Obama weighs in on contentious union vote at Volkswagen plant

CAMBRIDGE, Md./CHATTANOOGA, Tennessee Fri Feb 14, 2014 5:47pm EST

Volkswagen employees inspect a VW 2012 Passat in the assembly finish department in Chattanooga Tennessee in this December 1, 2011 file photo. REUTERS/Billy Weeks/Files

Volkswagen employees inspect a VW 2012 Passat in the assembly finish department in Chattanooga Tennessee in this December 1, 2011 file photo.

Credit: Reuters/Billy Weeks/Files

Related Topics

CAMBRIDGE, Md./CHATTANOOGA, Tennessee (Reuters) - P resident Barack Obama on Friday waded into a high-stakes union vote at Volkswagen AG's plant in Tennessee, accusing Republican politicians who oppose unionization of being more concerned about German shareholders than U.S. workers.

Obama's comments, made at a closed-door meeting of Democratic lawmakers in Maryland, came as the vote to allow union representation at the Chattanooga plant drew to a close.

The vote will have wide-reaching implications for the auto industry in the South, where all foreign-owned assembly plants employ nonunion labor, and for the United Auto Workers union, which could use a victory to reverse a decades-long downward spiral.

The vote has faced fierce resistance from local Republican politicians and national conservative groups who have warned that a UAW victory could hurt economic growth in Tennessee. While voting was under way on Wednesday, Republican U.S. Senator Bob Corker said VW could announce new investment in the plant if the UAW lost the secret ballot.

Facing accusations that he was seeking to influence the ballot process, Corker defended his statement as "true and factual" in an interview with Reuters, despite Frank Fischer, chief executive of VW Chattanooga, saying that there was "no connection" between the vote and the possible investment.

Obama's interjection in the war of words on Friday, albeit behind closed doors, underscored how much is stake in the three-day vote by VW's 1,550 hourly workers. The vote is due to end at 8:30 p.m. ET and the results could be announced soon after that.

Obama said everyone was in favor of the UAW representing Volkswagen except for local politicians who "are more concerned about German shareholders than American workers," according to a Democratic aide who attended the meeting with Democratic lawmakers in the House of Representatives.

Voting turnout was heaviest on Wednesday, according to local workers, with an estimated 1,000 employees casting ballots. On Friday, when the plant normally is shut down for weekly maintenance, many of the maintenance workers were expected to cast their paper ballots, all of which will be counted individually after the vote closes.

For the UAW, whose U.S. membership has plummeted by 75 percent since 1979, a win could open the door to organizing other foreign-owned auto plants in the U.S. South, the cornerstone of UAW President Bob King's strategy.

A loss could accelerate the decline in membership, now at just under 400,000 from a peak of 1.5 million. It also would reinforce the widely held notion that the UAW cannot make significant inroads in a region that historically has been steadfastly anti-union. Virtually every state in the U.S. South has passed right-to-work legislation that gives workers the choice of joining a union and paying union dues.

For VW, the stakes also are high. The German automaker invested $1 billion in the Chattanooga plant, which began building Passat mid-size sedans in April 2011, after being awarded more than $577 million in state and local incentives.

VW executives have said a new seven-passenger crossover vehicle, due in 2016 and known internally as CrossBlue, could be built at either Chattanooga or Mexico.

VW executives also have said that the bulk of the $7 billion that the company is investing in North America over the next four years is targeted for Mexico, including a new $1.3 billion Audi assembly plant.

Over the past week, however, several Republican politicians from Tennessee have added their voices to the growing anti-union chorus, implying that further subsidies to attract additional VW investment in Chattanooga could be threatened by a UAW victory.

Prodded by IG Metall, the powerful German union that has several representatives on VW's supervisory board, the company has maintained what it calls a "neutral" stance toward the union, although the company agreed to permit UAW representatives into the plant to address workers.

Reached at midmorning on Friday, a member of the anti-union Southern Momentum group said that both union and anti-union workers were just waiting for the vote results.

"We're quiet. The union guys are quiet," said Mike Burton. "There are no politicians making statements, nothing."

(Additional reporting by Paul Lienert in Detroit and Andreas Cremer in Berlin; editing by Matthew Lewis and Ross Colvin)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (99)
wickedjones wrote:
I bet Volkwagen in Gemany is union. Can you tell the Republican Senator that Slavery was outlawed years ago. How bout let the prisoners build cars for 10 cents an hour.

Feb 14, 2014 12:57pm EST  --  Report as abuse
TheRightThing wrote:
@USAPragmatist2 – The workers at this plant are very well paid and have substantial benefits, safe workplaces and all without unions. Bringing the UAW in would not be beneficial to the workers, to VW or to the State of Tennessee. It would benefit only the UAW. This is a reason why the UAW hasn’t made headway into the southern auto factories.

While private sector unions are an arrangement between the workers and the corporations that employ them, which is ok, there is also the public sector union, which is one of the most corrupt arrangements in the history of the US. They have outlived their usefulness and are obsolete.

Anyone interested in how bad public unions are should read the book “Shadowbosses.”

Feb 14, 2014 1:06pm EST  --  Report as abuse
groomer wrote:
Whatever the outcome it is important that the employees are being allowed to decide for themselves. Of course they have to make that decision while ignoring the pro and con noise directed at them. We will soon know the result.

Feb 14, 2014 1:14pm EST  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.