South Sudan rebels say seize oil-producing state capital

JUBA Tue Feb 18, 2014 5:09am EST

1 of 3. A rebel fighter talks to his comrades in a rebel-controlled territory in Upper Nile State February 15, 2014.

Credit: Reuters/Goran Tomasevic

Related Topics

JUBA (Reuters) - South Sudanese rebels said they had taken control of the capital of oil-producing Upper Nile state on Tuesday, in the first fighting in a major town since rebels and the government signed a ceasefire in January.

The Juba government confirmed an assault was launched but denied rebels controlled the town, which lies 650 km (400 miles) north of the national capital Juba. It is also located on the fringes of one country's main oil-producing areas.

The clashes will fuel concerns over the security of South Sudan's northern oil fields - an economic lifeline for the world's newest state - and raise pressure on both camps to revive stalled peace talks in neighboring Ethiopia.

Gathoth Gatkuoth, commander for rebel forces in Upper Nile who is a close ally of former vice president Riek Machar, told Reuters by telephone his forces struck Malakal on Tuesday morning and swiftly retook the dusty market town.

"The rebels have violated the ceasefire and attacked Malakal this morning," Philip Aguer, spokesman for the government army, told Reuters, denying the town had fallen.

Aguer said that fighting continued in Malakal's southern area although he said communication had been lost.

Aguer's comments came after a spokesman for Upper Nile's regional administration told Reuters clashes began at around 7 a.m. (0400 GMT) and that the army was engaged in battles in Malakal's northern, southern and central zones.

A Reuters photographer, who had been travelling with rebels in February, said the forces had been moving towards Malakal.

The rebel move on the town may be aimed at strengthening its hand before a second round of peace talks.

Situated on the banks of the White Nile, Malakal first fell to rebels after fighting broke out in mid-December before government forces recaptured it last month.

President Salva Kiir's government and rebels who support Machar have both accused the other of violating the January 23 ceasefire deal brokered by neighboring east African states.

OIL FIELDS

Thousands of people have been killed and more than 800,000 have fled their homes since fighting was triggered by a power struggle between President Kiir and Machar, his former deputy whom he sacked in July.

U.N. spokesman in South Sudan, Joe Contreras, said a U.N. camp in Malakal, where many of the displaced people had fled for protection, had been caught in the crossfire.

South Sudan says it has been forced to cut oil production by a fifth to 200,000 barrels per day, all of which is pumped from Upper Nile. Oil accounts for 98 percent of government revenues.

Malakal lies about 140 km (90 miles) from Paloch, an oil complex where a key crude oil processing facility is situated.

"All the oil from the fields around Upper Nile is pumped to Paloch," said Jacob Jok Dut, director of the Centre for Democracy and International Analysis who follows the oil industry closely. "If Malakal comes under rebel control, then definitely there will be tension in and around Upper Nile."

Oil firms in South Sudan, a country the size of France, include China National Petroleum Corp, India's ONGC Videsh and Malaysia's Petronas. Work in some fields has been suspended.

Peace talks had been due to resume last week, but were held up by a rebel demand that four remaining political prisoners held by the government be released and the Ugandan military, which is supporting Kiir's army, withdraw from South Sudan.

Government officials privately acknowledge negotiations are unlikely to make progress until the senior political figures are freed. The government says the detainees tried to launch a coup.

(Additional reporting by Goran Tomasevic and Drazen Jorgic; Writing by Richard Lough; Editing by Edmund Blair and Jon Boyle)

FILED UNDER:
We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (1)
oxen wrote:
War begets war, one side invites mercenaries, so does the other. One side gets unauthorised regimes to help it, so will the other. One side tries to annihilate the the other along tribal lines, so will the other, the Kiir side attacks Leer(home town or Machar and eliminates all the elderly, children, women and all those that could not flee, well may be a matter of time before a revenge attack happens to the Kiir side/relatives. The notion that Kiir will count on his masters that he is puppet to and thus getting mercenaries is a good idea is misguided. IGAD/UN/AU needs to develop a comprehensive solution. Propping up Kiir is not a good solution. Machar may get help to counter balance the help Kiir is getting from Uganda regime . In the end the civilians, especially those unable to cater for themselves are the ones to suffer the most. South Sudan is a failed state already, the e re-set is needed asp.

Feb 18, 2014 3:54pm EST  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.