Fresh from win over UAW, Norquist vows anti-union push

Thu Feb 20, 2014 12:03pm EST

Americans for Tax Reform President Grover Norquist (R) participates in the Washington Ideas Forum at the Newseum in Washington November 13, 2013. REUTERS/Jonathan Ernst

Americans for Tax Reform President Grover Norquist (R) participates in the Washington Ideas Forum at the Newseum in Washington November 13, 2013.

Credit: Reuters/Jonathan Ernst

Related Topics

(Reuters) - Grover Norquist's trademark cause is fighting high taxes, but the savvy conservative Republican lobbyist just scored a big win on another front - fighting unions - and he wants more, betting on what he sees as a broad shift in U.S. labor politics.

Fresh from helping to crush a unionization drive at a Volkswagen AG plant in Tennessee, Norquist outlined an anti-union strategy that ties labor to liberals, with the long-term goal of sapping union financial support for Democrats.

In a telephone interview on Wednesday, he argued that recent events show Republicans can fight and win against unions. "Not only can you, but if you don't, you're a weenie," he said.

Norquist heads Americans for Tax Reform, famous for its pledge not to raise taxes that it gets many politicians to sign, though the group also has long been active on other issues.

It recently rebranded and reinvigorated its anti-union affiliate as the Center for Worker Freedom, which opposed a high-stakes United Auto Workers' effort to unionize the VW plant in Chattanooga. That effort failed on Friday.

While the VW workers' vote to reject the union was a blow to the UAW, it was a vindication for Norquist and his new lieutenant, Matt Patterson, who managed a nearly yearlong campaign against the UAW in the eastern Tennessee city.

Chattanooga is deep inside conservative Republican turf, so Patterson pointedly tied the UAW to President Barack Obama and fellow Democrats in his campaign there to persuade VW workers and the larger community to oppose the union at the plant.

Norquist pledged that more of the same is coming from his group at other, non-unionized foreign-owned auto factories in the U.S. South that the UAW wants to represent, arguing the broad labor landscape is shifting in Republicans' favor.

"Everybody who wants to steal your guns is funded by the unions. Everybody who wants to raise your taxes is funded by the unions. Everybody who wants to borrow too much money is funded by the unions," Norquist said.

"Whatever center-right issue you care about, the unions are on the other team. Unions aren't good at anything," he said, declining to detail who funds his group's anti-union activities.


Labor unions in the United States are closely allied with and provide major funding to the Democratic Party. Republicans generally oppose unions, lining up with business interests that finance a variety of anti-union pressure groups.

Unions have long been in decline, with the proportion of U.S. workers belonging to one at a historic low of 11.3 percent in 2013, down from 20.1 percent in 1983, government data showed.

The labor movement has stayed stronger, however, among public-sector employees, 35.3 percent of whom were union members last year, versus just 6.7 percent of private-sector workers.

Until recently, Norquist said, Republicans were resigned to public-sector union power. That changed when Wisconsin Governor Scott Walker and New Jersey Governor Chris Christie challenged the power of public-sector unions in their states, he said.

At the same time, after years of turmoil, the U.S. National Labor Relations Board recently stabilized, with Obama Democrats in a majority on the board of the federal agency, which supervises union elections and polices unfair labor practices.

"Both playing fields, public and private, are changing. Obama's put his finger on the scales to help unionization in the private sector ... while the Republicans have been able to change the rules for a lot of the states," Norquist said.

A long-term political goal of stepped-up attacks on unions will be to reduce their capacity to fund Democrats, he said.

In Chattanooga, the UAW seemed confident before the election that it would win a majority of workers' votes for unionization.

Norquist recalled: "That meant we had to raise doubts as to what this is all about. Hence the focus on the challenges with the UAW, with their political view; with how left-wing they are; how they give money to everybody who wants to steal your guns and do crazy things with your resources; how they treat you with contempt and how they'd destroy the city."

Since the Chattanooga victory, which Norquist and Patterson acknowledged came as a result of many factors, not just their campaign, potential client interest in the anti-union affiliate that Patterson is managing has picked up, Norquist said.

"People have called and said how impressed they were with the effort," he said. "They haven't said they plan to show up with large quantities of cash in a suitcase or something, but they've been encouraged."

(Reporting by Kevin Drawbaugh; Editing by Howard Goller and Jonathan Oatis)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see
Comments (6)
What a douchebag, this guy is one of the root causes of the right orthodoxy, he cares not about what he can do for his country, but how he can the country into a corporate oligarchy.

Feb 20, 2014 2:15pm EST  --  Report as abuse
knoppster wrote:
More is being revealed on this matter, and while the UAW may have lost this vote, the people at VW are finally speaking out. It turns out that while they held their voices during vote, and the drive up to the vote, they were not threatening the workers in any way. VW wanted the Union, and while they set up shop in the south, it may have been due to more than the area being hostile to organized labor. There is another German owned factory in the region, and now the workers know that their plant will not be shut down, and all of them unemployed, as they have been led to believe if they organize. They might have lost the battle, but the UAW may yet win the war. The workers in Germany very much has a say in the operation of the company, and already they are reevaluating future expansion in the south. I hope they are ready for the right wing venom that will be sent their way. I am waiting for the N word to be thrown at them, and it has nothing to do with color. The politicians that distorted what would happen if the workers voted in the Union, must be stunned that people from other countries do things differently, and now that the Germans are finally speaking out, and showing that they were in fact in favor of the Union, these same politicians now must explain their lies. There are not enough towels for norquist, corker, and their allies, to wipe the egg off of their face. This was only the beggining, the organization fight in southern auto plants is under way. I expect the usual response from the anti-Union crowd here, but they can save their breath about adam smith, union bad republican good, rush is right, rhetoric. I would like to know how they feel about the fact that far from not wanting a Union, VW wanted it, and that this is how they do business, and they are succesfull working this way. Also, I would like to know how the anti-Union crowd feels about statements coming out of Germany that VW might not invest further in the south as a result of this vote.

Feb 20, 2014 4:19pm EST  --  Report as abuse
Larin wrote:
Employee participation in makes for great products.
As a consumer, I choose these companies products. Not buying Passat if it goes non union.

Feb 21, 2014 11:58am EST  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.