas Jackson

Related Topics

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Two U.S. lawmakers on Monday rejected the National Football League's claim that the Washington Redskins name was an honor to Native Americans and urged the sports league to recognize it as a racial slur and back changing the name.

In a letter to the National Football League, U.S. Senator Maria Cantwell, a Democrat from Washington state, and Republican U.S. Representative Tom Cole of Oklahoma criticized the league for defending the name.

"The terminology used by the Washington football team has been determined to be a slur," the lawmakers said.

"It is, in fact, an insult to Native Americans. We are calling on you and the National Football League to take a formal position in support of a name change," they wrote in the letter, first reported by The New York Times.

A representative for the Redskins, in an email to Reuters, dismissed the lawmakers' request. The NFL had no immediate reaction.

The letter follows recent comments by NFL Commissioner Roger Goodell in support of the Redskins' moniker, which team owner Dan Snyder has vowed not to change.

"Let me remind you this is the name of a football team, a football team that has had that name for 80 years and has presented the name in a way that has honored Native Americans," Goodell said at a January 31 news conference. He said the league respected those who disagreed but cited polling figures showing support for the Redskins name.

On Monday, the lawmakers shot back.

"For you to pretend that the name is defensible based on decade-old public opinion polling flies in the face of our constitutionally protected government-to-government relationship with tribes," wrote Cantwell, who heads the Senate Committee on Indian Affairs, and Cole, a member of the Chickasaw Nation and one of two Native American congressmen, according to his office.

Both Oklahoma and Washington state are home to dozens of federally recognized Native American tribes.

Redskins spokesman Tony Wyllie, in an email to Reuters, chided the lawmakers for focusing on the team's name given other pressing national issues.

"With all the important issues Congress has to deal with such as a war in Afghanistan to deficits to health care, don't they have more important issues to worry about than a football team's name? And given the fact that the name of Oklahoma means 'Red People' in Choctaw, this request is a little ironic," said Wyllie.

NFL spokesman Greg Aiello told Reuters that the league received the letter and would later respond "in an appropriate manner."

(Additional reporting by Steve Ginsburg; Editing by Doina Chiacu, Dan Grebler and Bernard Orr)

FILED UNDER:
We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (20)
The decision whether using a Native American logo,likeness, name etc. should be left entirely to the Indian Council in the area. It’s their name, their likeness, etc., and only they can know if it’s an honor or not. And, what right does the NFL have to just usurp a tribe’s logo or likeness?

Feb 10, 2014 12:23pm EST  --  Report as abuse
desertares wrote:
Of course the name is an insult. Everyone knows it is. Only the people who make money
on it such as the team, vendors, etc want it to stay the name.

Feb 10, 2014 12:34pm EST  --  Report as abuse
SoutherRican wrote:
Next these idiots will try to get the Browns name changed or horse lovers will object to the Broncos name. When will Norway start objecting to the Vikings? Will the Pope get mad a New Orleans, etc.

Feb 10, 2014 12:37pm EST  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.