Investor Tom Perkins says progressive taxation 'persecutes' the rich

SAN FRANCISCO Fri Feb 14, 2014 5:51pm EST

Venture capitalist Tom Perkins is interviewed in his office in San Francisco, California September 12, 2011. REUTERS/Robert Galbraith

Venture capitalist Tom Perkins is interviewed in his office in San Francisco, California September 12, 2011.

Credit: Reuters/Robert Galbraith

SAN FRANCISCO (Reuters) - Tom Perkins, the Silicon Valley venture capitalist who compared the plight of the wealthiest Americans to Jews in Nazi Germany, offered up a provocative new idea on what the rich deserve: more votes in public elections for every dollar they pay in taxes.

"If you pay a million dollars, you should get a million votes," Perkins, the retired co-founder of venture capital firm Kleiner Perkins Caufield & Byers, told an audience at San Francisco's Commonwealth Club in comments that he later said were meant to be provocative. He also said that only taxpayers should have the right to vote.

Last month, Perkins wrote a much-discussed letter-to-the-editor published in The Wall Street Journal that likened the Nazi party's war on Jews to what he called "the progressive war on the American one percent, namely the 'rich.'"

He later apologized for the analogy, which included a reference to Kristallnacht, the 1938 attack on Jews in Nazi Germany and Austria. He expressed regret again on Thursday for those words, saying, "You shouldn't compare anything to the Holocaust."

But on Thursday night, he doubled down on his comments about the treatment of the nation's wealthiest citizens.

"The extreme progressivity of taxation is a form of persecution," he said. "I think if you've paid 75 percent of your life's earnings to the government, you are being persecuted."

Perkins said the richest Americans, known as the 1 percent, contribute a great deal to the nation, including donating to charities.

He also discussed editorial attacks on his ex-wife, the best-selling novelist Danielle Steele; said he didn't understand the anger over the buses that ferry technology workers who live San Francisco to their jobs in Silicon Valley; and posited that if Germany had U.S. gun laws, "there would have never been a Hitler."

Perkins's comments come at a time of rising concern over income inequality, both in the country and specifically in San Francisco, where many blame technology workers for rising rents and other costs.

Later in the talk, Perkins made it clear he was trying to goad the audience.

"It's going to make you more angry than my letter to The Wall Street Journal," he said, before floating his idea about allocating votes based on taxes. "How's that?" he said when finished, throwing up his hands and looking out at the laughing audience.

In his career as a venture capitalist, Perkins backed companies including Genentech and Tandem Computers, and his firm has backed Amazon.com Inc, Google Inc and others. He grew up in a working-class family in White Plains, New York.

(Reporting by Sarah McBride; Editing by Leslie Adler)

FILED UNDER:
We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (38)
riposte wrote:
what a absolutely horrible association, rich people and the holocaust..one persecuted for race and religion, compared to, persecution of wealthy americans…wow, i thought ive heard it all….to me, the proper association might have been…,SOME rich persons and the old robber barons ,of early america…want to make a point. leave religion out of it…your showing your true colors

Feb 14, 2014 5:14pm EST  --  Report as abuse
Burns0011 wrote:
He’s a pure plutocrat. And guess what a representative democracy isn’t supposed to be? It’s not supposed to be a plutocracy. But thanks to Chief (in)Justice Roberts, it has now become one because of the unlimited campaign spending he’s allowed by ruling that legal constructs are the same thing as actual people.

Feb 14, 2014 6:09pm EST  --  Report as abuse
pickettjm wrote:
Income distribution is the real problem. The wealthy already own the Republican party and some Democrats.

Feb 14, 2014 6:12pm EST  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.