U.S. expected to keep oil embargo even if Iran nuclear deal struck

VIENNA Thu Feb 20, 2014 8:38am EST

A cameraman films outside Palais Coburg hotel where nuclear talks are taking place in Vienna February 19, 2014. REUTERS/Heinz-Peter Bader

A cameraman films outside Palais Coburg hotel where nuclear talks are taking place in Vienna February 19, 2014.

Credit: Reuters/Heinz-Peter Bader

Related Topics

VIENNA (Reuters) - A unilateral U.S. oil embargo on Iran is expected to remain in place even if a long-term nuclear agreement between Tehran and six world powers is reached that includes an easing of international sanctions, a U.S. official said on Thursday.

The embargo pre-dates the decade-long nuclear dispute with Iran. Washington cut off diplomatic ties with Tehran during a hostage crisis shortly following the 1979 Islamic Revolution and began imposing sanctions around the same time.

"The American domestic oil embargo is expected to remain in place even if a comprehensive agreement is reached," the U.S. official told Reuters on condition of anonymity.

Western diplomats say U.S. companies would be unhappy about being left out if European Union and U.N. sanctions are lifted, allowing non-U.S. firms to resume business with the Islamic Republic. Iranian officials say they would have no problem with American oil companies returning to Iran.

The U.S. official spoke after Iran and the six powers - Britain, China, France, Germany, Russia and the United States - agreed on an agenda and schedule for talks aimed at ending the dispute over Tehran's nuclear ambitions.

Earlier, a senior U.S. official said the United States would like to see sanctions lifted, but that cannot happen until an agreement on Iran's nuclear project is reached. Another U.S. official said those remarks referred only to sanctions imposed after the dispute over the nuclear program broke out in 2002.

(Additional reporting by Fredrik Dahl and Parisa Hafezi; Editing by Larry King)

FILED UNDER:
We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (3)
sabrefencer wrote:
with, a US official representing Obama , I wouldn’t bet on anything that he says being firm….like previous statements, the line in the sand, or being an inclusive president…no, not firm at all

Feb 20, 2014 8:36am EST  --  Report as abuse
COindependent wrote:
Big deal, a non-event. We do not need to import Iranian oil (as we haven’t since 1979) and the Iranians can sell all they produce to China and India. So much for the power of unilateral sanctions. Why is this news?

Feb 20, 2014 8:48am EST  --  Report as abuse
tmc wrote:
We don’t want more cheap oil on the market because it makes Canadian & American oil have even less of a margin. If it gets cheap enough on the markets it becomes to expensive to keep these operations going.

Feb 20, 2014 11:31am EST  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.