Supreme Court declines challenges to gun laws

WASHINGTON Mon Feb 24, 2014 10:00am EST

A general view of the U.S. Supreme Court in Washington December 3, 2013. REUTERS/Jonathan Ernst

A general view of the U.S. Supreme Court in Washington December 3, 2013.

Credit: Reuters/Jonathan Ernst

Related Topics

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The Supreme Court on Monday declined to wade into the politically volatile issue of gun control by leaving intact three court rulings rejecting challenges to federal and state laws.

The court's decision not to hear the cases represented a loss for gun rights advocates, including the National Rifle Association, which was behind two of the challenges.

The first case involved a challenge by the NRA to a Texas law that prevents 18-20 year olds from carrying handguns in public. It also raised the broader question of whether there is a broad right under the Second Amendment to bear arms in public.

The second NRA case was a challenge to several federal laws and regulations, dating back to 1968, that make it illegal for firearms dealers to sell guns or ammunition to anyone under 21.

The third case was on the narrow question of whether consumers have the legal right to challenge laws that regulate the sale of firearms. The challenge to a federal law that restricts the interstate transport of guns, and a related Virginia law, were filed by several District of Columbia residents who wished to obtain guns via neighboring Virginia.

The court has yet to decide whether there is a right to carry guns in public, a question left unanswered in its two most recent gun-related decisions.

In the 2008 District of Columbia v. Heller case, the court held that the Second Amendment of the U.S. Constitution guaranteed an individual right to bear arms. Two years later in McDonald v. City of Chicago, the court held that the earlier ruling applied to the states.

(Reporting by Lawrence Hurley; Editing by Howard Goller)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see
Comments (70)
moweddell wrote:
The SCOTUS decision abrigate the courts responsibility to support the Constitutions Second Ammendment to gurantee and protect citizens rights. Reasoning stated in article is because the issue is “volitile” is facicious!!! Lets get some better reporting..

Feb 24, 2014 9:51am EST  --  Report as abuse
ThomJEFFERSON wrote:
After reading the above article… I get a feeling that even the Supreme Court is afraid perhaps politically to uphold support of the 2nd Amendment of the Constitution. You would think they would support the Constitution and put an end to all these groups against it… for the preservation of our country.
Sad that I have seen such a change in our country in all my years…

Feb 24, 2014 10:15am EST  --  Report as abuse
EastBerlin wrote:
Court is afraid to protect the right of Americans, again.

Feb 24, 2014 10:16am EST  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.