UK court quashes decision not to hold Litvinenko poisoning inquiry
LONDON (Reuters) - The High Court has quashed a decision by the British government not to hold a public inquiry into the murder of former Russian spy Alexander Litvinenko, who died in London in 2006 after being poisoned with a radioactive substance.
Tuesday's judgment means the government will have to reconsider the decision, a diplomatically sensitive one as a public inquiry could delve into the issue of whether Russia was involved in the killing. Moscow denies any involvement.
Litvinenko, 43, died after drinking tea poisoned with a rare radioactive isotope, polonium-210, in a plush hotel. From his deathbed he accused Russian President Vladimir Putin of ordering his murder, a charge the Kremlin has rejected.
The High Court stopped short of calling for an inquiry actually to take place, but said that Home Secretary Theresa May, the interior minister who refused to hold a public inquiry, would have to revisit the issue.
"If she is to maintain her refusal, she will need better reasons than those given in the decision letter," wrote Lord Justice Richards, handing down the unanimous judgment of the three High Court justices who considered the issue.
"The case for setting up an immediate statutory inquiry as requested by the Coroner is plainly a strong one."
Robert Owen, the coroner in charge of the inquest into Litvinenko's death, had requested an inquiry, stating that he was not able to address the issue of Russia's alleged involvement. His request was turned down last July.
An inquest, a British legal process that takes place in cases of violent or unnatural deaths, is separate from any public inquiry, and Owen had said his examination of any Russian complicity would be flawed because he could not consider secret evidence held by the British government.
In a formal submission to the High Court, he had written that this material "does establish a prima facie case as to the culpability of the Russian state in the death of Alexander Litvinenko".
Lawyers for the former KGB agent's family have argued that Britain wanted to quash any investigation for fear of jeopardizing business deals and souring relations with Moscow which were badly damaged by the Litvinenko poisoning.
Relations deteriorated to a post-Cold War low after British police and prosecutors said there was enough evidence to charge two former KGB agents, Andrei Lugovoy and Dmitry Kovtun.
Home Secretary May had said she had taken into account the interests of Britain's relations with Russia in deciding not to order a public inquiry, but this had not been the main factor.
"We are carefully considering the judgment. The government continues to fully co-operate with the coroner's inquest into Mr Litvinenko's death," a Home Office spokesman said.
In Tuesday's judgment, the High Court said there were "strong reasons of public interest" why the issue of Russian state responsibility should be investigated.
"The material we have seen shows the investigation to have been extremely thorough," Lord Justice Richards wrote.
He added: "The police investigation led to the conclusion that the fatal dose of polonium-210 was probably consumed by Mr Litvinenko on 1 November 2006 when he was in the company of Mr Andrei Lugovoy and Mr Dmitry Kovtun at a hotel in London."
(additional reporting by Michael Holden; editing by Stephen Addison)