North Carolina defends coal ash oversight after second leak

RALEIGH, North Carolina Wed Feb 19, 2014 6:55pm EST

1 of 3. The Duke Energy coal-fired power plant is seen from the Dan River in Eden, North Carolina February 19, 2014. North Carolina state officials defended their oversight of coal ash ponds on Wednesday, a day after a second leak was found to be threatening a river already tainted by toxic sludge from a spill earlier this month.

Credit: Reuters/Chris Keane

Related Topics

RALEIGH, North Carolina (Reuters) - North Carolina state officials defended their oversight of coal ash ponds on Wednesday, a day after a second leak was found to be threatening a river already tainted by toxic sludge from a spill earlier this month.

The state ordered Duke Energy Corp on Tuesday to plug the second leak of arsenic-laced wastewater into the Dan River from its decommissioned Eden power plant, this time through a 36-inch stormwater pipe.

The state's Department of Natural Resources (DNER) said the leak had been 90 percent contained.

The agency has come under fire for its handling of the state's coal ash ponds, which it concedes are contaminating groundwater as well as harming aquatic life. It filed suit against Duke last year, and then proposed a settlement, which is opposed by environmental groups.

DNER Secretary John Skvarla said the proposed settlement, which has been on hold since the spill, would prevent delays in cleanup that may be caused by a prolonged trial.

"This perception has been created that we are adversaries with the citizens' groups, when in fact we are on the same side of the table," Skvarla told a news conference.

"We all have the same outcome in mind ... to clean up the spill, protect the environment and protect the people of North Carolina."

Frank Holleman, senior attorney for the Southern Environmental Law Center, rejected Skvarla's comments. He said DENR's lawsuit was meant to derail litigation planned by his organization on behalf of several citizen groups.

"How can we be on the same side of the table if they don't even let us come into the room?" he asked.

Tuesday's spill came less than three weeks after thousands of tons of sludge spilled into the Dan River when a 48-inch pipe broke under the 27-acre ash pond, Duke said.

Federal prosecutors issued a second set of subpoenas to DNER on Tuesday as part of a widening probe into possible felony violations at North Carolina's 14 coal ash sites.

Prosecutors are investigating whether a crime was committed in the first spill, in which Duke said 30,000 to 39,000 tons of ash were released into the river.

The coal-fired plant in Eden was built in the 1940s and retired in 2012.

(Writing by Ian Simpson; editing by Gunna Dickson)

FILED UNDER:
We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (8)
morbas wrote:
This is not acceptable, reaches the governor level of responsibility as McCrory is the executive in charge of management of the State Legislature. That is two recent spills of a type that reaches Superfund clean up levels. Given his own Legislative parties opposition to environmental regulations, he represents the poorest and most incompetent government body of North Carolina dating to 1776 and 1971.

He appears to violate Sec 6 “Separation of powers.
The legislative, executive, and supreme judicial powers of the State government shall be forever separate and distinct from each other.”

He appears to violate “Sec 9 Frequent elections. For redress of grievances and for amending and strengthening the laws, elections shall be often held.”

Sec. 10.  “Free elections. All elections shall be free”.

We need to repeal and replace the governor with one that has an unaffiliated management scope.
We need to amend the NC Constitution to provide recall by power of the ballot.

morbas(i)

Feb 19, 2014 7:52am EST  --  Report as abuse
Flash1022 wrote:
Another incident due to low taxes and deregulation in the name of job creation!

Feb 19, 2014 1:00pm EST  --  Report as abuse
Flash1022 wrote:
Another incident due to low taxes and deregulation in the name of job creation!

Feb 19, 2014 1:00pm EST  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.

BOSTON, ONE YEAR LATER