U.S. leads pushback against emerging market angst at G20

SYDNEY Fri Feb 21, 2014 10:12am EST

U.S. Treasury Secretary Jack Lew and Australian Treasurer Joe Hockey (R) walk from a joint news conference at the G20 Finance Ministers meeting in Sydney, February 21, 2014. REUTERS/Jason Reed

U.S. Treasury Secretary Jack Lew and Australian Treasurer Joe Hockey (R) walk from a joint news conference at the G20 Finance Ministers meeting in Sydney, February 21, 2014.

Credit: Reuters/Jason Reed

Related Topics

SYDNEY (Reuters) - The world's rich nations pushed back on Friday against emerging market complaints about the spillover effects of their monetary policies, saying they had to get their own houses in order and get with the agenda of boosting global growth.

As finance ministers and central bank chiefs from the Group of 20 developed and emerging countries gather ahead of a weekend meeting in Sydney, many are already talking at cross purposes.

Emerging nations want the U.S. Federal Reserve to calibrate its winding down of stimulus so as to mitigate the impact on their economies and financial markets. Developed members reply that the troubles in the emerging world are mostly homegrown and domestic interest rates have to be set with domestic recoveries in mind.

A draft of the communique, reported by Bloomberg News, highlighted how the push for growth had trumped concerns about volatility in emerging markets that had threatened to overshadow the meeting.

"We commit to developing new measures to significantly raise global growth, while maintaining fiscal sustainability," Bloomberg quoted the draft as saying.

"We recognize accommodative monetary policy settings in advanced economies will need to normalize in due course, in line with stronger growth."

Developed market policymakers see little risk of the recent market turmoil spiraling into the kind of contagion which prompted concerted and coordinated action from the G20 following the global financial crisis.

"Emerging markets need to take steps of their own to get their fiscal house in order and put structural reforms in place," U.S. Treasury Secretary Jack Lew said at a financial conference in Sydney ahead of the ministerial meetings.

That was a sentiment very much echoed by the finance ministers of Japan, Britain and Germany.

German's Wolfgang Schaeuble told CNBC that emerging countries first had to do their homework, before demanding solidarity from the rest of the G20.

Japan's Taro Aso said the Fed's tapering of its stimulus program was positive as it reflected an improving U.S. economy, even if it raised the risk of sharp capital outflows from other countries.

"It is important for emerging economies to correct these things by making their own efforts," Aso said in Tokyo.

Developing nations from South Africa to Turkey to Russia have seen their currencies crumble in recent months as the prospect of higher returns in the United States sucked foreign funds from their economies.

South Korea Deputy Prime Minister, Minister of Strategy and Finance Hyun Oh Seok suggested the Fed and other major central banks could at least strive to avoid surprises in their policy.

"QE tapering should be undertaken in a very orderly manner and carefully calibrated given the global economy today is very much interconnected," Hyun told Reuters, referring to quantitative easing, usually in the form of central bank purchases of bonds or other assets.


The head of the U.S. Treasury also had pointed advice for other major nations, calling on China, Japan and Europe to make domestic demand the engine room of growth.

"I think it's a cross-cutting theme to what we see as the challenge for the global economy," said Lew.

"The U.S. recovery is healthy and moving very much in the right direction and picking up velocity, but it can't make up for a lack of demand and growth in the other key economies."

Australian Treasurer Joe Hockey is trying to bring some much-needed focus to the G20, proposing members sign on to ambitious growth agendas, and hold each other to account for delivering them.

And he's having some early success.

Setting such a growth target was "a good idea", IMF Managing Director Christine Lagarde said on Thursday. "There is a potential for doing better and more, if only countries take some action."

He won further support on Friday from Britain's finance minister, George Osborne.

"If we could adopt a target, or an aspiration, that would be a good thing," Osborne said in Sydney. "I'm with Joe on this."

The need for some sort of fresh stimulus was highlighted by a grim report from The Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development released on Friday.

It warned that sweeping reforms were urgently needed to boost productivity and lower barriers to trade to avoid a new era of slow growth and stubbornly high unemployment.

"Our message to G20 finance ministers today will be unambiguous: go structural. Go structural to achieve a strong and sustainable balance inclusive growth," OECD Secretary-General Angel Gurria told reporters.

Yet the idea of setting concrete goals for the G20 has caused nothing but friction in the past, with proposals to target fiscal and current account deficits coming to nothing in the end.

The proposal has already drawn skepticism, with a German government source criticizing the idea as a "slightly antiquated form for economic planning".

Yet late on Friday, a G20 source said there was a growing chance the final communique from this weekend's meeting would indeed include a single goal for growth.

"It's quite likely there will be a target for global growth. None for each country," the source said.

(Additional reporting by Ian Chua, Cecile Lefort, Jane Wardell, Leika Kihara, Lincoln Feast; Editing by John Mair & Kim Coghill)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (4)
Greenspan2 wrote:
It seems that the “growth” model pursued so religiously has not worked out well for either the global economy or for a large number of global citizens, particularly the unemployed or overworked and underpaid. Maybe some more variables are needed in the equation, such as sustainability, consideration of negative externalities imposed on society due to pollution, corporate subsidies, and worker exploitation, and also factor in quality of life. What happened to the concept of working to live as opposed to living to work? Just who is all this “growth” actually benefiting?

Feb 20, 2014 10:39pm EST  --  Report as abuse
WhyMeLord wrote:
Even schoolchildren realize that the world cannot sustain endless growth without severe consequences. The status quo has become a dirty word among economists obsessed with feathering their own nests.
Unchecked, endless growth makes paupers out of senior citizens who must exist on fixed incomes, and would end up unable to comfortably exist on their savings. Growth only benefits those still working, and many of us seniors exist outside that narrow band of individuals.

Feb 20, 2014 11:13pm EST  --  Report as abuse
Tiu wrote:
After force-feeding with hot money they are now being told to sort themselves out. I love it – hilarious. What could possibly go wrong?

Feb 21, 2014 3:20am EST  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.