Case against man who texted photo of his tattooed genitals dismissed

ATLANTA Mon Feb 24, 2014 3:02pm EST

Related Topics

ATLANTA (Reuters) - A man accused of texting an unsolicited picture of his tattooed genitals to a married mother of young children did not commit a crime under a Georgia state nudity law, the state's Supreme Court ruled on Monday.

Charles Lee Warren faced up to three years in prison after being indicted under a 1970 Georgia law that makes it illegal to send unsolicited nude photographs by mail without a proper warning on the outside of the envelope.

Prosecutors said he texted the picture of his tattooed penis in October 2012 to a woman who then complained to police. According to prosecutors, Warren's genitals were tattooed with the phrase, "STRONG E nuf 4 A MAN BUT Made 4 A WOMAN."

The Georgia Supreme Court said the state law did not cover photos sent electronically through a cell phone text message, and justices dismissed the criminal charge in a unanimous decision.

Legislation proposed last year to amend the law to include pictures transmitted electronically did not pass, according to Georgia General Assembly records.

The state has no other law governing these types of cases, said Lauren Kane, spokeswoman for Georgia Attorney General Sam Olens.

"We respectfully accept the decision of the Georgia Supreme Court," Cherokee County District Attorney Shannon Wallace, whose office prosecuted the texting case, said in a statement.

The defendant's attorney, Donald Roch, also challenged the law on the ground that it violated his client's First Amendment guarantee of free speech, but the court did not address that constitutional issue.

"Obviously, we're pleased with the ruling," Roch said.

(Editing by Colleen Jenkins and Sophie Hares)

FILED UNDER:
We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (7)
Oleoay wrote:
They’re still trying to figure out snow, give them a few decades before they figure out the internets.

Feb 24, 2014 1:26pm EST  --  Report as abuse
Dr.Gutorov wrote:
Do the justices want to get such pictures themselves? Perverts…

Feb 24, 2014 3:15pm EST  --  Report as abuse
FriscoJohn wrote:
New definition of “junk mail”?

Feb 25, 2014 8:41am EST  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.