U.N. Security Council to vote on Syria aid resolution Saturday

UNITED NATIONS Thu Feb 20, 2014 8:24pm EST

A man walks amid rubble of damaged buildings in the al-Myassar neighbourhood of Aleppo February 19, 2014. REUTERS/Jalal Al-Mamo

A man walks amid rubble of damaged buildings in the al-Myassar neighbourhood of Aleppo February 19, 2014.

Credit: Reuters/Jalal Al-Mamo

UNITED NATIONS (Reuters) - The U.N. Security Council will vote on Saturday on a resolution to boost humanitarian aid access in Syria, where the United Nations says 9.3 million people need help, although it is unclear if Russia and China will support or veto the draft.

Australian U.N. Ambassador Gary Quinlan, who co-authored the text with envoys from Jordan and Luxembourg, told reporters the vote would be held at 11 a.m. (1600 GMT) on Saturday.

The text includes demands for cross-border aid access and an end to shelling and aerial bombardment, including barrel bombs, and threatens "further steps" in the event of non-compliance. These were among the main sticking points during almost two weeks of negotiations on the draft, said diplomats.

Russia, supported by China, has shielded its ally Syria on the U.N. Security Council during the three-year-long civil war. They have vetoed three resolutions condemning Syria's government and threatening it with possible sanctions.

Western diplomats said a possible Friday vote by the 15-member council was pushed to Saturday after Russia said it needed more time.

"A delegation has requested to have some time to get some instructions from its capital," French U.N. Ambassador Gerard Araud said, although he did not name the country.

Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov said on Monday Russia would block the adoption of a resolution that allowed aid convoys to enter Syria without the consent of the Damascus government.

During a visit to Baghdad on Thursday, Lavrov said the resolution should spell out that cross-border aid deliveries should be organized in accordance with international humanitarian law, which requires a government's consent for such a move.

"I don't see why people cannot reiterate this, especially since we have so many examples when not food, not medicine, but arms and other equipment for the fighters are being supplied across border," Lavrov said. "If people are so concerned about using this particular method of providing assistance they could use the same routes they use to supply arms."

Chinese Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Hua Chunying said on Thursday that China believes any action by the Security Council "should be conducive to pushing for a political solution to the Syria problem."

"The relevant action should also respect the U.N.'s guiding principles on humanitarian aid, upholding fairness and neutrality," she told reporters in Beijing.

Western members of the Security Council have been considering a humanitarian resolution for almost a year. After months of talks, the council adopted a non-binding statement on October 2 urging more access to aid, but that statement produced only a little administrative progress.

U.N. aid chief Valerie Amos last week urged the Security Council to act to increase humanitarian access in Syria. Amos has repeatedly expressed frustration that violence and red tape have slowed aid deliveries to a trickle.

The United Nations has said that well over 100,000 people have been killed in the civil war. The opposition Syrian Observatory for Human Rights has said that more than 136,000 have been killed since a revolt against President Bashar al-Assad began in March 2011.

(Additional reporting by Ben Blanchard in Beijing and Ahmed Rasheed in Baghdad; Editing by Mohammad Zargham)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (4)
it’s time PUTIN puts up or shuts up. It’s time tea baggers in America put up or shut up. it’s time AMERICAN’s put up or shut up.

Feb 20, 2014 9:15pm EST  --  Report as abuse
disengage wrote:
With Putin, supported by the Chinese, sure of their abilities to blunt anything worthwhile, from the west, the likelihood of anything meaningful, done for the Syrian refugees, is probably close to the bottom of success. Maybe, if the world, is able to come together, to save millions of refugees from Syria, thousands of lives maybe saved. That would take resolve on the wests part. For Putin, has determined, with Iran and china’s full support, he can do anything. Someone, please wake Pres Obama, from his ridiculous, deaf dumb and blind, attitude. He cannot keep avoiding world responsibilities, no matter how much he parrots his ridiculous rhetoric.

Feb 20, 2014 9:49pm EST  --  Report as abuse
Fromkin wrote:
“I don’t see why people cannot reiterate this, especially since we have so many examples when not food, not medicine, but arms and other equipment for the fighters are being supplied across border,” Lavrov said. “If people are so concerned about using this particular method of providing assistance they could use the same routes they use to supply arms.”

“The relevant action should also respect the U.N.’s guiding principles on humanitarian aid, upholding fairness and neutrality,” she told reporters in Beijing.

In other words there is no chance for a Lybian style “humanitarian” UN resolution.

We know the US, Saud Arabia and Israel(coalition of the willing evils) are preparing to unjustly attack Syria mainly from Jordan.

The UN should not make their job easier by handcuffing Syria with an unjust resolution. These aggressors must at least have the dignity and courage to fight fair instead of using the UN as an enabler.

Feb 21, 2014 12:17am EST  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.

Full focus