South Sudan rebels say they will boycott latest peace talks

ADDIS ABABA Mon Feb 10, 2014 2:04pm EST

Rebel fighters gather in a village in Upper Nile State February 8, 2014. REUTERS/Goran Tomasevic

Rebel fighters gather in a village in Upper Nile State February 8, 2014.

Credit: Reuters/Goran Tomasevic

ADDIS ABABA (Reuters) - South Sudanese rebels threatened on Monday to boycott the next round of peace talks in Ethiopia unless the government freed political prisoners and sent home the Ugandan troops who have been supporting it.

But the regional IGAD bloc mediating the talks, due to resume on Tuesday, said rebel leader Riek Machar had agreed to have his delegation take part in the talks.

The Addis Ababa talks, which secured a ceasefire last month, aim to end a conflict that has claimed the lives of thousands of people and displaced more than half a million South Sudanese since it broke out on December 15.

The rebels said they wanted four remaining political prisoners held by the Juba government to be released and the Ugandan army, which has been backing President Salva Kiir, to withdraw from South Sudan.

"We are abstaining from participating in the next round of peace talks," the rebels said in a statement late on Monday.

But Seyoum Mesfin, chief mediator for the regional IGAD bloc leading the negotiations, said the statement was at odds with previous stance and promises from Machar, a former vice president.

"It contradicts the commitment of their leader who assured the envoys...that he would not put those demands and positions as a condition. That would be tantamount to holding hostage the people and the nation because of those demands," Seyoumn told reporters in Addis Ababa.


The United States expressed concern on Saturday over reported violations of a shaky ceasefire agreement between South Sudan's government and rebel forces and urged the removal of foreign fighters engaged in the conflict.

The U.S. has also previously requested for the South Sudan government to release the last four of a group of 11 detainees held on suspicion of trying to stage a coup.

Seyoum said the talks have been delayed by a day so that seven freed political prisoners - out of the 11 originally arrested - can travel to Addis Ababa to take part in the talks.

However, Seyoum added that the former prisoners did not wish to side with the rebels or the government and might instead form a "third block" in the talks.

"They rather would like us to prepare a sort of a triangular table for their negotiations," Seyoum added.

The rebels in their statement said they had evidence that the Ugandan army was "still actively engaged in combat" despite a ceasefire, and accused Kiir's forces of besieging a United Nations compound housing displaced people in Juba.

Both sides have in the past accused each other of wanton killings and ethnic-based reprisals.

(Writing by Drazen Jorgic; editing by Tom Heneghan)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see
Comments (1)
oxen wrote:
The longer the Kiir invited mercenaries stay in S-Sudan the faster the situation will deteriorate less relevant will the IGAD efforts become because a more unified front of patriotic Sudanese could join hands to kick out the mercenaries of Museveni who are helping the Puppet they can push around at the expense of S-Sudan citizens.
UN should urgently apply punitive sanctions to the Kampala regime. There was no peace in DRC until the regimes that were claiming to help promote peace in the East were flushed out with their M23 group. S-Sudan also needs to rid itself of the warlords that are claiming to help Kiir. S-Sudan needs an inclusive administration, reforms and a well grounded constitution, not the type that Kiir wants to give him dictatorial powers and no term limits to rule.

Feb 10, 2014 6:55pm EST  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.