Second top Democrat opposes U.S. fast-track trade power

WASHINGTON Wed Feb 12, 2014 6:53pm EST

U.S. House Democratic Leader Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) speaks at a news conference on Capitol Hill in Washington January 16, 2014 file photo REUTERS/Yuri Gripas

U.S. House Democratic Leader Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) speaks at a news conference on Capitol Hill in Washington January 16, 2014 file photo

Credit: Reuters/Yuri Gripas

Related Topics

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - A second senior member of U.S. President Barack Obama's party spoke out on Wednesday against a proposal to give the White House power to fast-track trade deals, delivering another blow to the chances of getting the bill through Congress quickly.

House Democratic leader Nancy Pelosi told a union rally she opposed legislation currently before Congress to grant the U.S. administration so-called Trade Promotion Authority (TPA) to seal trade deals.

"No on Fast Track ... out of the question," she told the United Steelworkers and the BlueGreen Alliance, according to a transcript of remarks provided by her office.

Pelosi's opposition follows a warning by the top Democrat in the Senate, Harry Reid, not to push the TPA bill, which some Democrats fear could lead to trade deals that hurt local jobs and industry and would cost them support in November elections.

Supporters of fast-track power say trading partners involved in negotiating two massive trade deals with the United States will not put their best offers on the table unless they know the final agreement can be submitted to Congress for an up-or-down vote, without amendments.

But others note negotiations started on both the Trans-Pacific Partnership, with 11 other Pacific Rim nations, and the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership with the European Union after the last fast-track power expired in 2007.

That expiry left free trade pacts agreed with South Korea, Panama and Colombia in limbo. All three eventually passed Congress in 2011, though the agreement with South Korea was partly amended.

Pelosi's opposition will make it difficult to push ahead with the bill in the House, where the legislation lacks a Democratic co-sponsor, and its future in the Senate is also uncertain.

Representative Sander Levin, the top Democrat on the House Ways and Means Committee, has said the current bill does not go far enough to involve lawmakers in trade talks or to prevent currency manipulation by trading partners. He is working on an alternative version.

Pelosi said currency manipulation was "a smack in the face of American workers," leaving open the option she might support a version of the bill with tougher currency provisions.

In the Senate, Democratic sponsor Max Baucus is leaving to become the next U.S. ambassador to China and the expected next head of the Senate Finance Committee, Ron Wyden, has expressed reservations about the legislation.

(Reporting by Krista Hughes; Editing by Mohammad Zargham)

FILED UNDER:
We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (2)
catholic wrote:
It is reassuring, for the moment anyway, to see some in Congress heeding the cry of the people of America against this disaster of an agreement. Yet the reps in Congress are not discussing how the corporations could force a country to change its laws if said laws impeded corporate profits, not discussing changes to internet freedoms, not discussing issues with patents and more. Most of all, they are not discussing how many jobs America has lost to foreign countries as a result of “free” trade. We need fair trade, NOT ‘free trade’. This is more important than the annual deficit as it has a greater effect on American jobs versus joblessness.

Feb 12, 2014 8:11pm EST  --  Report as abuse
catholic wrote:
It is reassuring, for the moment anyway, to see some in Congress heeding the cry of the people of America against this disaster of an agreement. Yet the reps in Congress are not discussing how the corporations could force a country to change its laws if said laws impeded corporate profits, not discussing changes to internet freedoms, not discussing issues with patents and more. Most of all, they are not discussing how many jobs America has lost to foreign countries as a result of “free” trade. We need fair trade, NOT ‘free trade’. This is more important than the annual deficit as it has a greater effect on American jobs versus joblessness.

Feb 12, 2014 8:11pm EST  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.