Protesters make noise over New York plan to kill off mute swans

NEW YORK Sat Feb 22, 2014 7:02am EST

Related Topics

NEW YORK (Reuters) - The graceful mute swan, in lore long associated with romance and fidelity, might not meet a fairy tale ending in New York.

The state is planning to eliminate by 2025 the entire population of the regal wild mute swans, which its Department of Environmental Conservation calls an aggressive, invasive species and a danger to people and native wildlife populations.

But protests are mounting to block the plan that would use tactics such as shooting the birds and puncturing their eggs.

"It's a ludicrous plan," said David Karopkin, founder and director of GooseWatch NYC, a wildlife advocacy group that said the state's concerns are overblown.

Most of the state's 2,200 mute swans - both wild and in captivity - are found in highly populated areas, in and around New York City and its northern suburbs in the Hudson Valley.

"When people live close to each other, conflicts are inevitable, but we don't kill each other off. But when people live next to animals and conflicts are inevitable, we respond with lethal methods," Karopkin said.

Although the swans are known to be territorial, especially when protecting their eggs or their young, there are no known attacks on humans in New York, Karopkin said.

The state did not immediately respond to a request for comment on any mute swan attacks reported in New York.

Like the population control plans for mute swans already enacted in Michigan, Maryland and Delaware, the New York proposal targets only birds in the wild, not the ones on private lands or in city parks.

Originally brought in from Europe in the late 1800s to add flair to American estates, mute swans are now consuming large amounts of aquatic vegetation needed by native waterfowl and contaminating the water with their feces, which can contain the bacteria E.Coli, state wildlife experts said.

"With mute swans, there is considerable concern about destruction to native habitat by this non-native species," said wildlife expert Dr. Paul Curtis, who works in the Department of Natural Resources at Cornell University.

The mute swan's steadily increasing population in New York over several decades has put a strain on native species like the black tern, an endangered wetlands bird that has now disappeared where the swans have colonized, he said.

"I think people have sort of a romantic connection with swans...But they need to be managed responsibly," Curtis said.

This week marked a final chance for the public to comment on the state's draft plan to control the wild swan population employing methods such as "oiling, puncturing, shaking, freezing, replacing or removing eggs; destruction of nests; sterilization of birds; shooting; and capture and removal of swans to be euthanized or turned over to persons licensed to keep the birds in captivity."

GooseWatch NYC said it has collected 20,000 signatures on an online petition to scrap the proposal. State Senator Tony Avella of Queens has introduced a bill that would put a two-year moratorium on any elimination efforts.

"I was horrified to learn that our state wildlife agency would make such an extreme, unfounded proposal, and do not believe that the DEC has provided evidence to justify the elimination of these beautiful swans," Avella said.

The black-masked, white bird's body typically measures between 50 to 60 inches in length, with wingspan reaching up to 90 inches. Despite their name, mute swans are capable of making hissing, grunting and snorting sounds, although they don't honk like other swans.

Over the past century, mute swans have become a symbol of love. The birds mate for life, and when two mute swans sit beak to beak, the curve of their long necks make a heart-shape.

Animal advocates like Karopkin said there has been little proof the swans are damaging the environment.

"Non-native does not equal invasive," he said.

"There are many examples of wildlife in North America that were brought here from other continents that have been successful. It's a subjective decision that the harm is outweighing the benefit the animals provide," Karopkin said.

But to wildlife experts like Professor Curtis, the mute swans pose the same kind of danger to the natural habitat as other non-native species, including the notorious snakehead fish, a predator native to rivers and lakes in Asia and a dangerous, invasive species in American waters.

"It's a fair comparison," Curtis said. "Because both snakehead fish and swans are invasive, exotic species. Both have potential detrimental impacts on the environment and so I think both federal and state government agencies want to minimize the impacts of invasive species, whether insects or birds."

(Editing by Barbara Goldberg and Gunna Dickson)

FILED UNDER:
We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (4)
decdipsticks wrote:
“But to wildlife experts like Professor Curtis, the mute swans pose the same kind of danger to the natural habitat as other non-native species”

The problem with this is Professor Curtis can totally ignore what humans and their activities and their domestic animals/invasive species are doing to the natural habitat. And this TOTALLY defies reality AND all common sense. No, you simply cannot ignore this. Doing otherwise is simply misleading propaganda.

Among other things humans have destroyed over 60% of the wetlands; GE dumped over 1 million pounds of cancer causing PCBs into the Hudson, run off from agriculture is THE leading cause of impaired water quality.

“According to the E.P.A.’s own studies, AGRICULTURAL RUNOFF IS THE LEADING CAUSE OF IMPAIRED WATER QUALITY. THE AMOUNT OF MANURE PRODUCED BY FACTORY FARMS IS STAGGERING. THE AGENCY ESTIMATES THAT THOSE OPERATIONS CREATE BETWEEN 500 MILLION AND 1 BILLION TONS OF MANURE, THREE TIMES AS MUCH WASTE AS HUMANS PRODUCE IN THE UNITED STATES. The task of keeping those hundreds of millions of tons of animal waste out of rivers, lakes and estuaries is enormous, clearly requiring a strong set of revised regulations for the handling of factory-farm waste, including provisions for tracking waste when it’s been moved offsite.” http://www.nytimes.com/2013/06/15/opinion/the-epa-backs-off-on-factory-farms.html?hp&_r=0

DOG POOP

DOG WASTE IS CITED AS THE 3RD OR 4TH LARGEST CONTRIBUTOR OF BACTERIAL POLLUTION IN URBAN WATERSHEDS.

http://www.keepitcleanpartnership.org/pollution-prevention/scoop-the-poop/

“For example, a study of waterborne disease outbreaks from 1986 to 1998 conducted by the Centers for Disease Control demonstrated that in every case where the pathogen could be identified, it most likely originated in livestock.’

http://www.sustainabletable.org/906/waste-management

ALBANY, N.Y.—Billions of gallons of untreated sewage flow into New York waterways annually, but it remains difficult to tell when and where to avoid contact despite a new law mandating prompt public notice.

http://www.theepochtimes.com/n3/211572-billions-of-gallons-of-sewage-contaminate-ny-waters/#ixzz2oi0XGFu3

Take drugs, for example. A 2008 Associated Press investigation found that drinking water in at least 24 metropolitan areas was tainted by pharmaceuticals. That means at least 41 million Americans may be drinking water containing traces of mood stabilizers, epilepsy drugs, antibiotics, and more. A 2013 study found that Minnesota lakes carry prescription drugs, DEET (an insect repellant), BPA (a plasticizer), and cocaine.

A major source of drugs in drinking water is industrial farms that feed livestock copious amounts of hormones, steroids, and antibiotics. The medicine-laden manure from millions of animals, spread thickly on crop fields, runs off into waterways with the rain.

Agricultural runoff is the largest source of freshwater pollution, according to the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). Untreated animal waste can harbor heavy metals, E. coli, and other pathogens. A 2009 study found that waterborne parasites, viruses, or bacteria from human and animal waste cause nearly 20 million illnesses a year.

http://www.theepochtimes.com/n3/478623-death-of-the-sweet-waters/

Hudson River polluted with high levels of antibiotic-resistant bacteria: study
The germs — resistant to drugs that commonly treat a range of infections — are most prevalent near the sewage pipes at 125th St. in Harlem, according to study published in The Journal of Water and Health.

http://www.nydailynews.com/new-york/uptown/germs-hudson-shiver-article-1.1403635#ixzz2sJqtT9Zd

NO, Professor Curtis, that does not make sense to worry about a few swans when humans and their animals are causing THE major problems.

Feb 22, 2014 12:37pm EST  --  Report as abuse
decdipsticks wrote:
Invasive species includes ALL pets and domestic animals. Yes and there are hundreds of millions of them in the US. Let’s get some CONTEXT here Professor.

Feb 22, 2014 12:44pm EST  --  Report as abuse
decdipsticks wrote:
“But to wildlife experts like Professor Curtis, the mute swans pose the same kind of danger to the natural habitat as other non-native species, including the notorious snakehead fish, a predator native to rivers and lakes in Asia and a dangerous, invasive species in American waters.”

And once again even looking at the snakehead you ignore all the other big problems caused by humans. “The lower Potomac River is a heavily altered ecosystem. Although many native fish species still exist in the river, most of the fish that we see while electrofishing are non-native, including carp, goldfish, catfish and largemouth bass.

Additionally, shoreline and riverine habitats have been HEAVILY ALTERED, and the river is loaded with sediments, nutrients and chemicals from our activities. This makes it hard for a single additional species to have a major impact.”

http://fishwild.vt.edu/snakeheads/Facts.html#03

This is the thing..when humans and their activities and their domestic animals are the major players, it is hard for another single species to have a major impact. I think it’s called ‘scapegoating’.

Feb 22, 2014 1:57pm EST  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.