U.S. law firm ensnared in NSA surveillance: NYT report

Sat Feb 15, 2014 7:46pm EST

An illustration picture shows the logo of the U.S. National Security Agency on the display of an iPhone in Berlin, June 7, 2013. REUTERS/Pawel Kopczynski

An illustration picture shows the logo of the U.S. National Security Agency on the display of an iPhone in Berlin, June 7, 2013.

Credit: Reuters/Pawel Kopczynski

Related Topics

(Reuters) - An unnamed U.S. law firm was caught up in the global surveillance of the National Security Agency (NSA) and its overseas partners in Australia, according to a newspaper report on Saturday.

A top secret document obtained by former NSA contractor Edward Snowden shows the firm was monitored while representing a foreign government in trade disputes with the United States, according to The New York Times.

The government of Indonesia retained the law firm for trade talks, which were under surveillance by the Australian Signals Directorate, said the report, citing the February 2013 document.

The Australian agency notified the NSA that it was conducting surveillance of the talks, including communications between Indonesian officials and the U.S. law firm and offered to share the information, according to the Times.

The Australians said that "information covered by attorney-client privilege may be included" in the intelligence gathering, according to the document, which the Times described as a monthly bulletin from an NSA liaison office in Canberra, Australia.

The law firm was not identified in the document, but Mayer Brown, a Chicago-based firm with a global practice, was then advising the Indonesian government on trade, the Times said.

A Mayer Brown spokesman did not respond to a request for comment.

The Times report quoted Mayer Brown lawyer Duane Layton, who was involved in the trade talks, as saying that he did not have any evidence that he or his firm had been under scrutiny by Australian or U.S. intelligence agencies.

"I always wonder if someone is listening, because you would have to be an idiot not to wonder in this day and age," he told the Times. "But I've never really thought I was being spied on."

Commenting on the report, Kent Zimmermann, a consultant at law firm consulting firm Zeughauser Group, told Reuters:

"It was only a matter of time before this happened to a U.S. law firm and was publicly reported ... There is a widely held perception that U.S. law firms are the soft underbelly of corporate America when it comes to vulnerability of spying and hacking."

(Reporting by Casey Sullivan; Editing by Kevin Drawbaugh, Bernard Orr)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (8)
edgyinchina wrote:
Since the Supreme Court ruled that corporations were to be treated as ‘people’ in regards to political campaign contributions, then by extension does this prove that the NSA is spying on ‘people’ ? ?
And this seems to suggest that they were collecting more than just ‘meta-data’…. But most of us knew that all along anyway….

Feb 15, 2014 9:05pm EST  --  Report as abuse
Laster wrote:
The story failed to mention if the NSA had uncovered any terrorist activity at Mayer Brown. That is why the NSA was granted these boundless powers to search communications..right ?

Feb 15, 2014 9:29pm EST  --  Report as abuse
disengage wrote:
in intelligence, you are dealing with some of the smartest people that can be gathered as foes…yes, as humans, agencies may appear to make mistakes, but not that often….if they looked at anyone, there is a reason for it…they earned their stripes with the unseen successes….your alive, living in most cases, your dream…that didn’t happen by magic….

Feb 15, 2014 10:14pm EST  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.