TransCanada weighs next steps after U.S. court's Keystone ruling

TORONTO Thu Feb 20, 2014 11:35am EST

TransCanada President and CEO Russ Girling (2nd L) announces the new Energy East Pipeline during a news conference in Calgary, Alberta, August 1, 2013. REUTERS/Todd Korol

TransCanada President and CEO Russ Girling (2nd L) announces the new Energy East Pipeline during a news conference in Calgary, Alberta, August 1, 2013.

Credit: Reuters/Todd Korol

TORONTO (Reuters) - TransCanada Corp (TRP.TO) said on Thursday it is considering how to proceed with its Keystone XL pipeline, a day after a court overruled the Nebraska governor's decision to allow the controversial line to pass through the Midwestern state.

"We are disappointed and disagree with the decision of the Nebraska district court and will now analyze the judgment and decide what next steps may be taken," the company said in a statement. "Nebraska's attorney general has filed an appeal."

Canada's No. 2 pipeline operator also reported higher fourth-quarter earnings on strong results from its gas pipelines and higher volumes on its broader Keystone oil pipeline system. Shares were down C$1.02 at C$48.88 Thursday morning on the Toronto Stock Exchange.

On Wednesday, the District Court of Lancaster County voided state approval of the Keystone XL pipeline project, siding with landowners who said legislation allowing the $5.4 billion line disregarded their property rights.

The move is expected to further delay the project, which has spent more than five years in regulatory limbo, though it is unclear how long the Nebraska appeal will take.

Supporters say the pipeline, which would transport crude from Alberta's oil sands to refineries on the U.S. Gulf Coast, would create thousands of jobs and cut U.S. fuel costs, while critics say it would harm the environment and hasten climate change by promoting expansion of Alberta's oil sands.

U.S. President Barack Obama will have the final say on the 1,179-mile (1,898-km) line, with the project expected to come online two years after a Presidential Permit is issued. TransCanada said it has so far spent $2.2 billion on the line.

With Keystone XL potentially facing another indefinite delay, focus may now shift to the company's other large development project, the $12 billion Energy East pipeline, which would pump crude from Alberta and Saskatchewan to refineries in Eastern Canada and a deepwater export port at Saint John, New Brunswick.

TransCanada said it expects to apply for permits for Energy East by mid-2014, with first deliveries anticipated in 2018. The proposed pipeline would ship 1.1 million barrels per day (bpd), about 30 percent more than Keystone XL.

"With $30-odd billion in development, they really are more than just one $6 billion pipeline," Steven Paget, an analyst with FirstEnergy Capital in Calgary, said of TransCanada.

While Keystone XL would transport oil to existing markets in the United States, Energy East would carry crude to the coast, opening up access to valuable new international markets for Canadian oil. TransCanada is also developing smaller oil pipelines in Canada and numerous natural gas projects.

The Calgary-based company's net income in the fourth quarter was C$420 million, or 59 Canadian cents per share, compared with C$306 million, or 43 Canadian cents per share, a year earlier.

Comparable earnings, which exclude one-time items, rose to C$410 million, or 58 Canadian cents per share, from C$318 million, or 45 Canadian cents per share.

Analysts on average expected net income of 59 Canadian cents per share, according to Thomson Reuters I/B/E/S.

TransCanada also increased its quarterly dividend by 4 percent to 48 Canadian cents.

(Editing by Lisa Von Ahn and Paul Simao and Alden Bentley)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see
Comments (8)
zevulon wrote:
the real tragedy of the keystone pipeline is that the u.s. is now becoming like russia.

every corrupt beauracrat and court needs to be paid off and bribed in order for business to get done.

people who build things, mine things, and create things of value that people willingly pay for —food, transport, white goods, and energy—–these things now have a major corruption tax.

and if the companies won’t pay the corruption tax which gets handed down in the price of consumer goods—than consumers won’t be allowed to get those goods.

this is primarily how the soviet union collapsed—from within. and it is how the u.s. is slowly collapsing.

the biggest threat to national security, national energy policy, and the health and wealth of the nation is not terrorism–it is institutionalized corruption all over the country.

DC and NYC set the tone and the local institutions of the rest of the 50 states have nothing to worry about, for surely if they get ‘caught’ by the watchmen, those federal and new york city watchmen too shall be paid off.

if there’s any silver lining to the keystone cloud–it’s that there’s really no rush to exploit shale oil, because it’s not all that profitable to transport to china. our oil supplies are safe for now.

Feb 20, 2014 10:41am EST  --  Report as abuse
TomMariner wrote:
TransCanada — forget us — our present Administration and judicial system will use its power to stop any fossil fuel anything. And, if you’re counting on the voters to get rational about it, and get a balanced government back — forget that too — the same Administration and judicial coupled with the US media will make sure that the same blindly fanatical blocking of anything they do not like will go on for a generation.

Build that pipeline to the left coast to make it convenient for the Chinese ships to willingly pay for your energy source — they have lots of green projects going too, but they are not killing their own economy by abruptly blocking all use until they are ready.

Feb 20, 2014 10:51am EST  --  Report as abuse
AlkalineState wrote:
Eminent domain from a Canadian company. Yes, that’s a sound idea. And when they write the easement for themselves, they can do it in French.

And you rednecks were singing along with this scheme. Good luck with it now.

Feb 20, 2014 11:56am EST  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.