White House pledges $1 billion to prepare for climate change

WASHINGTON Fri Feb 14, 2014 9:44pm EST

U.S. President Barack Obama walks with farmers Joe Del Bosque and Maria Del Bosque as he tours a drought affected farm field in Los Banos, California February 14, 2014. REUTERS/Kevin Lamarque

U.S. President Barack Obama walks with farmers Joe Del Bosque and Maria Del Bosque as he tours a drought affected farm field in Los Banos, California February 14, 2014.

Credit: Reuters/Kevin Lamarque

Related Topics

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - President Barack Obama on Friday unveiled a $1 billion fund in his 2015 budget to help communities across the United States prepare for the impact of climate change.

The fund, announced in Fresno, California, is part of Obama's pledge to speed federal assistance to the most populous U.S. state.

California is attempting to cope with its worst drought in recorded history, which is threatening its critical agriculture industry, energy production and other industries.

The fund is part of a broader approach to deal with climate change that Obama outlined in his Climate Action Plan in June 2013.

While certain elements of that plan can be carried out through executive action, the fund requires Congressional approval, which makes its future uncertain.

"Given the saliency of the issues in communities across the political spectrum, it seems likely to create some momentum for action in Congress, although obviously that is very hard to say in the current environment," said Billy Pizer, associate professor at the Sanford School of Public Policy at Duke University.

Republicans and some Democrats in coal reliant states have bitterly opposed previous attempts to pass legislation that would put a mandatory limit on carbon emissions. Some have tried to pass legislation that would stop the Environmental Protection Agency from regulating carbon emissions.

The proposal will be formally introduced when Obama unveils his fiscal 2015 budget in March.

It will help communities deal with extreme weather events, such as floods, drought, heat waves, and wildfires, according to the White House. Such disasters include Superstorm Sandy in 2012; the April 2011 tornado outbreak in Southern, Midwestern, and Northeastern United States; and California wildfires in October 2007.

Funds would be used to research how to better prepare for climate change-related effects like rising sea levels and extreme temperatures and encourage local initiatives. Other investments would include "breakthrough technologies and resilient infrastructure" such as building sea walls and more resilient electricity delivery systems to protect vulnerable cities and towns.

The concept of the fund is based on a recommendation made in December 2012 by the think tank Center for American Progress

(CAP).

CAP founder John Podesta is a former chief of staff to President Bill Clinton. Podesta returned to the White House in December as a senior adviser to Obama.

"Every dollar spent on resilience will save federal taxpayers $4 in lower disaster recovery costs," Daniel Weiss, CAP's director of climate strategy, said on Friday, citing a study by the organization. "Now it's up to Congress to make this essential preparedness fund into a reality."

CAP's proposal, called the community resilience fund, would direct the president to appoint a bipartisan panel to design the fund and recommend ways to pay for it.

Nancy Sutley, the director of the White House's Council for Environmental Quality, said on Friday that Obama will use the California drought to highlight the importance of the climate resilience issue.

"This continues to demonstrate the continuing need to focus on resiliency, on reducing risks and vulnerabilities in light of the changing climate," said Sutley, whose last day at the CEQ was Friday. Sutley plans to return to her home state of California this month.

(Reporting by Valerie Volcovici; Editing by Ros Krasny and Richard Chang)

FILED UNDER:
We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (13)
4825 wrote:
Yeah, this global warming we have seen on the east coast this week is awful. Or should that be global cooling? Or maybe that should be climate change? Or maybe it is just the weather, like the weather that the world has seen for centuries. As my grandfather used to say about weather, if you do not like it then give it time and it will change. The climate is the measure of the average pattern of the weather. Weather patterns have always changed, always. Many variables have played into this change over thousands of years. The earth has always cycled between hot periods and cold periods. Man thinks highly of himself to believe he can change climate patterns of any consequence. There are many that believe we can, I don’t.

Feb 14, 2014 11:18pm EST  --  Report as abuse
Bakhtin wrote:
4825

A simple question: when did CO2 stop being a greenhouse gas?

Feb 15, 2014 12:29am EST  --  Report as abuse
USARealist wrote:
If we spent more time focusing on economic growth, then we would more easily be able to adapt to an ever-changing climate. We still have 1 billion people on the planet without electricity and many more living in sub-standard housing. Thus, whenever a 3rd world shack collapses in a heavy rain, ignorant liberal environmentalists blame climate change. Right now, these idiots are blaming climate change for the warm temps at Sochi, which actually AVERAGES 50 deg F (High) and 33 deg F (low) this time of year. I could go on and on….

Feb 15, 2014 8:08am EST  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.